Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. PC Gaming
  3. A new 7GHz+ AMD Ryzen gaming CPU is reportedly on the cards for next year

A new 7GHz+ AMD Ryzen gaming CPU is reportedly on the cards for next year

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PC Gaming
pcgaming
15 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D dubiousx99@lemmy.world

    P=C*V^2^*f

    Power increases linearly with frequency.

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    allhailthesheep@sh.itjust.works
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    I mean, a few years ago we had 1ghz CPUs with a 60w TDP. now you can do 3 or 4 or sometimes even more with the same tdp. it’s not all about the power.

    Q 1 Reply Last reply
    13
    • D dubiousx99@lemmy.world

      P=C*V^2^*f

      Power increases linearly with frequency.

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      supramario@lemmy.world
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Not even close to true, as others have said we even have chips from AMD that use less power and are faster than even their last gen versions. The 9700x has a tdp of 65w while the 7700x last gen version of this same like is 105w. So no this isn’t true at all.

      1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • A allhailthesheep@sh.itjust.works

        I mean, a few years ago we had 1ghz CPUs with a 60w TDP. now you can do 3 or 4 or sometimes even more with the same tdp. it’s not all about the power.

        Q This user is from outside of this forum
        Q This user is from outside of this forum
        qaz
        wrote on last edited by qaz@lemmy.world
        #8

        The N100 goes up to 3.4GHz and has a TDP of 6W

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        12
        • B bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com

          Please stop trying to boil our oceans.

          ShadowedcrossS This user is from outside of this forum
          ShadowedcrossS This user is from outside of this forum
          Shadowedcross
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Weird take.

          1 Reply Last reply
          6
          • alessandro@lemmy.caA alessandro@lemmy.ca
            This post did not contain any content.
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            thefrogthatflies@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            Steam Deck 2 confirmed!

            (Joking, it’s not)

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • D dubiousx99@lemmy.world

              P=C*V^2^*f

              Power increases linearly with frequency.

              RomkslrquszR This user is from outside of this forum
              RomkslrquszR This user is from outside of this forum
              Romkslrqusz
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              2008: Core 2 Quad Q9400 - 4c4t, 2666Mhz @ 95W TDP

              2023: N100 - 4c4t, 3400Mhz @ 122W 6W TDP

              1 Reply Last reply
              17
              • Q qaz

                The N100 goes up to 3.4GHz and has a TDP of 6W

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                allhailthesheep@sh.itjust.works
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                wow that’s insanely impressive! I haven’t seen any of those chips in the wild yet so I wasn’t aware of it. super cool stuff

                Q 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • A allhailthesheep@sh.itjust.works

                  wow that’s insanely impressive! I haven’t seen any of those chips in the wild yet so I wasn’t aware of it. super cool stuff

                  Q This user is from outside of this forum
                  Q This user is from outside of this forum
                  qaz
                  wrote on last edited by qaz@lemmy.world
                  #13

                  They’re not found in traditional PC’s and are attached directly to the motherboard itself. They’re meant for mobile / embedded but are quite popular for servers in the selfhosting community due to their low power usage, price, and performance. It’s comparable to a i5-7500T in terms of performance (so not that fast), but it does have better video encoding acceleration which makes it suitable for streaming video. Due to the availability and prices of Raspberry Pi kits, these are often chosen instead for simple servers because mini-PC’s with it can cost the same as a Raspberry Pi kit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • alessandro@lemmy.caA alessandro@lemmy.ca
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    werecat@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    “According to MLID…”… Ok, base article on a YTuber that has new ridiculous rumours for each 8 day of the week

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    10
                    • cecilkorik@lemmy.caC cecilkorik@lemmy.ca

                      IF all else remains constant. Which it doesn’t, and isn’t.

                      Do you have any idea how significant of an improvement it is for AMD to bring their process node to this level? All the variables going to be different here, and it’s too early to tell what that means until we see the actual silicon.

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      dubiousx99@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Correct. I never stated anything different. I was replying to the statement that “high clock speeds and high wattage are not related” when clearly frequency affects the power output in a linear fashion. Of course changing a manufacturing process is going to likely change the capacitance but the biggest savings in thermal has been the decrease in voltage as the process have shrunk.

                      I don’t get the downvotes though. I posted an accurate, relevant formula to the discussion and stated a factual statement.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post