Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Trump bullied Canada over ‘digital taxes’ – and Ottawa submitted

Trump bullied Canada over ‘digital taxes’ – and Ottawa submitted

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
51 Posts 31 Posters 242 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R rumimevlevi@lemmings.world

    When the majority keep saying npd is never going to win so i will not voting for them of course they will never win. Of you kwep voting for the same two parties thst failed multiple time, the country will keep getting worse

    Z This user is from outside of this forum
    Z This user is from outside of this forum
    zacpod@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    Hard agree. But it’s a function of FPTP. If we had a better voting system (like Trudeau promised!) then a lot more people could vote their conscience instead of doing strategic voting. But until then, voting strategically is often the best move.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T typotyper@sh.itjust.works

      I also think it gives him a small bit of leverage too. They can always be reinstated the taxes since it was a 2020(?) bill with a deferred effective date

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      skozzii@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #43

      Yes if they don’t get what they want or Trump is unreasonable they can certainly bring them right back.

      This is a huge bargaining chip, and the Americans know this too…

      Carney hasnt given us a reason to not believe in his ways yet, as much as the conservative opposition scream foul before anything has begun.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Z zacpod@lemmy.world

        Hard agree. But it’s a function of FPTP. If we had a better voting system (like Trudeau promised!) then a lot more people could vote their conscience instead of doing strategic voting. But until then, voting strategically is often the best move.

        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #44

        Having a bad system mean we should make more efforts to change things with our our hand rather than waiting the government. See all services getting worse and inflation growing witht the status quo we are in

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M melsaskca@lemmy.ca

          Ask 10 economists, you’ll get 10 different answers. But opinions are news now because we need to keep that train rolling in the new 24/7 news economy. My own opinion is that he “capitulated” to get the trade talks started again se he can get past that July 21st deadline and then proceed accordingly.

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
          wrote on last edited by canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
          #45

          Yes, this hasn’t closed the door forever (as far as I can tell), and Carney doesn’t seem like an idiot, so I hold out hope this is some kind of maneuvering, and he’s still as “elbows up” as he was on the campaign trail.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • K karlhungus@lemmy.ca

            Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t

            WHAT. He sold beans for money in his first term, of course he’s making money off of it.

            I don’t think he’s smart enough to actually take advantage of this.

            This is one of his major MO’s making money, maybe he missed the first few times, but he’s done it so much now that he’s for sure making money on these bets, just like every supporter he’s got out there.

            Why do you think he walked away from the table because of the DST, because he cares about gig tech? They paid him – that’s why they got seats at his inauguration.

            And before you say anything, no he will not learn his lesson.

            Disagree, this is a lesson reinforces itself, I bet he continues this way. I’m not saying he’s smart, just greedy.

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            #46

            That’s the thing, he sells shit. He is, in every respect, a glorified used car salesman. He takes garbage and dresses it up into gilded trinkets that he pawns off on the morons who believe in him. He also definitely used Mar-a-Lago as a way to launder bribes from foreign nationals. (Yet another reason why presidents should be constitutionally required to divest everything they own before being allowed to take office.)

            Disagree, this is a lesson reinforces itself, I bet he continues this way. I’m not saying he’s smart, just greedy.

            Trump wants a “win”. He will keep doing what he is doing until he can say “See, I won!”. He is that petty and small minded.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R rumimevlevi@lemmings.world

              Canadian companies, schools and government have deals with microsoft

              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              godoflies@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #47

              And it’s possible to push for change much more easily at this level instead of the federal overnight. TBH - microsoft is used because of the history of how computers were introduced in the NA market. If you look to China for example, they skipped the entire PC generation and went straight to mobile. Windows is not big player but rather things like ‘superapps’ that act more like an OS than an app. That’s only scratching the surface because these apps are much more because they even have financialization (see WePay, AliPay). The other big alternative is MacOS which seems to be catching on in the post-secondary and consumer market this may lead to a change in the business playing field as the older generation retires and younger people move into the workforce.

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G godoflies@lemmy.ca

                And it’s possible to push for change much more easily at this level instead of the federal overnight. TBH - microsoft is used because of the history of how computers were introduced in the NA market. If you look to China for example, they skipped the entire PC generation and went straight to mobile. Windows is not big player but rather things like ‘superapps’ that act more like an OS than an app. That’s only scratching the surface because these apps are much more because they even have financialization (see WePay, AliPay). The other big alternative is MacOS which seems to be catching on in the post-secondary and consumer market this may lead to a change in the business playing field as the older generation retires and younger people move into the workforce.

                R This user is from outside of this forum
                R This user is from outside of this forum
                rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
                wrote on last edited by
                #48

                I understand the use of windows but not other apps and service like microsoft teams

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W wampus@lemmy.ca

                  You’ll never see Canada block big tech at this point I’m afraid. All the talk of sovereignty is just that, talk. None of our different government agencies is prepared to abandon Microsoft. All of our financial regulators are completely in bed with Microsoft. Most of our banks are in bed with Microsoft. Our ATMs run on Windows due to Payments Canada being in bed with Microsoft and mandating it. All of your banking data is accessible by Microsoft. Every government agency runs on Microsoft.

                  Every time there’s an announcement about ditching US providers, ask your MP/MLA if that includes Microsoft / big tech. There’s always an “out” in those announcements to allow them to dodge that one – like “It’s too expensive to change”, or “too difficult to change quickly” or whatever.

                  I mean, look at all these “nation-building” projects that they’re itching to suppress Canadian’s rights to “get moving” – they’re all projects that’re gonna be lead by Big US companies to extract resources from Canada. They put on a good show, but the reality is that Trump / America was right that Canada is basically a little bitch at this point. Our politicians have proven that time and again this year.

                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  godoflies@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #49

                  Oh of course there’s always pain and big tech has always been hard to block or even tax (our government is extremely slow on figuring out tech) - just look at our very own big telecoms - we can’t even get them to behave. Canada has positioned itself into a weak position because we collectively keep voting for these spineless or clueless people believing they are doing good or for private interests. I am sure there is still a large portion of people thinking that politics don’t affect them or they think that their vote won’t matter etc etc. These reasons are all excuses - voting is the just the bare minimum.

                  Canada should have its own GDPR like the EU. Our personal data and things that we put online - one should have sovereignty over it. We have nothing in place that backs our own citizens and this in itself costs Canada nothing. It is pure and simple legislation and can cause pain to big tech without even changing any operating system.

                  Canada got turned into the US’s “little bitch” wasn’t a mistake overnight. Go look at the past 30 years of policies and who voted for what - it’s clear there’s a trend and one political part is almost blatant in bed with the US. There are many other ways to cause pain beyond just digital taxes.

                  Banking wise, I look forward to a day when banks are obsolete via crypto, but this requires a large public understanding of what crypto is all about. I’d argue that the Canadian government has no real way of governing crypto given its nature of how it works. But that’s another discussion.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G godoflies@lemmy.ca

                    Oh of course there’s always pain and big tech has always been hard to block or even tax (our government is extremely slow on figuring out tech) - just look at our very own big telecoms - we can’t even get them to behave. Canada has positioned itself into a weak position because we collectively keep voting for these spineless or clueless people believing they are doing good or for private interests. I am sure there is still a large portion of people thinking that politics don’t affect them or they think that their vote won’t matter etc etc. These reasons are all excuses - voting is the just the bare minimum.

                    Canada should have its own GDPR like the EU. Our personal data and things that we put online - one should have sovereignty over it. We have nothing in place that backs our own citizens and this in itself costs Canada nothing. It is pure and simple legislation and can cause pain to big tech without even changing any operating system.

                    Canada got turned into the US’s “little bitch” wasn’t a mistake overnight. Go look at the past 30 years of policies and who voted for what - it’s clear there’s a trend and one political part is almost blatant in bed with the US. There are many other ways to cause pain beyond just digital taxes.

                    Banking wise, I look forward to a day when banks are obsolete via crypto, but this requires a large public understanding of what crypto is all about. I’d argue that the Canadian government has no real way of governing crypto given its nature of how it works. But that’s another discussion.

                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    wampus@lemmy.ca
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #50

                    Yea, I’m not in favour of crypto banks in any way shape or form. Over the past five years, almost every crypto coin has been blatantly used at some point for large scale fraud, and direct bribes – Trump’s a great case in point there. Even more, shifting monetary control into a crypto-verse, is overtly giving all authority and power to tech bros, who are proving in very overt fashion that they cannot be trusted these days.

                    Just look at SVB. Thiel and his buddies looked at SVB’s balance sheet, said “We have so much money in this bank, if we all pulled out at once we could kill the bank and trigger a regulatory fiasco” … followed by Palmer Luckey, one of that crowd, putting forward a Crypto-first bank with his billionaire buddies backing. So the guys that caused the latest banking collapses, are wanting us to trust them to handle all the monetary stuff. Crypto being beyond government control is a nonstarter, and as soon as govt is involved is basically the same as regular currencies. But even worse the main proponents of it are completely untrustworthy, and are entirely hell bent on dismantling things like democracy. They want the power to mint their own “zuck bucks” to function as official currencies in their little tech fascist fiefdoms. So fuck that noise.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wampus@lemmy.ca

                      Yea, I’m not in favour of crypto banks in any way shape or form. Over the past five years, almost every crypto coin has been blatantly used at some point for large scale fraud, and direct bribes – Trump’s a great case in point there. Even more, shifting monetary control into a crypto-verse, is overtly giving all authority and power to tech bros, who are proving in very overt fashion that they cannot be trusted these days.

                      Just look at SVB. Thiel and his buddies looked at SVB’s balance sheet, said “We have so much money in this bank, if we all pulled out at once we could kill the bank and trigger a regulatory fiasco” … followed by Palmer Luckey, one of that crowd, putting forward a Crypto-first bank with his billionaire buddies backing. So the guys that caused the latest banking collapses, are wanting us to trust them to handle all the monetary stuff. Crypto being beyond government control is a nonstarter, and as soon as govt is involved is basically the same as regular currencies. But even worse the main proponents of it are completely untrustworthy, and are entirely hell bent on dismantling things like democracy. They want the power to mint their own “zuck bucks” to function as official currencies in their little tech fascist fiefdoms. So fuck that noise.

                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                      godoflies@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #51

                      Definitely not crypto banks. I mean more of - people being able to do the transactions themselves straight from their phones or whatnot without the middleman (the banks). That’s how crypto is supposed to work - and people just pay a transaction fee (“gas fees”) to get the transaction done. There’s a lot of work that’s already been done to bring down the cost of gas fees too. Staking is like lending out your money and pooling it together while whoever borrows it has to pay you interest instead of paying the bank interest. There’s a lot of shitcoins and corrupt things with crypto for sure, but that’s a problem people collectively also need to solve - maybe don’t “stake”/lend out your money to shady coins is a start and don’t chase after this big marketed bullshit (FTX scam anyone)? There’s a reason why techbros, wall street etc got in and it’s because they’re circumventing regulation - so looks like the bank even in this current state despite being regulated still do tons of shady shit. The penalties are just the cost of doing business.

                      It’s a dual edged knife. Want to be free from the middleman banks? Current regulation standards don’t even hold a candle against crypto. Crypto is community driven, decentralized and possibly even anti-inflationary. There are a lot of advantages but also in its current form easily perverted. Anyways, going to stop here as we’re off topic.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post