I was thinking about creating a website with a simple list
-
@stux Is that not the same as this? https://epsteinweb.org
@LeonardoDiOttio Oh, did not know about that!
Maybe a wiki it is
-
@Shadedlady Is Yunohost op een van mn servers. geen inlog nog
@stux op de voorpagina zou ik een link plaatsen naar waar de files te downloaden zijn.
-
I was thinking about creating a website with a simple list
The #Epstein list.
But would it be worth it..
Check this.
XWiki and WikiJS seems to be often used ones.
-
An idea for example is creating a list with names and how often they appear in the files
I'm not saying they are guilty but if people are mentioned over and over..
I don't believe no one knew anything, and if they are not guilty they should have nothing to hide
If not... well, screw them
@stux add "god" as name to the list
-
@stux add "god" as name to the list
-
I was thinking about creating a website with a simple list
The #Epstein list.
But would it be worth it..
@stux On this morning’s FT News Briefing podcast they had a data journalist who is part of the FT team analysiing the Epstein Files and he described how complex it is.
Not just because sheer amount of documents but also the fact that the source documents keep changing. Apparently the DOJ keeps discovering that they forgot to redact the name of a victim in a file, which then needs to be updated.
Understandably the FT doesn’t want to publish names of victims.
-
@stux On this morning’s FT News Briefing podcast they had a data journalist who is part of the FT team analysiing the Epstein Files and he described how complex it is.
Not just because sheer amount of documents but also the fact that the source documents keep changing. Apparently the DOJ keeps discovering that they forgot to redact the name of a victim in a file, which then needs to be updated.
Understandably the FT doesn’t want to publish names of victims.
@LeonardoDiOttio I bet indeed..
but also the terrible redactions that dont make any sense
It's such a terrible mess
-
@stux Context matters. A lot.
If just being in the files made you guilty, Bilbo Baggins would be running his own pedo-ring at Bag-end.
@stux @McHollander An actual example of this is Tom Brady. He's only mentioned because Steve Bannon was upset that Epstein wanted to have dinner instead of watch a Patriots game (Tom Brady being their QB at the time) with him
-
@stux Given that the people implicated are the rich and powerful, that's not just a lot of work: it's highly risky work. It is in fact a lawsuit waiting to happen.
@stux @McHollander Lawsuits if you're lucky. Some journalists have been killed over leaks that involve certain people
-
@stux Think of it as raising the moral responsibility of the game.
@McHollander AI did it
-
@stux @McHollander An actual example of this is Tom Brady. He's only mentioned because Steve Bannon was upset that Epstein wanted to have dinner instead of watch a Patriots game (Tom Brady being their QB at the time) with him
@trebach @McHollander Yes and those should be not listed since it doesnt make sense
But there are soo many that do talk in a certain way, hinting they know a LOT more even using certain words
I'm not sure how they can excuse that with this context
-
An idea for example is creating a list with names and how often they appear in the files
I'm not saying they are guilty but if people are mentioned over and over..
I don't believe no one knew anything, and if they are not guilty they should have nothing to hide
If not... well, screw them
@stux Just be careful, i did see a toot earlier suggesting there are some opensource licenses present in the files, so make sure you filter out stuff like that, as it would be unfair to accidentally accuse someone of being involved in that when it turns out their opensource project was downloaded/used without them likely even being aware.
-
I was thinking about creating a website with a simple list
The #Epstein list.
But would it be worth it..
