Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. But at least we only spent a trillion dollars on it, right?

But at least we only spent a trillion dollars on it, right?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
91 Posts 46 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AaronH Aaron

    @Steve

    I wasn't aware there was a movement already! I've been trying to start one myself. Thanks!

    @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista

    Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
    Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
    Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:
    wrote last edited by
    #77

    @hosford42 @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista No worries, it's hard to tell. "Solidarity economy" is a rather broad term, encompassing co-ops, fair trade, and to a certain extent, small, local businesses.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

      @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista I'd argue that working at and shopping at co-ops is a short-term solution AND and a long-term solution. Changes to the law are few and far between, inconsistently enforced, and in danger of being repealed. Expanding the presence of co-ops in the economy is a solution with both breadth and depth.

      As for spreading the word, I'd love to refer you to a group I'm part of, GEO (geo.coop), which exists for just this reason. The website is crammed full of useful information, and I'm coordinating the relaunch of our print journal.

      JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
      JenniferplusplusJ This user is from outside of this forum
      Jenniferplusplus
      wrote last edited by
      #78

      @Steve @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista
      If you're looking for a USA perspective, we need to change the laws here, first. US law is quite hostile to cooperatives. It's all organized around creating and sustaining corporations owned by shareholders.

      In most cases, the closest you can get to creating a coop in this country is to establish an LLC with bylaws that require all owners to also work for the company. Established companies can sometimes transition to cooperatives, but that's a much longer and more difficult path.

      AaronH Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

        @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista I'd argue that working at and shopping at co-ops is a short-term solution AND and a long-term solution. Changes to the law are few and far between, inconsistently enforced, and in danger of being repealed. Expanding the presence of co-ops in the economy is a solution with both breadth and depth.

        As for spreading the word, I'd love to refer you to a group I'm part of, GEO (geo.coop), which exists for just this reason. The website is crammed full of useful information, and I'm coordinating the relaunch of our print journal.

        AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
        AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
        Aaron
        wrote last edited by
        #79

        @Steve

        I will definitely check it out!

        Regarding the law, what I would shoot for is *at minimum* a strong preferential treatment for cooperatives. Better yet: a hard requirement that all businesses be either cooperatives or single proprietorships. In that case, it would be a permanent fix -- permanent being interpreted loosely here as, "for as long as the governing body itself continues to function properly".

        Imagine if we didn't even have a stock market to be unstable, create bubbles, or collapse!

        @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

          @Steve @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista
          If you're looking for a USA perspective, we need to change the laws here, first. US law is quite hostile to cooperatives. It's all organized around creating and sustaining corporations owned by shareholders.

          In most cases, the closest you can get to creating a coop in this country is to establish an LLC with bylaws that require all owners to also work for the company. Established companies can sometimes transition to cooperatives, but that's a much longer and more difficult path.

          AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
          AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
          Aaron
          wrote last edited by
          #80

          @jenniferplusplus

          Yes, #Exit2Community / #e2c should definitely be pushed for. I'd love it if we could ever reach the point where it's the actual workers that get to decide, too -- as in, "We took a vote, and you are selling your company in its entirety to us at a fair market price now, to become a cooperative."

          @Steve @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

          Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

            @Steve @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista
            If you're looking for a USA perspective, we need to change the laws here, first. US law is quite hostile to cooperatives. It's all organized around creating and sustaining corporations owned by shareholders.

            In most cases, the closest you can get to creating a coop in this country is to establish an LLC with bylaws that require all owners to also work for the company. Established companies can sometimes transition to cooperatives, but that's a much longer and more difficult path.

            Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
            Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
            Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:
            wrote last edited by
            #81

            @jenniferplusplus @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista Incorporation laws vary by state. Some are very friendly to co-ops (Wisconsin, Colorado, Illinois, and a couple more), and most are not. However, you can incorporate in a state you don't live or work in. It's pretty rare, but it can happen.

            AaronH 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • AaronH Aaron

              @jenniferplusplus

              Yes, #Exit2Community / #e2c should definitely be pushed for. I'd love it if we could ever reach the point where it's the actual workers that get to decide, too -- as in, "We took a vote, and you are selling your company in its entirety to us at a fair market price now, to become a cooperative."

              @Steve @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

              Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
              Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
              Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:
              wrote last edited by
              #82

              @hosford42 @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista I don't know of any provision in existing law that would allow workers to force this. Possession is nine tenths of the law. On the other hands, thousands of businesses are sold each year, and thousands more simply close down. Many could pass seamlessly into the hands of their workers.

              AaronH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

                @Alsy @hosford42 @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista You can start by joining a local co-op, or maybe start a new one.

                AlsyA This user is from outside of this forum
                AlsyA This user is from outside of this forum
                Alsy
                wrote last edited by
                #83

                @Steve @hosford42 @Doomed_Daniel @jenniferplusplus @ireneista Thank you - this is a great, immediately actionable idea.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

                  @jenniferplusplus @hosford42 @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista Incorporation laws vary by state. Some are very friendly to co-ops (Wisconsin, Colorado, Illinois, and a couple more), and most are not. However, you can incorporate in a state you don't live or work in. It's pretty rare, but it can happen.

                  AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
                  AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
                  Aaron
                  wrote last edited by
                  #84

                  @Steve

                  It's actually super common for C corps, I think. They call them "Delaware corps" because that seems to be the place everyone registers in. I'm guessing there's a lot less of a common standard for cooperatives, though.

                  @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

                  Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JenniferplusplusJ Jenniferplusplus

                    What's a capital strike? That tends to be the question I get in response to this rant.

                    You know what a labor strike is, right? It's wielding labor as power, by witholding it, as a bargaining tactic.

                    A capital strike is the same thing, except with capital.

                    audioflyer79🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈A This user is from outside of this forum
                    audioflyer79🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈A This user is from outside of this forum
                    audioflyer79🇺🇦🇨🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍🌈
                    wrote last edited by
                    #85

                    @jenniferplusplus what are you saying is the motivation or purpose for the capital strike?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

                      @hosford42 @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista I don't know of any provision in existing law that would allow workers to force this. Possession is nine tenths of the law. On the other hands, thousands of businesses are sold each year, and thousands more simply close down. Many could pass seamlessly into the hands of their workers.

                      AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
                      AaronH This user is from outside of this forum
                      Aaron
                      wrote last edited by
                      #86

                      @Steve

                      Yeah, it's not a thing, to my knowledge. That's just me dreaming.

                      @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

                      Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • AaronH Aaron

                        @Steve

                        It's actually super common for C corps, I think. They call them "Delaware corps" because that seems to be the place everyone registers in. I'm guessing there's a lot less of a common standard for cooperatives, though.

                        @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

                        Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
                        Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:
                        wrote last edited by
                        #87

                        @hosford42 @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista Exactly. I think @ntnsndr once said he wanted Colorado to be the Delaware of co-ops.

                        Nathan SchneiderN 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • AaronH Aaron

                          @Steve

                          Yeah, it's not a thing, to my knowledge. That's just me dreaming.

                          @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista

                          Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
                          Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S This user is from outside of this forum
                          Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:
                          wrote last edited by
                          #88

                          @hosford42 @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista The closest thing would be a right of first refusal, where if a business owner planned to sell, they would be required by law to offer it to their workers before anyone else. At fair-market value, to be sure, but that's all anyone has ever expected.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:S Stephen Dioxide :TwinPines:

                            @hosford42 @jenniferplusplus @Alsy @Doomed_Daniel @ireneista Exactly. I think @ntnsndr once said he wanted Colorado to be the Delaware of co-ops.

                            Nathan SchneiderN This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nathan SchneiderN This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nathan Schneider
                            wrote last edited by
                            #89

                            Actually now that is a registered trademark of Jason Wiener's firm:)

                            Colorado really does have some important advantages, including flexible statutes and experienced lawyers.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • GregG Greg

                              @jenniferplusplus equating "capitalism" with "trade" has been one of the biggest coups of discourse - you get people sincerely believing "well without capitalism would we just barter???" and now we must start everything by explaining that no, money was invented in 3000 BC, in fact Jesus was overturning moneylender tables 1500 years before the Dutch East India Company, etc

                              GrovewestG This user is from outside of this forum
                              GrovewestG This user is from outside of this forum
                              Grovewest
                              wrote last edited by
                              #90

                              @greg @jenniferplusplus It's also equating capitalism with ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’. Capitalism existed before the US representative democracy. Up until the twentieth century it was closer to and existed alongside Feudalism, hardly free or democratic. The one thing the leaders of any country on earth will not tolerate is a truly national or global labor union. The Solidarity Union in Poland is an extrodinary example of one that had success.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S ShadSterling

                                @jenniferplusplus capitalism is always a denial-of-service attack on human potential; it’s not always this direct

                                Jo with elbows up & chin upJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jo with elbows up & chin upJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Jo with elbows up & chin up
                                wrote last edited by
                                #91

                                @ShadSterling @jenniferplusplus

                                This so much. I miss the things in the world, in my life, that never were, but ought to be.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Pteryx the Puzzle SecretaryP Pteryx the Puzzle Secretary shared this topic

                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                • First post
                                  Last post