Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. Valve Responds To Steam Machine's HDMI 2.1 Display Support Controversy [HW support is there, but "The HDMI forum" doesn’t allow with OpenSource drivers]

Valve Responds To Steam Machine's HDMI 2.1 Display Support Controversy [HW support is there, but "The HDMI forum" doesn’t allow with OpenSource drivers]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
125 Posts 64 Posters 19 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca

    That’s still a licensing issue: you’re not allowed to license from the HDMI consortium and then freely sublicense to all your users, which is what open source requires. Hopefully this eventually concludes in the end of relevance for HDMI and we can have a freer, and just better ecosystem in general.

    _ This user is from outside of this forum
    _ This user is from outside of this forum
    _stranger_@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #111

    Valve should ship it as displayport internally and bundle a free HDMI adapter that they sell in the store, that way it’s all open source and the HDMI issue is taken care of in the most flippant way possible.

    X 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.deO opticalmoose@discuss.tchncs.de

      “We need to develop a one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.”

      _ This user is from outside of this forum
      _ This user is from outside of this forum
      _stranger_@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #112

      They did, it was displayport. HDMI actively removes features the TV makers don’t want you to have.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S sem

        Huh I though that was hd-dvd

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        chaogomu@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #113

        Could have been…

        Both were about the same timeframe.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • _ _stranger_@lemmy.world

          Valve should ship it as displayport internally and bundle a free HDMI adapter that they sell in the store, that way it’s all open source and the HDMI issue is taken care of in the most flippant way possible.

          X This user is from outside of this forum
          X This user is from outside of this forum
          xyguy@startrek.website
          wrote on last edited by
          #114

          I think thats actually what Intel did on their A series graphics cards. Only had display port out signals but had a display port to HDMI adapter built into the board.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • alessandro@lemmy.caA alessandro@lemmy.ca
            This post did not contain any content.
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            LiveLM
            wrote on last edited by
            #115

            1 Reply Last reply
            20
            • X xyguy@startrek.website

              I think thats actually what Intel did on their A series graphics cards. Only had display port out signals but had a display port to HDMI adapter built into the board.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #116

              Yes, but that adds more cost. I don’t have any hard data on this, but it feels like their current solution works fine, since anyone using more data than 2160p60, who also won’t accept chroma subsampling, probably is already using DP. Maybe this is a direction to pressure the HDMI forum, since unlike AMD, valve’s drivers are actually open source on the majority of their users’ machines. And if things change in the future, external adapters or proprietary adapters are both solutions.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S sem

                Cec over USBC?

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #117

                I’ve never actually used CEC, but everything I’ve seen says it’s just like a USB HID, correct? According to wikipedia, there already exist USB to CEC adapters.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R ramble81@lemmy.zip

                  I don’t see “relevance for HDMI” ending anytime soon. Tell me how easy it is to find a TV with DP inputs. Nearly 99% of consumer gear uses HDMI.

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #118

                  It’s easy to find a TV with USB-C input, though not universal. That still uses the DP protocol, and cables with different connectors on opposite ends are both cheaper and more common than those with HDMI as a result. Also, this is only even an issue if HDMI 2.0 isn’t fast enough for you, so old devices aren’t a concern.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S stoy@lemmy.zip

                    HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.

                    What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    sir_simon_spamalot@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #119

                    It makes them money.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • S spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca

                      I’ve never actually used CEC, but everything I’ve seen says it’s just like a USB HID, correct? According to wikipedia, there already exist USB to CEC adapters.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      sem
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #120

                      I don’t know what HID is, but CEC lets you control Kodi with the TV remote.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S sem

                        I don’t know what HID is, but CEC lets you control Kodi with the TV remote.

                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #121

                        HID means a human interface device, so most commonly a keyboard, but remote controls can and do use the same protocol just fine.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pory@lemmy.worldP pory@lemmy.world

                          How many embedded DRM-controlled news article videos are you watching on your living room tv though? PC monitors usually have native display port nowadays, no converters or HDMI necessary.

                          woelkchen@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
                          woelkchen@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
                          woelkchen@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #122

                          How many embedded DRM-controlled news article videos are you watching on your living room tv though?

                          Obviously it’s only a fraction of the overall DRMed content out there but it exists, most notably for live sports that TV stations stream for free on their website but require paid subscriptions when using streaming apps.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S spinning_disk_engineer@lemmy.ca

                            It’s easy to find a TV with USB-C input, though not universal. That still uses the DP protocol, and cables with different connectors on opposite ends are both cheaper and more common than those with HDMI as a result. Also, this is only even an issue if HDMI 2.0 isn’t fast enough for you, so old devices aren’t a concern.

                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            R This user is from outside of this forum
                            ramble81@lemmy.zip
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #123

                            The only down side is DP Alt mode is optional and must be enabled and supported by the internal controller and system. In order to do that, you might as well just go full DP at that point and somehow I don’t think the manufacturers are gonna spend more money on that. Most likely the USB-C port only supports a mass storage class device.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • thingsiplay@beehaw.orgT thingsiplay@beehaw.org

                              Hmm, that’s a new one for me. Why the dislike for DisplayPort?

                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              S This user is from outside of this forum
                              snowpenguin@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #124

                              I had many problems with it in the past. It has been behaving well with me in the last 1-2 years though

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • S stoy@lemmy.zip

                                HDMI requires a license cost, DisplayPort is free.

                                What advantage does HDMI hold over DisplayPort?

                                alessandro@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alessandro@lemmy.caA This user is from outside of this forum
                                alessandro@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #125

                                Conglomerate like Sony pushes it with their business in selling TV and collateral interest in media DRM for their services.

                                Other TV OEM companies follow Sony&co. lead because… uhm… “Oh! They make customers… spend money” broadly shake hands in air

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0

                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post