Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Combat vs RP

Combat vs RP

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
38 Posts 28 Posters 300 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V verdigris@lemmy.ml

    Combat can be fun, but DnD in particular reeaaally drags sometimes. An excellent DM helps, but even Dimension 20 takes a full session for a big combat encounter, which is usually just exhausting IMO. I much prefer systems like PBTA that keep combat pretty breezy and improv-friendly.

    adrius@ttrpg.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
    adrius@ttrpg.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
    adrius@ttrpg.network
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    B/X is good. When characters have d6 hp and it’s instant death at 0 the combat becomes way more serious and tense.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K kichae@lemmy.ca

      I also (don’t lynch me) think that combat should be an RP experience. That could be my love for certain systems where you get bonuses for good, accurate descriptions and not simply, “I roll. I hit. I do X damage.”

      Combat should be a RP experience regardless of system. What you’re describing is one where proactive roleplay is a mechanical system, and I’ll be honest, as someone who’s never entertained a theatre career, fuck that god awful fucking noise. But the choice of what to do, and how you react after the roll should be informed by the fiction of the game and the fiction of the combat, and that is roleplay.

      The fact that much of the discourse around the games and resources available to players is focused on min/maxing number munchers is a social problem, not a system one.

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      goodlucktofriends@lemmy.today
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      Fair enough, but I think as long as you don’t let it extend to where players are trying to do things that they shouldn’t with their actions, encouraging them to describe their character flicking a sword around the opponent’s shield strap is encouraging them to engage with the scenario in a different way than just seeing stat numbers listed on a square.

      I also think that the reactions in combat are exactly what you should be after. I love seeing a player take the ‘nontactical’ move that isn’t what they designed it to do (so a rushing charger kill everything in one hit character taking a shielding action).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • The Picard ManeuverT The Picard Maneuver
        This post did not contain any content.
        Link Preview Image
        maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
        maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
        maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        I DMed a lot of shadowrun, and I really do love both of them equally. RP makes the world fun and meaningful, while combat gives it physicality, makes it real.

        I miss it, if only I could afford to spend 10 hours on prep every week :<

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone

          I DMed a lot of shadowrun, and I really do love both of them equally. RP makes the world fun and meaningful, while combat gives it physicality, makes it real.

          I miss it, if only I could afford to spend 10 hours on prep every week :<

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          tempermentalanomaly@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          I’ll expand this and say encounters. Sneaking past a patrol, disarming a trap, or charming a suspicious cook having a break at the service entrance… Those encounters often require some rp, but damn if there aren’t stakes.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V verdigris@lemmy.ml

            Combat can be fun, but DnD in particular reeaaally drags sometimes. An excellent DM helps, but even Dimension 20 takes a full session for a big combat encounter, which is usually just exhausting IMO. I much prefer systems like PBTA that keep combat pretty breezy and improv-friendly.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            confusedbythebasics@lemm.ee
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            Most ttrpgs are a roleplaying game glued to a strategy game and we flip flop between the games as we play. PBTA is a roleplaying game end to end. I love it with a group that enjoys roleplaying and doesn’t care for strategy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

              Personally I find adding a lot of flavor that has no mechanical impact kind of distracting and tiresome in a different way. Like, sure, it sounds cool you slashed their ankles or whatever, but if it doesn’t do anything I need to discard that. I can’t, in most systems, then be like “ok he just got stabbed in the leg he’s off balance. I can take advantage of that!”. It’s just noise.

              Some people have been like “You just don’t have any imagination!” but it’s not that. It’s that the flavor stuff is often actively not true, and it’s tiresome to hold two separate world states in mind at the same time. One where the fighter just stabbed the guy in the hand and threw sand in his eyes, and the other where he hit for 5 damage and his hand + eyes are fine.

              (Contrast Fate, which explicitly encourages you to be creative about the scene, and lets you mechanically benefit as well.)

              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              confusedbythebasics@lemm.ee
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              Exactly this. Well said. I don’t understand why people love the long meaningless descriptions. Does FATE narrative always match the mechanics like PBTA does?

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C confusedbythebasics@lemm.ee

                Exactly this. Well said. I don’t understand why people love the long meaningless descriptions. Does FATE narrative always match the mechanics like PBTA does?

                J This user is from outside of this forum
                J This user is from outside of this forum
                jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                wrote on last edited by
                #33

                I don’t know PBTA well but I believe so.

                Basically, every scene and character can have ‘aspects’, which are things that are true about them. They’re free form. Sometimes they’re just there, like if you’re in a bar it might have “Bubbling with drunk banter” or “Loud Pop Punk Soundtrack”. Aspects can then affect what makes sense in the scene. “Loud Pop Punk” can make it easier to move without being heard, but harder to make a speech because no one can hear you, for example.

                You can also explicitly create aspects. Turn off the jukebox and the aspect might change to “Weirdly Quiet Bar” or whatever. In a fight, you can use the “create an advantage” move. That’s for stuff that isn’t about taking them out of the conflict right now, but setting things up. Like pushing them off balance, disarming them, screaming “LOOK! A DISTRACTION!” whatever. If the roll comes out if your favor, you can create an aspect that’s true and can also be invoked for a numeric bonus on a dice roll. So if you pants the guy you’re fighting, he can’t run full speed to chase you because his pants are down. You can also invoke that if you want to kick his ass, for a bonus on the dice roll.

                These are all free form and it’s up to the group to decide what it actually means. Most groups probably wouldn’t let you invoke “I’m literally on fire!!” as a bonus if you’re trying to sneak through a crowd.

                Typically, as I understand it, you’re either trying to take them out of the fight or trying to create advantages for side of the conflict. On a dramatic success on trying to take someone out, you can also create a small advantage.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • The Picard ManeuverT The Picard Maneuver
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  Link Preview Image
                  atlas48@ttrpg.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
                  atlas48@ttrpg.networkA This user is from outside of this forum
                  atlas48@ttrpg.network
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  Come play World of Darkness, where that’s the main focus!

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jjjalljs@ttrpg.network

                    Personally I find adding a lot of flavor that has no mechanical impact kind of distracting and tiresome in a different way. Like, sure, it sounds cool you slashed their ankles or whatever, but if it doesn’t do anything I need to discard that. I can’t, in most systems, then be like “ok he just got stabbed in the leg he’s off balance. I can take advantage of that!”. It’s just noise.

                    Some people have been like “You just don’t have any imagination!” but it’s not that. It’s that the flavor stuff is often actively not true, and it’s tiresome to hold two separate world states in mind at the same time. One where the fighter just stabbed the guy in the hand and threw sand in his eyes, and the other where he hit for 5 damage and his hand + eyes are fine.

                    (Contrast Fate, which explicitly encourages you to be creative about the scene, and lets you mechanically benefit as well.)

                    klaymore@sh.itjust.worksK This user is from outside of this forum
                    klaymore@sh.itjust.worksK This user is from outside of this forum
                    klaymore@sh.itjust.works
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    This is one thing cool about DCC (among several), that warriors can attempt a mighty deed along with their attack to get extra effects, like slashing their ankles, throwing sand in their eyes, swinging from a chandelier or anything else. Then the GM decides what effect it has. It makes warriors a lot more bad-ass than just whack whack whack.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • atlas48@ttrpg.networkA atlas48@ttrpg.network

                      Come play World of Darkness, where that’s the main focus!

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      blackbelt352@ttrpg.network
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      Imo WoD I feel gets the right balance of RP and streamlined combat with optional additional rules if they are needed. I’m also generally a firm believer in combat means all other forms of diplomacy has failed. I also love that no matter how strong you are, everyone has 7 points of health they can take (but there are ways of getting around that especially for mages)

                      And for all the good and bad that the 5e splats that Paradox is putting out, the “3 rounds and call it” philosophy of combat is something I enjoy immensely.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • The Picard ManeuverT The Picard Maneuver
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        Link Preview Image
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        dlan@ttrpg.network
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #37

                        People will say this and still only play Dungeon Combat Game 5e rather than 1 of a thousand systems designed for exactly the type of player they are lmao

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • The Picard ManeuverT The Picard Maneuver
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          Link Preview Image
                          phase@lemmy.8th.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phase@lemmy.8th.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                          phase@lemmy.8th.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          I just want the story to move forward.

                          Also, having a combat in 2 rolls build tension for when you can, in fact, avoid the combat.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • System shared this topic on

                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post