Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

    contrasocialC This user is from outside of this forum
    contrasocialC This user is from outside of this forum
    contrasocial
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @amydiehl

    Look out! Chuck Schumer is gonna tell the GOP not to do that and then lean back and hope they don't do it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

      nanowizN This user is from outside of this forum
      nanowizN This user is from outside of this forum
      nanowiz
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @amydiehl

      jumpin up and down about this since it passed the House.
      I call my Senators to say I want to hear them sounding off

      #crickets

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

        @amydiehl@mstdn.social That could backfire on them. I saw it asserted a day or two ago that without white women voting disproportionately conservative, no conservative would have won election in the last century.

        I don't know how
        true the assertion is.

        [UPDATE (see below): Looks like it's not.]

        Eric deRuiterR This user is from outside of this forum
        Eric deRuiterR This user is from outside of this forum
        Eric deRuiter
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

        2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

        2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

        Sean FenianZ JonathanJ Fight Fascism #RESISTY 3 Replies Last reply
        0
        • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

          SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
          https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

          Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
          Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
          Nicole Parsons
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @amydiehl

          It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

          The fossil fuel industry.

          Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

          All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

          Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
          https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

          Link Preview Image
          Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

          The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

          favicon

          Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

          Link Preview Image
          Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

          The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

          favicon

          Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

          Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

          1/

          libramoonL Nicole ParsonsN LeBonkL 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

            @amydiehl

            It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

            The fossil fuel industry.

            Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

            All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

            Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
            https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

            Link Preview Image
            Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

            The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

            favicon

            Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

            The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

            favicon

            Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

            Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

            1/

            libramoonL This user is from outside of this forum
            libramoonL This user is from outside of this forum
            libramoon
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @Npars01 @amydiehl

            observe the amazing power of women that these so-called powerful men so greatly fear

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

              SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
              https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

              MegatronicThronBanksM This user is from outside of this forum
              MegatronicThronBanksM This user is from outside of this forum
              MegatronicThronBanks
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @amydiehl

              yeah first thing the Backlash administration has to do is re-enfranchise all US voters

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                @amydiehl

                It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

                The fossil fuel industry.

                Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

                All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

                Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
                https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

                Link Preview Image
                Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

                The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

                favicon

                Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

                Link Preview Image
                Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

                The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

                favicon

                Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

                1/

                Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nicole Parsons
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                2/

                ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

                Link Preview Image
                Republican against child marriage ban calls teens "ripe, fertile"

                Lawmaker Jess Edwards opposed a child marriage ban and described teens as being of a "ripe, fertile" age.

                favicon

                Newsweek (www.newsweek.com)

                Link Preview Image
                Why Are Some Republican Lawmakers Hellbent on Preserving Child Marriage?

                GOP lawmakers across the U.S. have opposed raising the marriage age, with some arguing child marriage bans would encourage abortion.

                favicon

                Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

                Link Preview Image
                Republicans Are Really Into This Whole Child Marriage Thing

                Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

                favicon

                Jezebel (www.jezebel.com)

                They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

                They fund efforts at male supremacy

                Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                  David CroyleC This user is from outside of this forum
                  David CroyleC This user is from outside of this forum
                  David Croyle
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @amydiehl More absolute ratf*ckery.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                    2/

                    ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

                    Link Preview Image
                    Republican against child marriage ban calls teens "ripe, fertile"

                    Lawmaker Jess Edwards opposed a child marriage ban and described teens as being of a "ripe, fertile" age.

                    favicon

                    Newsweek (www.newsweek.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Why Are Some Republican Lawmakers Hellbent on Preserving Child Marriage?

                    GOP lawmakers across the U.S. have opposed raising the marriage age, with some arguing child marriage bans would encourage abortion.

                    favicon

                    Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Republicans Are Really Into This Whole Child Marriage Thing

                    Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

                    favicon

                    Jezebel (www.jezebel.com)

                    They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

                    They fund efforts at male supremacy

                    Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                    Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                    Nicole Parsons
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    3/

                    forbes.com

                    favicon

                    (www.forbes.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Project 2025: Affirmative action

                    Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

                    favicon

                    The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

                    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                    Link Preview Image
                    The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

                    Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

                    favicon

                    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                    Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
                    https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

                    Link Preview Image
                    A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

                    The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

                    favicon

                    Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

                    Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

                    favicon

                    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

                    Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

                    favicon

                    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

                    Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

                    favicon

                    Truthout (truthout.org)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

                    Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

                    favicon

                    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

                    Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

                    favicon

                    the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                    forbes.com

                    favicon

                    (www.forbes.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

                    The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

                    favicon

                    (subscriber.politicopro.com)

                    forbes.com

                    favicon

                    (www.forbes.com)

                    Link Preview Image
                    ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

                    Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

                    favicon

                    the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                    Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                      3/

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Project 2025: Affirmative action

                      Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

                      favicon

                      The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

                      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

                      Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

                      favicon

                      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                      Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
                      https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

                      Link Preview Image
                      A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

                      The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

                      favicon

                      Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

                      Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

                      favicon

                      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

                      Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

                      favicon

                      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

                      Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

                      favicon

                      Truthout (truthout.org)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

                      Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

                      favicon

                      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

                      Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

                      The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

                      favicon

                      (subscriber.politicopro.com)

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

                      Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                      Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                      Nicole Parsons
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      4/

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

                      Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

                      favicon

                      Progressive.org (progressive.org)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

                      Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

                      favicon

                      SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

                      favicon

                      Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

                      Link Preview Image
                      ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

                      Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

                      favicon

                      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                      Link Preview Image
                      The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

                      There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

                      favicon

                      Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

                      https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

                      Link Preview Image
                      Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

                      The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

                      favicon

                      HNN (www.hnn.us)

                      The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
                      https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

                      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

                      Just a moment...

                      favicon

                      (kansasreflector.com)

                      forbes.com

                      favicon

                      (www.forbes.com)

                      Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                        4/

                        Link Preview Image
                        The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

                        Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

                        favicon

                        Progressive.org (progressive.org)

                        Link Preview Image
                        Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

                        Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

                        favicon

                        SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

                        Link Preview Image
                        The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

                        favicon

                        Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

                        Link Preview Image
                        ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

                        Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

                        favicon

                        the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                        Link Preview Image
                        The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

                        There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

                        favicon

                        Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

                        https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

                        Link Preview Image
                        Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

                        The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

                        favicon

                        HNN (www.hnn.us)

                        The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
                        https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

                        forbes.com

                        favicon

                        (www.forbes.com)

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

                        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

                        Just a moment...

                        favicon

                        (kansasreflector.com)

                        forbes.com

                        favicon

                        (www.forbes.com)

                        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                        Nicole Parsons
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        5/

                        Link Preview Image
                        Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really. - Legal Planet

                        At Legal Planet, we often bemoan and gnash our teeth at the Unitary Executive Theory, which supposedly holds that because “the Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States,” Congress can not circumscribe the President’s removal authority or even his  ability to manage federal agencies in any way. But last week, … Continue reading "Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really."

                        favicon

                        Legal Planet (legal-planet.org)

                        Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.

                        https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/project-2025-billionaire-donor-heritage-foundation-donald-trump-jd-vance-charles-koch-peter-coors/

                        People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
                        https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/

                        https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/

                        Link Preview Image
                        Climate science deniers at forefront of downplaying coronavirus pandemic

                        Vocal influencers such as the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and the Heartland Institute are hitting back at a time when people’s trust in science is rising

                        favicon

                        the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                        Link Preview Image
                        How Donald Trump Kingmaker-Billionaires Robert and Rebekah Mercer Have Poured Millions Into Climate Science Denial

                        When it comes to climate science denial, some names come easily and deservingly to mind. There’s oil giant ExxonMobil — a company that contributed millions of dollars to organizations that told the public there was no risk from burning fossil fuels. There are the oil billionaire Koch brothers — Charles and David — and their ideological zeal against […]

                        favicon

                        DeSmog (www.desmog.com)

                        Link Preview Image
                        How to Cause a Dysfunctional Government

                        On RFK, Jr., Trump v. Slaughter, and the serious flaw of the right’s unitary executive theory.

                        favicon

                        The Texas Observer (www.texasobserver.org)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Eric deRuiterR Eric deRuiter

                          @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

                          2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

                          2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

                          Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          Sean Fenian
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

                          Sean LynchS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                            Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
                            Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
                            Mania Emma
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            @amydiehl #patriarchy

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘A ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘

                              @amydiehl For a nation that advertises itself as a bastion of democracy, Americans put a lot of effort into denying people their right to vote.
                              I prefer our system, where you get in trouble if you *don't* vote. It's inclusive.

                              Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
                              Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
                              Alex Rosenberg
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                                KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                                KanaMauna
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @amydiehl

                                For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.

                                BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                  Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Edelruth In The Wrong Timeline
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @amydiehl

                                  This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                    Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Paul Healey
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                      Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Hannah Steenbock
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @amydiehl

                                      Another way of skewing elections to the right.

                                      Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.

                                      This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.

                                      But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                        MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MusiqueNow :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @amydiehl

                                        🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨#ALERT

                                        #votersuppression #USElections #TransAndNonBinaryrRightsAreHumanRights

                                        #womansrights #ElectionStealing #SAVEAct

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                                          @amydiehl

                                          It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

                                          The fossil fuel industry.

                                          Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

                                          All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

                                          Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
                                          https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

                                          The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

                                          favicon

                                          Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

                                          The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

                                          favicon

                                          Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                                          Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

                                          1/

                                          LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          LeBonk
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @Npars01 @amydiehl Look how scared they get when half the population is 6% less in favor of their scam

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post