Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    Link Preview Image
    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

    favicon

    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

    R.L. LEH This user is from outside of this forum
    R.L. LEH This user is from outside of this forum
    R.L. LE
    wrote last edited by
    #26

    @sundogplanets The CO2 footprint for the launches alone must be terrible? 🤔

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      Link Preview Image
      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

      favicon

      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

      Angus McIntyreA This user is from outside of this forum
      Angus McIntyreA This user is from outside of this forum
      Angus McIntyre
      wrote last edited by
      #27

      @sundogplanets

      The world's most heartbreaking six-word stories:

      1906: For sale. Baby shoes. Never worn.

      2026: Orbital data centers for artificial intelligence.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

        Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

        EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
        EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
        Eye
        wrote last edited by
        #28

        @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social

        Added to my To Read list.

        Enjoy the sunrise and birdies. Hope you got a bit of sleep 🤞

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • kwayk42K kwayk42

          @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

          CyC This user is from outside of this forum
          CyC This user is from outside of this forum
          Cy
          wrote last edited by
          #29
          It better be portable!

          CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

            Slop Kitty Appreciates YouJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Slop Kitty Appreciates YouJ This user is from outside of this forum
            Slop Kitty Appreciates You
            wrote last edited by
            #30

            @sundogplanets

            Bezos: Oh yeah? Well AWS will put TWO million data centers in orbit!

            China: Let 5 million space data centers bloom!

            Musk: Well, then SpaceX will put TEN million centers in orbit!

            Bezos: Fine! ELEVENTY million AWS centers!

            Musk: Hah! TWELVETY million SpaceX centers! Each with a cool robot!

            Bezos: Meh-meh-meh-robot-meh. Amazon has robots.

            Musk: But not COOL robots.

            TA4/M0KHRM Patrick GeorgiP 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • CyC Cy
              It better be portable!

              CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
              kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
              kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
              kwayk42
              wrote last edited by
              #31

              @cy @sundogplanets 🤔🤔🤔 so you're saying I should build it on a boat?

              CyC 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kwayk42K kwayk42

                @cy @sundogplanets 🤔🤔🤔 so you're saying I should build it on a boat?

                CyC This user is from outside of this forum
                CyC This user is from outside of this forum
                Cy
                wrote last edited by
                #32
                Not enough cover. Build it on a pickup truck!

                CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Kiloku - Secretário do CaosK Kiloku - Secretário do Caos

                  @sundogplanets not that it matters, but it also wouldn't budge a thing in the kardashev scale, as it's supposed to measure how much power civilization can harness, and they certainly would pale in comparison to the total amount of earth based computing power, not to mention all the power used in non-computing usage

                  Michael BuschM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Michael BuschM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Michael Busch
                  wrote last edited by
                  #33

                  @Kiloku @sundogplanets

                  SpaceX's hype has never been constrained by facts.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CyC Cy
                    Not enough cover. Build it on a pickup truck!

                    CC: @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                    kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                    kwayk42
                    wrote last edited by
                    #34

                    @cy @sundogplanets I mean if I'm in international waters with a gun powerful enough to shoot down satellites, I'm pretty sure I'll be good

                    CyC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                      neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neville parkN This user is from outside of this forum
                      neville park
                      wrote last edited by
                      #35

                      @sundogplanets it's incredibly embarrassing and pathetic that a lot of the techie sorts with access to power now are people who…like I say, there's no such thing as reading too much science fiction, but there IS such a thing as reading too LITTLE stuff that ISN'T science fiction.

                      mkjM G 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                        Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                        Mariya DelanoM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Mariya DelanoM This user is from outside of this forum
                        Mariya Delano
                        wrote last edited by
                        #36

                        @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social this rec made me happy to see because it’s published by Hachette (where I work) and I just got a copy from the office to gift to a family member who’s been a bit too AI-optimistic.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                          I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                          Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                          Mark Reeves 📚 🎸H This user is from outside of this forum
                          Mark Reeves 📚 🎸H This user is from outside of this forum
                          Mark Reeves 📚 🎸
                          wrote last edited by
                          #37

                          @sundogplanets @adambecker.bsky.social 💯

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                            Link Preview Image
                            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                            favicon

                            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                            Alephwyr: Most Normal DragonA This user is from outside of this forum
                            Alephwyr: Most Normal DragonA This user is from outside of this forum
                            Alephwyr: Most Normal Dragon
                            wrote last edited by
                            #38

                            @sundogplanets Hell is not below the earth

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              Link Preview Image
                              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                              favicon

                              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                              Quinn9282 🖥️🌙✌️Q This user is from outside of this forum
                              Quinn9282 🖥️🌙✌️Q This user is from outside of this forum
                              Quinn9282 🖥️🌙✌️
                              wrote last edited by
                              #39

                              @sundogplanets Other than the obvious, how on earth are you supposed to be able to maneuver such a large number of satellites in extremely close proximity in orbit to prevent them from colliding with each other or anything else at all? With that number of satellites, even if just one collision were to occur at some point, it would be beyond disastrous (at worse, we'd have like many thousands of satellites/junk concurrently raining down into Earth kinda thing).

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kwayk42K kwayk42

                                @cy @sundogplanets I mean if I'm in international waters with a gun powerful enough to shoot down satellites, I'm pretty sure I'll be good

                                CyC This user is from outside of this forum
                                CyC This user is from outside of this forum
                                Cy
                                wrote last edited by
                                #40
                                Entire US navy vs 1 boat boi with a wave motion gun
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • schrotthaufenS schrotthaufen

                                  @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                  RiaResistsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  RiaResistsR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  RiaResists
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #41

                                  @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets
                                  Elon paid for it so…
                                  #ImpeachTheGQP

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                    favicon

                                    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                    Bruno NicolettiB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Bruno NicolettiB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Bruno Nicoletti
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #42

                                    @sundogplanets Orbiting data centres are stupid for a huge range of reasons, not the least powering them, cooling them and fixing them. Just another idiotic idea from Musk (Optimius, Cybertruck, The Boring Company, “Full” self driving, etc….).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • neville parkN neville park

                                      @sundogplanets it's incredibly embarrassing and pathetic that a lot of the techie sorts with access to power now are people who…like I say, there's no such thing as reading too much science fiction, but there IS such a thing as reading too LITTLE stuff that ISN'T science fiction.

                                      mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mkj
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #43

                                      @nev Or when you're reading science fiction which was intended to be a warning, and treating it as something that should be done because it's Cool™!

                                      "I have read Do Not Build The Torment Nexus and decided to dedicate the rest of my life to ensuring that we *never* have a Torment Nexus" said no billionaire ever.

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      neville parkN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                        favicon

                                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                        MycotropicM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MycotropicM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Mycotropic
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #44

                                        @sundogplanets

                                        “Orbital data centers are the most efficient way to meet the accelerating demand for AI computing power,”

                                        Demand isn't accelerating, you're forcing it on everyone you assholes!! We can't NOT use it when you make it an integral part of every product you sell ASSHOLES!

                                        OblomovO 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                          favicon

                                          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Tom Hayward
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #45

                                          @sundogplanets my condolences. The moment I saw this story, my thoughts were with you.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post