Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. One thing "AI" has in common with cryptocoin that pretty much every posited scenario is disastrous to some degree, just a question of flavour and distribution of said disaster.

One thing "AI" has in common with cryptocoin that pretty much every posited scenario is disastrous to some degree, just a question of flavour and distribution of said disaster.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
    Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
    Baldur Bjarnason
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    One thing "AI" has in common with cryptocoin that pretty much every posited scenario is disastrous to some degree, just a question of flavour and distribution of said disaster.

    If doomers are right: disaster

    If naysayers—"it's dysfunctional"—are right: disaster ("Congrats! all software is broken")

    If "moderate" boosters are right: disaster (mass unemployment)

    If optimists are right: disaster (also mass unemployment)

    If the AGI folks are right: disaster ( "Congrats! Digital chattel slavery")

    Baldur BjarnasonB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • Baldur BjarnasonB Baldur Bjarnason

      One thing "AI" has in common with cryptocoin that pretty much every posited scenario is disastrous to some degree, just a question of flavour and distribution of said disaster.

      If doomers are right: disaster

      If naysayers—"it's dysfunctional"—are right: disaster ("Congrats! all software is broken")

      If "moderate" boosters are right: disaster (mass unemployment)

      If optimists are right: disaster (also mass unemployment)

      If the AGI folks are right: disaster ( "Congrats! Digital chattel slavery")

      Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
      Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
      Baldur Bjarnason
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      In some of the scenarios billionaires do really well and in others they are largely insulated from the worst outcomes. Win-win for them

      For the rest of us they're all bad. The scenarios where the tech is largely dysfunctional are the optimistic ones

      If you posit that "AI" won't work well enough to make up for the costs long term and we realise this early to mitigate for the harms that are already happening then we might get out of this with a functional economy after the hubbub has died down.

      Baldur BjarnasonB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Baldur BjarnasonB Baldur Bjarnason

        In some of the scenarios billionaires do really well and in others they are largely insulated from the worst outcomes. Win-win for them

        For the rest of us they're all bad. The scenarios where the tech is largely dysfunctional are the optimistic ones

        If you posit that "AI" won't work well enough to make up for the costs long term and we realise this early to mitigate for the harms that are already happening then we might get out of this with a functional economy after the hubbub has died down.

        Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
        Baldur BjarnasonB This user is from outside of this forum
        Baldur Bjarnason
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Any scenario where "AI" works well enough to be in wide use long term means mass unemployment, wholesale political capture of media and cultural industries, dysfunctional products, and other continuing large-scale harms

        The thankfully bullshit "AGI" scenario would just be an unending clusterfuck

        Which is why "this is shit and you're a fool for using it" is the optimistic take

        The best case scenario for the rest of us is that we have to clean up after a bunch of fools in the tech industry

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jürgen HubertJ Jürgen Hubert shared this topic

        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post