Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. All of 'em defeated with one line

All of 'em defeated with one line

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
63 Posts 43 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Y yermaw@sh.itjust.works

    Pure theory, likely never ever going to be real, but could a bullet move so fast that it goes through someone without even damaging them?

    E This user is from outside of this forum
    E This user is from outside of this forum
    emi@ani.social
    wrote last edited by
    #24

    Not really applicable but think there could be a small chance it would quantum tunnel through the person but that’s such miniscule chance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B breakerswitch@lemmy.world

      So, yes and no. Acceleration due to gravity impacts all objects equally. With no air resistance, on earth, everything speeds up at 9.8m/s/s. But, that “no air resistance” is a big asterisk. This is why, say, parachutes work. It’s also how we get terminal velocity. Often misinterpreted as “how fast you’d have to go to die from a fall” it’s actually “how fast you need to go before the drag from your air resistance is a force greater than or equal to gravity”

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      athatet@lemmy.zip
      wrote last edited by
      #25

      Right. That all makes sense. So the air resistance is what is also causing it to heat up. I still don’t see why a person wouldn’t do that.

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • A athatet@lemmy.zip

        Right. That all makes sense. So the air resistance is what is also causing it to heat up. I still don’t see why a person wouldn’t do that.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        breakerswitch@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #26

        So, multiple options here. Skydivers regularly hit terminal velocity, as fast as they’ll go in atmosphere, before pulling their chutes. At these speeds, heat from friction isn’t enough to worry about. Once again though, if you’re coming down from space, that “in atmosphere” asterisk goes away. If you’re dropping from a satellite, you’re going at speeds necessary to orbit, and you don’t have anything slowing you down until you hit the atmosphere. Suddenly your terminal velocity is way lower than infinity, and the friction you’re feeling from the atmosphere is INTENSE, rapidly turning that speed into heat

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        9
        • B breakerswitch@lemmy.world

          So, multiple options here. Skydivers regularly hit terminal velocity, as fast as they’ll go in atmosphere, before pulling their chutes. At these speeds, heat from friction isn’t enough to worry about. Once again though, if you’re coming down from space, that “in atmosphere” asterisk goes away. If you’re dropping from a satellite, you’re going at speeds necessary to orbit, and you don’t have anything slowing you down until you hit the atmosphere. Suddenly your terminal velocity is way lower than infinity, and the friction you’re feeling from the atmosphere is INTENSE, rapidly turning that speed into heat

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          athatet@lemmy.zip
          wrote last edited by
          #27

          Alight cool. All basically what I figured. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D daddledew@lemmy.world

            That is simply not true. All you have to do is design your projectile in shape, construction and materials so the kinetic energy gets properly used to have the desired effect on the target.

            A tiny 40 grain .204 Ruger bullet with the insane muzzle velocity of 4100 fps will absolutely explode a watermelon if you use a rapidly expanding projectile such as a ballistic tipped varmint round. If you use the same against a reactive steel target that was only rated for rimfire, it will melt a clean hole through it without even noticeably moving it. And if you use it against a bull moose, it will absolutely destroy a large amount of surface tissue but not achieve enough penetration to reach the internal organs for a clean kill.

            It isn’t a simple problem, the are many different types of dynamics that you can encounter depending on the nature of the projectile, velocity and target.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            AwesomeLowlander
            wrote last edited by
            #28

            I get the feeling the 4 million grain Revolving Peasant Gun with the velocity of 1% the speed of light will have the desired effect on any target.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • C chuckleslord@lemmy.world

              … the death star orbits. The timer for the rebels to blow it up in a New Hope was how long its orbit would take to clear the moon in its path to the rebel base. The battle of endor was fought over the new death star in orbit over the moon.

              Yes, the death star is capable of warp, but that just puts it into orbit over different things.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              dev_null@lemmy.ml
              wrote last edited by dev_null@lemmy.ml
              #29

              Yes it orbits in the movies, that doesn’t conflict with anything I said. I’m describing a scenario where it doesn’t (which doesn’t happen in the movies).

              A space station with the ability to achieve orbital speeds on it’s own power means it can also negate orbital speeds, before you jump off. And presumably regain them afterwards, if it doesn’t want to also plummet down to the planet.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • T traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                If a character has 121hp or more they’re able to jump from a space station onto earth with like a super hero landing??

                gutek8134@lemmy.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
                gutek8134@lemmy.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
                gutek8134@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #30

                Alternatively, invest 18 levels into monk and get no damage in 99,51% of cases

                Link Preview Image
                AnyDice

                AnyDice is an advanced dice probability calculator, available online. It is created with roleplaying games in mind.

                favicon

                (anydice.com)

                1 Reply Last reply
                7
                • T traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                  If a character has 121hp or more they’re able to jump from a space station onto earth with like a super hero landing??

                  skulblakaS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skulblakaS This user is from outside of this forum
                  skulblaka
                  wrote last edited by
                  #31

                  Yes.

                  ODST-Dropping your barbarian is objectively the best way to have him enter combat, and it inflicts psychological damage to anyone close enough to witness it.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  10
                  • A AwesomeLowlander

                    I get the feeling the 4 million grain Revolving Peasant Gun with the velocity of 1% the speed of light will have the desired effect on any target.

                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #32

                    What makes you say that?

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                      What makes you say that?

                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                      AwesomeLowlander
                      wrote last edited by
                      #33

                      Well I’m being tongue in cheek, but I don’t see how a peasant travelling at a significant fraction of the speed of light will not obliterate anything he hits (along with himself)

                      D L 2 Replies Last reply
                      4
                      • D dev_null@lemmy.ml

                        Yes it orbits in the movies, that doesn’t conflict with anything I said. I’m describing a scenario where it doesn’t (which doesn’t happen in the movies).

                        A space station with the ability to achieve orbital speeds on it’s own power means it can also negate orbital speeds, before you jump off. And presumably regain them afterwards, if it doesn’t want to also plummet down to the planet.

                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #34

                        Your example was for a space station that doesn’t orbit and you used the death star for that, which does orbit. Does that make sense to you? Cause it’s baffling me

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C chuckleslord@lemmy.world

                          Your example was for a space station that doesn’t orbit and you used the death star for that, which does orbit. Does that make sense to you? Cause it’s baffling me

                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                          dev_null@lemmy.ml
                          wrote last edited by dev_null@lemmy.ml
                          #35

                          No, it was not an example of a station station that doesn’t orbit. It was an example of a mobile space station. I agree it would be baffling to read my comment that way.

                          Here is a rewording if that helps: You could jump off of a station station without worrying about orbital velocity if it wasn’t orbiting. To have a space station that doesn’t orbit, it would have to be a space station with engines, so that it can cancel that velocity. For an example of a station station that has engines, you can look at the Death Star.

                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • C chuckleslord@lemmy.world

                            … the death star orbits. The timer for the rebels to blow it up in a New Hope was how long its orbit would take to clear the moon in its path to the rebel base. The battle of endor was fought over the new death star in orbit over the moon.

                            Yes, the death star is capable of warp, but that just puts it into orbit over different things.

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
                            wrote last edited by
                            #36

                            It can orbit. It doesn’t have to. It’s capable of moving between systems, it’s not confined to a single gravity well.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • A athatet@lemmy.zip

                              Hold up. Didn’t some guy drop balls off a roof to show that things fall at the same speed?

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
                              wrote last edited by
                              #37

                              Shape affects aerodynamics.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D daddledew@lemmy.world

                                That is simply not true. All you have to do is design your projectile in shape, construction and materials so the kinetic energy gets properly used to have the desired effect on the target.

                                A tiny 40 grain .204 Ruger bullet with the insane muzzle velocity of 4100 fps will absolutely explode a watermelon if you use a rapidly expanding projectile such as a ballistic tipped varmint round. If you use the same against a reactive steel target that was only rated for rimfire, it will melt a clean hole through it without even noticeably moving it. And if you use it against a bull moose, it will absolutely destroy a large amount of surface tissue but not achieve enough penetration to reach the internal organs for a clean kill.

                                It isn’t a simple problem, the are many different types of dynamics that you can encounter depending on the nature of the projectile, velocity and target.

                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                D This user is from outside of this forum
                                dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
                                wrote last edited by dragontypewyvern@midwest.social
                                #38

                                This is simply true, you do lose potential energy transfer if the bullet exits, that’s how it can exit, that’s just not usually the point of a bullet, and generally speaking making exit wounds is considered a positive.

                                Now if you want to design a bullet that explodes inside a wound causing mass trauma and an incredibly difficult surgery to repair it is a problem, but surely no one would ever deliberately design a weapon to do that! /S

                                Fun Fact: the .50 cal MGs the Soviets supplied to the Vietnamese during the American invasion usually had enough penetrative power to go through the M113 APC’s aluminum hull…

                                Once. And then it would bounce around inside.

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                10
                                • D dev_null@lemmy.ml

                                  No, it was not an example of a station station that doesn’t orbit. It was an example of a mobile space station. I agree it would be baffling to read my comment that way.

                                  Here is a rewording if that helps: You could jump off of a station station without worrying about orbital velocity if it wasn’t orbiting. To have a space station that doesn’t orbit, it would have to be a space station with engines, so that it can cancel that velocity. For an example of a station station that has engines, you can look at the Death Star.

                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by chuckleslord@lemmy.world
                                  #39

                                  Oh! That’s the confusion. The Death Star wouldn’t be able to cancel out is orbital velocity in any meaningful time frame, but I get what you’re saying. Its engines are tiny compared to its size.

                                  It’s comparable to saying the ISS is a mobile space station because it can use the engines on the Soyuz to adjust its orbit (in terms of thrust to weight, not mechanics, since the Death Star has its own engines)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Cast FistI I Cast Fist

                                    The obvious use of the peasant railgun is instant delivery. Gonna start my new enterprise, pFood, coming at you within 1 turn or your money back!

                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                                    archpawn@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #40

                                    It even works with people. They can carry up to 150 pounds if you have them move 30 feet before passing it to the next guy or 300 pounds if they’re moving 5 feet. I call it the peasant railway.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • T traceur402@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                                      If a character has 121hp or more they’re able to jump from a space station onto earth with like a super hero landing??

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      archpawn@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #41

                                      No. They’d need a pretty impressive jump height to slow down enough to leave orbit.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A AwesomeLowlander

                                        Well I’m being tongue in cheek, but I don’t see how a peasant travelling at a significant fraction of the speed of light will not obliterate anything he hits (along with himself)

                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #42

                                        I know, I was playing on the joke. Not obvious enough apparently.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • D dragontypewyvern@midwest.social

                                          This is simply true, you do lose potential energy transfer if the bullet exits, that’s how it can exit, that’s just not usually the point of a bullet, and generally speaking making exit wounds is considered a positive.

                                          Now if you want to design a bullet that explodes inside a wound causing mass trauma and an incredibly difficult surgery to repair it is a problem, but surely no one would ever deliberately design a weapon to do that! /S

                                          Fun Fact: the .50 cal MGs the Soviets supplied to the Vietnamese during the American invasion usually had enough penetrative power to go through the M113 APC’s aluminum hull…

                                          Once. And then it would bounce around inside.

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          daddledew@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by daddledew@lemmy.world
                                          #43

                                          I don’t see the point you’re trying to make here. You sound like you’re trying to disprove my point that more velocity won’t necessarily equate to overpenetration and “penciling through” with minimal damage but you all you did is explain that overpenetration means unused kinetic energy. Which is usually true depending on the situation but doesn’t disprove what I said.

                                          The rest is just unrelated edgy statements. But yeah, downvote me. What the fuck do I know, I’ve only worked for 15 years in weapons and ballistics.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post