Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The Earth is reflecting less and less sunlight, study reveals

The Earth is reflecting less and less sunlight, study reveals

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
38 Posts 21 Posters 2.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • PrivateNoobP PrivateNoob

    Emo Earth letsgoooo!

    TacoButtPlugT This user is from outside of this forum
    TacoButtPlugT This user is from outside of this forum
    TacoButtPlug
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I hate you (but I also love you)

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    6
    • J JohnnyEnzyme

      FWIW, the Earth has about 500-600My left before common photosynthesis is no longer possible, due to consequences of Sol (our sun) relentlessly heating up, gradually.

      Now personally, my understanding is that unless complex life somehow adapts, then that will be the end of such upon Earth, with simpler life presumably surviving for billions more years past that mark.

      Point is-- if complex life can survive the coming collapse, then it evidently does have a very nice, healthy window to work with. Personally, I suppose that might be helped out quite a bit by the ‘churning of the continents,’ in which landmass gets regularly cycled back in to the magma layer over the course of millions of years, with new areas appearing on the other edges, so to speak.

      EDIT: clarifications

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      I’m enjoying the thought of our current planet being melted down into liquid hot magma and a whole new planet surface getting a chance

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      14
      • B beefandsquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        I sure hope they figure this out for all of the people dumb enough to still be having children.

        S This user is from outside of this forum
        S This user is from outside of this forum
        salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        They already did, and current policy is to ignore it

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        18
        • Y yawweee877h444@lemmy.world

          But billionaires need bigger yachts. And more mansions. What’re we to do? Can’t sacrifice the billionaires ultra-mega-yachts.

          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          fartographer@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Dark colored yachts

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          2
          • J JohnnyEnzyme

            FWIW, the Earth has about 500-600My left before common photosynthesis is no longer possible, due to consequences of Sol (our sun) relentlessly heating up, gradually.

            Now personally, my understanding is that unless complex life somehow adapts, then that will be the end of such upon Earth, with simpler life presumably surviving for billions more years past that mark.

            Point is-- if complex life can survive the coming collapse, then it evidently does have a very nice, healthy window to work with. Personally, I suppose that might be helped out quite a bit by the ‘churning of the continents,’ in which landmass gets regularly cycled back in to the magma layer over the course of millions of years, with new areas appearing on the other edges, so to speak.

            EDIT: clarifications

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            What about life around deep sea vents?

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            6
            • S salacious_coaster@infosec.pub

              I’m enjoying the thought of our current planet being melted down into liquid hot magma and a whole new planet surface getting a chance

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              JohnnyEnzyme
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Right??

              It’s going to be glorious.
              –(sotto voce)

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              8
              • T themeatbridge

                Just in case it wasn’t clear, that’s a horrifying discovery. Like the extinction of all life on earth.

                P This user is from outside of this forum
                P This user is from outside of this forum
                protist@mander.xyz
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                That’s actually not clear at all. How did you draw this conclusion from what’s written here? It cites decreased pollution across the northern hemisphere as one of the drivers of this, for example, and how is that horrifying?

                T J L 3 Replies Last reply
                1
                9
                • S salacious_coaster@infosec.pub

                  They already did, and current policy is to ignore it

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  beefandsquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  Well, they are certainly profiting from the despair.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  9
                  • K korhaka@sopuli.xyz

                    What about life around deep sea vents?

                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                    JohnnyEnzyme
                    wrote on last edited by johnnyenzyme@piefed.social
                    #16

                    Ahh, good point, yes.
                    I actually was thinking about those beautiful little deep-sea worlds when I wrote the above, but simply didn’t know enough to assert a dang-ol’ thing at the time. Okay, let’s see:

                    However, although it is often said that these communities exist independently of the sun, some of the organisms are actually dependent upon oxygen produced by photosynthetic organisms, while others are anaerobic. –WP

                    So… looks like we have at least *some* members of these little communities carrying on, past the death of oxygenic photosynthesis, which they evidently don’t need in order to survive. (meanwhile with anoxygenic photosynthesis carrying on for many millions more of years).

                    But off the top of my empty coconut, it does raise a couple Q’s:

                    1. Since there are maybe a dozen or less community members who live in these little worlds, closely built in to a commensurate ecosystem, would the death of the ones who rely on traditional photosynthesis bring about a collapse, either partial or total?

                    2. Would rampant global warming tend to mess with the already super-heated, typically sulfurous nature of these worlds? (me, I would tend to think “nawt,” since they’re already so hot, but then again, I’m just some layperson really curious about all this, hah)

                    Ah… those beautiful, entrancing little forbidden worlds:
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECBbAjoEHWI

                    ❤️

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    5
                    • C cm0002@sh.itjust.works
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      Security Verification

                      favicon

                      (phys.org)

                      JeenaJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      JeenaJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Jeena
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      This is how it started on Venus too!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      7
                      • C cm0002@sh.itjust.works
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        Security Verification

                        favicon

                        (phys.org)

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        archonet@lemy.lol
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        at this point I’m fully expecting the only thing that keeps us from extincting ourselves with global warming is almost extincting ourselves with nuclear winter.

                        C S 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        21
                        • A archonet@lemy.lol

                          at this point I’m fully expecting the only thing that keeps us from extincting ourselves with global warming is almost extincting ourselves with nuclear winter.

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          cm0002@sh.itjust.works
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          See we got this! We’re just going to get rid of mice climate change with a snake nuclear winter!

                          They’ll just cancel each other out perfectly 😌

                          A B 2 Replies Last reply
                          1
                          8
                          • C cm0002@sh.itjust.works

                            See we got this! We’re just going to get rid of mice climate change with a snake nuclear winter!

                            They’ll just cancel each other out perfectly 😌

                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            archonet@lemy.lol
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            I don’t wish for this to happen, mind you, but we are clearly living in the dumbest possible timeline, and so it is the only solution that makes sense

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            7
                            • C cm0002@sh.itjust.works

                              See we got this! We’re just going to get rid of mice climate change with a snake nuclear winter!

                              They’ll just cancel each other out perfectly 😌

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              With how bad its going a summer without winter might give us another 10 years.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              2
                              • P protist@mander.xyz

                                That’s actually not clear at all. How did you draw this conclusion from what’s written here? It cites decreased pollution across the northern hemisphere as one of the drivers of this, for example, and how is that horrifying?

                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                themeatbridge
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Because absorbed light is excess energy.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                3
                                • P protist@mander.xyz

                                  That’s actually not clear at all. How did you draw this conclusion from what’s written here? It cites decreased pollution across the northern hemisphere as one of the drivers of this, for example, and how is that horrifying?

                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jtotheb@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Also due to reduced water vapor and ice cover lol. It’s a conclusion that can be drawn without much reliance on the article, which focuses a lot on specific climate model improvements and not the obvious concern: given our desire for the earth to reflect more of the sun’s rays and cool off, reflecting fewer and warming up is not good

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  6
                                  • T themeatbridge

                                    Because absorbed light is excess energy.

                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    P This user is from outside of this forum
                                    protist@mander.xyz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    It’s pretty big leap from the Earth absorbing slightly more energy from the sun to “the extinction of all life on Earth.”

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • J jtotheb@lemmy.world

                                      Also due to reduced water vapor and ice cover lol. It’s a conclusion that can be drawn without much reliance on the article, which focuses a lot on specific climate model improvements and not the obvious concern: given our desire for the earth to reflect more of the sun’s rays and cool off, reflecting fewer and warming up is not good

                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                                      protist@mander.xyz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      “The extinction of all life in Earth” is not a reasonable conclusion to draw from this

                                      C J 2 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • C cm0002@sh.itjust.works
                                        This post did not contain any content.
                                        Security Verification

                                        favicon

                                        (phys.org)

                                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                        zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        This must be what people have meant when they say we’re headed for the Dark Ages.

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        7
                                        • Z zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                          This must be what people have meant when they say we’re headed for the Dark Ages.

                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          altphoto@lemmy.today
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          I assume its the opposite. It’s absorbing light as heat vs reflecting and cooling down.

                                          Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          6

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post