Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
49 Posts 34 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Lien RagL Lien Rag

    @randahl

    As pointed by Devereaux, Bouie and probably many others, they don't have enough goons to do that, and by far.
    And as shown by Minneapolis, if they try that in some voting places (which is the maximum their numbers can allow), getting their behavior on camera won't bring them good results overall.

    I'm not saying that they won't try it, but they can't pull it out with the current political equilibrium.

    BeeCyclingB This user is from outside of this forum
    BeeCyclingB This user is from outside of this forum
    BeeCycling
    wrote last edited by
    #32

    @lienrag @randahl But they only have to do it in a few key places where the winning margin is usually small one way or the other.

    And they only have to be seen doing it in a few places and spread rumours that it's happening in more to put people off going anywhere near their voting location.

    Lien RagL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BeeCyclingB BeeCycling

      @lienrag @randahl But they only have to do it in a few key places where the winning margin is usually small one way or the other.

      And they only have to be seen doing it in a few places and spread rumours that it's happening in more to put people off going anywhere near their voting location.

      Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
      Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
      Lien Rag
      wrote last edited by
      #33

      @beecycling

      They have to do it at enough key places to offset the counter-effect that we've seen with the Pretti-Good answers to the Minneapolis situation (as far as Texas).
      They don't have enough goons to do that.

      And the chilling effect has to also offset the anger effect.

      Remember, don't comply in advance.

      There are reasons to worry (and to register as an observer in order to prevent them from succeeding), but not to capitulate.

      @randahl

      BeeCyclingB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

        Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

        Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

        Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        Chance
        wrote last edited by
        #34

        @randahl Steve Bannon? The guy from the Epstein files? No way, I can't believe it!!

        Also, it is illegal for federal agents to be at polling locations without an active crime being committed. Let's see how they twist the law this time.

        FenixF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Lien RagL Lien Rag

          @beecycling

          They have to do it at enough key places to offset the counter-effect that we've seen with the Pretti-Good answers to the Minneapolis situation (as far as Texas).
          They don't have enough goons to do that.

          And the chilling effect has to also offset the anger effect.

          Remember, don't comply in advance.

          There are reasons to worry (and to register as an observer in order to prevent them from succeeding), but not to capitulate.

          @randahl

          BeeCyclingB This user is from outside of this forum
          BeeCyclingB This user is from outside of this forum
          BeeCycling
          wrote last edited by
          #35

          @lienrag @randahl I hope that counter effect is still going by November. I'm sure they will do many more terrible things by then. They're probably out to provoke a response that gives them an excuse to cancel the elections entirely. If they can't get that, they will steal them, however blatant they have to be about it. You're not going to get a normal election again until these people are gone, and they're not going to go quietly.

          Lien RagL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • BeeCyclingB BeeCycling

            @lienrag @randahl I hope that counter effect is still going by November. I'm sure they will do many more terrible things by then. They're probably out to provoke a response that gives them an excuse to cancel the elections entirely. If they can't get that, they will steal them, however blatant they have to be about it. You're not going to get a normal election again until these people are gone, and they're not going to go quietly.

            Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
            Lien RagL This user is from outside of this forum
            Lien Rag
            wrote last edited by
            #36

            @beecycling

            Sure.
            That's why careful and reasonable assessment of the threats and opportunities is necessary, rather than FUD.

            @randahl

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Chance

              @randahl Steve Bannon? The guy from the Epstein files? No way, I can't believe it!!

              Also, it is illegal for federal agents to be at polling locations without an active crime being committed. Let's see how they twist the law this time.

              FenixF This user is from outside of this forum
              FenixF This user is from outside of this forum
              Fenix
              wrote last edited by
              #37

              @moonlight1494 With Music?

              @randahl

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

                Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

                Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

                Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

                Frank FrankF This user is from outside of this forum
                Frank FrankF This user is from outside of this forum
                Frank Frank
                wrote last edited by
                #38

                @randahl

                Wasn't this guy already supposed to be in jail, like for committing fraud or something? No? Oh well, the Orange Menace would have waved his imaginary pardon wand for the customary fee.

                I guess it pays to be a member of the Law & Order & Pardon Party 🥳 🎉

                Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Dmitry BorodaenkoD Dmitry Borodaenko

                  @ricardoharvin Bullshit. If they really didn't, they wouldn't be pouring so much money and effort into making it harder to vote.

                  bjb :devuannew: :emacs:B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bjb :devuannew: :emacs:B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bjb :devuannew: :emacs:
                  wrote last edited by
                  #39

                  @ricardoharvin @dmitry

                  An election with only one allowed outcome is not an election.

                  This "election" is performative, to make people think they can still vote so they will accept all these measures. If they get away with it, it will be the last one. This performative election is the last faint chance to object to fascism, that is why they are spending so much - to render any opposition to the current administraton ineffective so that resistance will fail.

                  Ricardo HarvinR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

                    Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

                    Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

                    Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

                    The TurtleT This user is from outside of this forum
                    The TurtleT This user is from outside of this forum
                    The Turtle
                    wrote last edited by
                    #40

                    @randahl so much invested in the idea that trump will never die.

                    He's 80. He will, and soon. And then all the trumpys are fucked, because he won't leave behind a repeatable example anyone will follow, and no successor (Vance ain't it).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bjb :devuannew: :emacs:B bjb :devuannew: :emacs:

                      @ricardoharvin @dmitry

                      An election with only one allowed outcome is not an election.

                      This "election" is performative, to make people think they can still vote so they will accept all these measures. If they get away with it, it will be the last one. This performative election is the last faint chance to object to fascism, that is why they are spending so much - to render any opposition to the current administraton ineffective so that resistance will fail.

                      Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ricardo Harvin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #41

                      @bjb @dmitry Exactly

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Dmitry BorodaenkoD Dmitry Borodaenko

                        @ricardoharvin Bullshit. If they really didn't, they wouldn't be pouring so much money and effort into making it harder to vote.

                        Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ricardo HarvinR This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ricardo Harvin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #42

                        @dmitry *Ultimately*, they do not care because they mean to render all results moot, truth!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • contrasocialC contrasocial

                          @katrinakatrinka @randahl

                          They can't do the whole country, but they don't need to, they just need to do certain districts. This is about holding on to a razor majority in congress.

                          And you have to remember, states like Texas with Greg "the fucker" Abbott are going to be gleeful little helpers in making this happen.

                          I don't want to demoralize people from voting, but we have to be prepared for the real possibility of it being stolen.

                          Katrina Katrinka :donor:K This user is from outside of this forum
                          Katrina Katrinka :donor:K This user is from outside of this forum
                          Katrina Katrinka :donor:
                          wrote last edited by
                          #43

                          @contrasocial @randahl
                          Check out Texas' recent special election. The only way you get a 30 point swing is for Republicans to vote for the Democratic candidate.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Democrat wins special election for red Texas Senate seat

                          With ballots tallied from all but a handful of voting centers, Rehmet had 57% of the vote, besting the 43% for his GOP opponent, Leigh Wambsganss, who had a massive spending advantage.

                          favicon

                          The Texas Tribune (www.texastribune.org)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

                            Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

                            Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

                            Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

                            Ivey Janette McClellandI This user is from outside of this forum
                            Ivey Janette McClellandI This user is from outside of this forum
                            Ivey Janette McClelland
                            wrote last edited by
                            #44

                            @randahl And turn this country back into Jim Crow mode. By banning minorities from voting.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Randahl FinkR Randahl Fink

                              Thank you to Steve Bannon for giving away the game:

                              Step 1: Show the people that ICE can kill anybody.

                              Step 2: Have ICE show up at polling stations in areas where people vote against Trump, so those neighborhoods do not go vote.

                              M.S. Bellows, Jr.M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M.S. Bellows, Jr.M This user is from outside of this forum
                              M.S. Bellows, Jr.
                              wrote last edited by
                              #45

                              @randahl

                              Link Preview Image
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Dmitry BorodaenkoD Dmitry Borodaenko

                                @ricardoharvin Bullshit. If they really didn't, they wouldn't be pouring so much money and effort into making it harder to vote.

                                dragonfrogD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dragonfrogD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dragonfrog
                                wrote last edited by
                                #46

                                @dmitry @ricardoharvin If they only use one tactic to undermine the whole election, then people can point to it and say "see, if they hadn't done *that* then the election would have gone differently".

                                If they try ten different things, where no individual one on its own is sufficient to change the outcome, but any six would be - then any time discussion focuses on one tactic, they can deflect by saying "oh come now, any effect from that was too small to change the outcome anyway, get over it".

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Jürgen HubertJ Jürgen Hubert

                                  @randahl @energisch_

                                  The USA never were a democracy, although they made a pretty convincing cosplayer some of the time.

                                  C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C.Suthorn :prn:
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #47
                                  Jürgen Hubert Bis Trump angefangen hat RichterStellen zu besetzen, waren die USA ein Rechtsstaat. Jedenfalls für Leute mit Geld oder Krautquellding. Randahl Fink Mensch, Marina
                                  Jürgen HubertJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Katrina Katrinka :donor:K Katrina Katrinka :donor:

                                    @randahl
                                    ICE doesn't have that many people.

                                    Also, Minnesota had a special election with ICE oppressing them and scaring people from going out in public. They voted in spite of it.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Minnesotans just showed they’ll ‘crawl over broken glass’ to vote, despite ICE terror

                                    If Trump sends troops to disrupt voting, he could face a massive backlash

                                    favicon

                                    (www.the-downballot.com)

                                    C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C.Suthorn :prn:L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C.Suthorn :prn:
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #48
                                    Katrina Katrinka :donor: You don't have to influence the voters, just the elected representatives. Randahl Fink
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C.Suthorn :prn:L C.Suthorn :prn:
                                      Jürgen Hubert Bis Trump angefangen hat RichterStellen zu besetzen, waren die USA ein Rechtsstaat. Jedenfalls für Leute mit Geld oder Krautquellding. Randahl Fink Mensch, Marina
                                      Jürgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Jürgen HubertJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Jürgen Hubert
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #49

                                      @randahl @energisch_ @Life_is

                                      Aber die Fähigkeit zu wählen war nie ein Recht in den USA - nur ein Privileg.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post