Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Liberals’ lead shrinks as Canadian mood plummets to historic lows

Liberals’ lead shrinks as Canadian mood plummets to historic lows

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
67 Posts 28 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TomatoPotato69

    Sure, you can put centre wherever you are comfortable. You’re missing the point I’m trying to make though (deliberately, I assume), and that is that the NDP used to be a bit more to the left, and now they have moved a bit more towards the centre-line moving in the rightward direction on that spectrum. Some might say “shifting a bit to the right”. Maybe not a lot, but enough to water down their platform and push them at least firmly into just centrist territory and not centre-left, but I still consider them just to the right of centre.

    I think so much of Western societies have shifted quite a bit to the right along with increased globalisation and free trade, and a bunch of US influence and missions trying to eradicate socialist governments, that it has blurred where ‘centre’ is on the spectrum, and ‘centre’ to many people has moved rightward along with the general sentiment of society today. Which is why I think a centre-left party a little bit further left of the NDP would be nice. That or if the NDP shuffled left a couple times and decided to be bold and go all-in on a proper all-encompassing left of centre policy.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    auli@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #57

    Sure they shifted right but they are not right of centre.

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • T TomatoPotato69

      Sure, you can put centre wherever you are comfortable. You’re missing the point I’m trying to make though (deliberately, I assume), and that is that the NDP used to be a bit more to the left, and now they have moved a bit more towards the centre-line moving in the rightward direction on that spectrum. Some might say “shifting a bit to the right”. Maybe not a lot, but enough to water down their platform and push them at least firmly into just centrist territory and not centre-left, but I still consider them just to the right of centre.

      I think so much of Western societies have shifted quite a bit to the right along with increased globalisation and free trade, and a bunch of US influence and missions trying to eradicate socialist governments, that it has blurred where ‘centre’ is on the spectrum, and ‘centre’ to many people has moved rightward along with the general sentiment of society today. Which is why I think a centre-left party a little bit further left of the NDP would be nice. That or if the NDP shuffled left a couple times and decided to be bold and go all-in on a proper all-encompassing left of centre policy.

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #58

      I actually agree with a lot of what you’re saying, except perhaps what is considered center. I absolutely agree we could use a more left-leaning party, whether that is the NDP or a new party, but more importantly, we need a system that allows more than two parties to consistently have a meaningful impact in government.

      I don’t necessarily think this new party, or the new NDP, should be as left-leaning as you do, but that also wouldn’t matter as much if we didn’t have the lack of representation that parties with less but still notable support receive in our current system.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A auli@lemmy.ca

        Sure they shifted right but they are not right of centre.

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        TomatoPotato69
        wrote on last edited by
        #59

        Agree to disagree. Maybe not right of the centre in the US, and maybe not right of centre in Germany these days, or right of centre in the UK. But right of where centre should be, and used to be in many different countries. Our whole political system needs a kick to the left and push centre back from it’s constant rightward creep. I mean, the US is collapsing into fascism and our own Conservative party have been mimicking a lot of their actions. Liberals keep moving to the right and now overlap what used to be Progressive Conservative territory, and the NDP keep trying to water down their policies to draw Liberal voters without going too far. Centre has shifted, so maybe the NDP is left of what centre has become in our current political landscape, but is right of where centre used to be. And there’s a whole heck of a lot of room between the NDP now and full-blown Leninist bullshit. I think more people should reflect of what ‘centre’ has become, and that a little bit of socialism is NOT communism. The US just keeps spewing everywhere, all over our media, that socialists are commies, and commies are bad.

        In Chile, for example, they wouldn’t view the NDP as being as being particularly left of centre if at all. Their current government with Boric is quite a bit left of the NDP, and their pre-US-fucking-everything-up government was even more left. Relatively, the NDP is a pretty firmly centre party that has been selling out to more and more ‘free market solutions’ and bandaid fixes rather than being a socialist party. None of the Chileans I know in Canada consider the NDP to be a left of centre party, and my friends feel totally unrepresented by any of the parties because none of them are really left-of-centre.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca

          I actually agree with a lot of what you’re saying, except perhaps what is considered center. I absolutely agree we could use a more left-leaning party, whether that is the NDP or a new party, but more importantly, we need a system that allows more than two parties to consistently have a meaningful impact in government.

          I don’t necessarily think this new party, or the new NDP, should be as left-leaning as you do, but that also wouldn’t matter as much if we didn’t have the lack of representation that parties with less but still notable support receive in our current system.

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          TomatoPotato69
          wrote on last edited by
          #60

          I think I may be a bit more extreme in my examples to try and highlight the point. And I agree to disagree on the centre. My wife is Chilean, and their current government is quite a bit left of the NDP and she would totally consider the NDP to be even more right of centre than I do. But that doesn’t really matter. I think somewhere in that left of centre bubble there is a good place to be found.

          And I agree with you that we need more parties. And a new electoral system, maybe a mixed-member proportional system or something that retains some geographic representation. Ideally I think minority governance is where it’s at. We can’t and shouldn’t all have the same ideas, and nobody should be able to just force through legislation with a majority. The whole point of that with some brainstorming we can make something better together that generally works for everyone, although some people can never be pleased.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A auli@lemmy.ca

            Never going to happen. And I don’t know if I would want it to. I mean it well just be as corrupt as could be, we would need to fix our electoral system before this.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            TomatoPotato69
            wrote on last edited by
            #61

            Fixing the electoral system and having another left-of-centre party don’t have to be mutually exclusive. I’d like to see both. And maybe a few more parties that represent other peoples perspectives so that we can do away with majority governments and let parties work together and make compromises to govern instead of the constant political ping-pong of majority governments undoing everything of the previous government and the constant negativity and attacks and tantrums. And I’m talking about a moderate, democratic, socialist party. Not some authoritarian communist party.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Y yes_this_time@lemmy.world

              NDP is not a right wing party

              R This user is from outside of this forum
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              revan343@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #62

              They sure seem to be trying to be; hopefully new leadership brings them back to their roots as a labour party

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • A auli@lemmy.ca

                But what is the other option the stuff the NDP is pushing and Trudeau was. I mean how many times did they try to push gender rights or something in a trade deal? I mean we can’t force our values on other countries and what are we supposed to do when they don’t follow them?

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                bcboy911@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #63

                I don’t support forcing our values onto other countries, at least to a certain extent. The NDP definitely lost its way under Singh and became blinkered by identity politics. But I have hope that they can be rejuvenated with a strong economic populist and leftist message for the next election.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • B bcboy911@lemmy.ca

                  Pollievre will do tax cuts, deregulation and austerity while keeping us distracted with 24/7 idiotic conservative culture wars. Carney is doing tax cuts, deregulation and austerity while keeping us distracted with the promise of “nation building projects” that will never materialize. Either way it’s tax cuts, deregulation and austerity. The only difference is the type lies they’re telling to distract us. 🙂

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #64

                  Poilievre would increase GST so poor pay taxes. That was the whole point of Mulroney’s GST.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Y yes_this_time@lemmy.world

                    NDP is not a right wing party

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #65

                    They aren’t an independent party at all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M mrdown@lemmy.world

                      You think we are fools aren’t you. Zionism is very clear you can just check the writing of Herzl and Zionist leaders to know what it is . Caney can’t just invent another definition.

                      He said that Palestinians should accept Israel but we should all know that it is Israel that is the settler colonial power who occupied Palestinians land and ethnically cleansing them multiple time. Israel couldn’t have been created without mass displacements because jews only owned 5% to 8% of land and was geographically dispersed.

                      He talk about how Palestinians should behave to get their states while Canada was quickly recognizing Israel after the Nekba and the multiple Zionist terrorist operations

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      terath@sh.itjust.works
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #66

                      If you support a one state solution I think you’re highly immoral. Sounds like you do want a one state solution.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T terath@sh.itjust.works

                        If you support a one state solution I think you’re highly immoral. Sounds like you do want a one state solution.

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mrdown@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #67

                        If you don’t want a one state solution you are immoral because a two state solution would be mass deportation from both sides

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post