Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

    @amydiehl

    It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

    The fossil fuel industry.

    Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

    All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

    Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
    https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

    Link Preview Image
    Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

    The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

    favicon

    Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

    The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

    favicon

    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

    Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

    1/

    libramoonL This user is from outside of this forum
    libramoonL This user is from outside of this forum
    libramoon
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @Npars01 @amydiehl

    observe the amazing power of women that these so-called powerful men so greatly fear

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

      MegatronicThronBanksM This user is from outside of this forum
      MegatronicThronBanksM This user is from outside of this forum
      MegatronicThronBanks
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @amydiehl

      yeah first thing the Backlash administration has to do is re-enfranchise all US voters

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

        @amydiehl

        It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

        The fossil fuel industry.

        Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

        All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

        Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
        https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

        Link Preview Image
        Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

        The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

        favicon

        Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

        Link Preview Image
        Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

        The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

        favicon

        Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

        Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

        1/

        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
        Nicole Parsons
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        2/

        ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

        Link Preview Image
        Republican against child marriage ban calls teens "ripe, fertile"

        Lawmaker Jess Edwards opposed a child marriage ban and described teens as being of a "ripe, fertile" age.

        favicon

        Newsweek (www.newsweek.com)

        Link Preview Image
        Why Are Some Republican Lawmakers Hellbent on Preserving Child Marriage?

        GOP lawmakers across the U.S. have opposed raising the marriage age, with some arguing child marriage bans would encourage abortion.

        favicon

        Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

        Link Preview Image
        Republicans Are Really Into This Whole Child Marriage Thing

        Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

        favicon

        Jezebel (www.jezebel.com)

        They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

        They fund efforts at male supremacy

        Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

          SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
          https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

          David CroyleC This user is from outside of this forum
          David CroyleC This user is from outside of this forum
          David Croyle
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @amydiehl More absolute ratf*ckery.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

            2/

            ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

            Link Preview Image
            Republican against child marriage ban calls teens "ripe, fertile"

            Lawmaker Jess Edwards opposed a child marriage ban and described teens as being of a "ripe, fertile" age.

            favicon

            Newsweek (www.newsweek.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Why Are Some Republican Lawmakers Hellbent on Preserving Child Marriage?

            GOP lawmakers across the U.S. have opposed raising the marriage age, with some arguing child marriage bans would encourage abortion.

            favicon

            Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Republicans Are Really Into This Whole Child Marriage Thing

            Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

            favicon

            Jezebel (www.jezebel.com)

            They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

            They fund efforts at male supremacy

            Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
            Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
            Nicole Parsons
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            3/

            forbes.com

            favicon

            (www.forbes.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Project 2025: Affirmative action

            Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

            favicon

            The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

            https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

            Link Preview Image
            The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

            Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

            favicon

            Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

            Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
            https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

            Link Preview Image
            A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

            The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

            favicon

            Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

            Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

            favicon

            Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

            Link Preview Image
            The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

            Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

            favicon

            Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

            Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

            favicon

            Truthout (truthout.org)

            Link Preview Image
            Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

            Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

            favicon

            Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

            Link Preview Image
            Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

            Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

            favicon

            the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

            forbes.com

            favicon

            (www.forbes.com)

            Link Preview Image
            E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

            The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

            favicon

            (subscriber.politicopro.com)

            forbes.com

            favicon

            (www.forbes.com)

            Link Preview Image
            ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

            Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

            favicon

            the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

            Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

              3/

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              Link Preview Image
              Project 2025: Affirmative action

              Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

              favicon

              The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

              https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

              Link Preview Image
              The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

              Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

              favicon

              Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

              Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
              https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

              Link Preview Image
              A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

              The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

              favicon

              Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

              Link Preview Image
              Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

              Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

              favicon

              Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

              Link Preview Image
              The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

              Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

              favicon

              Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

              Link Preview Image
              Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

              Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

              favicon

              Truthout (truthout.org)

              Link Preview Image
              Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

              Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

              favicon

              Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

              Link Preview Image
              Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

              Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

              favicon

              the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              Link Preview Image
              E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

              The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

              favicon

              (subscriber.politicopro.com)

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              Link Preview Image
              ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

              Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

              favicon

              the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

              Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
              Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
              Nicole Parsons
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              4/

              Link Preview Image
              The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

              Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

              favicon

              Progressive.org (progressive.org)

              Link Preview Image
              Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

              Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

              favicon

              SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

              Link Preview Image
              The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

              favicon

              Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

              Link Preview Image
              ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

              Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

              favicon

              the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

              Link Preview Image
              The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

              There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

              favicon

              Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

              https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

              Link Preview Image
              Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

              The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

              favicon

              HNN (www.hnn.us)

              The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
              https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

              https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

              Just a moment...

              favicon

              (kansasreflector.com)

              forbes.com

              favicon

              (www.forbes.com)

              Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                4/

                Link Preview Image
                The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

                Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

                favicon

                Progressive.org (progressive.org)

                Link Preview Image
                Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

                Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

                favicon

                SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

                Link Preview Image
                The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

                favicon

                Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

                Link Preview Image
                ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

                Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

                favicon

                the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                Link Preview Image
                The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

                There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

                favicon

                Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

                https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

                Link Preview Image
                Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

                The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

                favicon

                HNN (www.hnn.us)

                The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
                https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

                forbes.com

                favicon

                (www.forbes.com)

                https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

                https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

                Just a moment...

                favicon

                (kansasreflector.com)

                forbes.com

                favicon

                (www.forbes.com)

                Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
                Nicole Parsons
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                5/

                Link Preview Image
                Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really. - Legal Planet

                At Legal Planet, we often bemoan and gnash our teeth at the Unitary Executive Theory, which supposedly holds that because “the Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States,” Congress can not circumscribe the President’s removal authority or even his  ability to manage federal agencies in any way. But last week, … Continue reading "Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really."

                favicon

                Legal Planet (legal-planet.org)

                Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.

                https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/project-2025-billionaire-donor-heritage-foundation-donald-trump-jd-vance-charles-koch-peter-coors/

                People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
                https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/

                https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/

                Link Preview Image
                Climate science deniers at forefront of downplaying coronavirus pandemic

                Vocal influencers such as the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and the Heartland Institute are hitting back at a time when people’s trust in science is rising

                favicon

                the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

                Link Preview Image
                How Donald Trump Kingmaker-Billionaires Robert and Rebekah Mercer Have Poured Millions Into Climate Science Denial

                When it comes to climate science denial, some names come easily and deservingly to mind. There’s oil giant ExxonMobil — a company that contributed millions of dollars to organizations that told the public there was no risk from burning fossil fuels. There are the oil billionaire Koch brothers — Charles and David — and their ideological zeal against […]

                favicon

                DeSmog (www.desmog.com)

                Link Preview Image
                How to Cause a Dysfunctional Government

                On RFK, Jr., Trump v. Slaughter, and the serious flaw of the right’s unitary executive theory.

                favicon

                The Texas Observer (www.texasobserver.org)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Eric deRuiterR Eric deRuiter

                  @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

                  2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

                  2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

                  Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
                  Sean Fenian
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

                  Sean LynchS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                    Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
                    Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
                    Mania Emma
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @amydiehl #patriarchy

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘A ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘

                      @amydiehl For a nation that advertises itself as a bastion of democracy, Americans put a lot of effort into denying people their right to vote.
                      I prefer our system, where you get in trouble if you *don't* vote. It's inclusive.

                      Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
                      Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
                      Alex Rosenberg
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                        KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                        KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                        KanaMauna
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @amydiehl

                        For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.

                        BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                          SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                          https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                          Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                          Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                          Edelruth In The Wrong Timeline
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @amydiehl

                          This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                            Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                            Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                            Paul Healey
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                              SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                              https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                              Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                              Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                              Hannah Steenbock
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @amydiehl

                              Another way of skewing elections to the right.

                              Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.

                              This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.

                              But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                                MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                                MusiqueNow :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @amydiehl

                                🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨#ALERT

                                #votersuppression #USElections #TransAndNonBinaryrRightsAreHumanRights

                                #womansrights #ElectionStealing #SAVEAct

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                                  @amydiehl

                                  It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

                                  The fossil fuel industry.

                                  Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

                                  All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

                                  Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
                                  https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

                                  The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

                                  favicon

                                  Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

                                  The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

                                  favicon

                                  Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                                  Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

                                  1/

                                  LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  LeBonk
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @Npars01 @amydiehl Look how scared they get when half the population is 6% less in favor of their scam

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                    Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Corb_The_Lesser
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @amydiehl The headline should change "Could" to "Would" and editors need to remember that most people don't know what "disenfranchise" means.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                      jcrispimromaoJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jcrispimromaoJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jcrispimromao
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @amydiehl Trump will not stop rigging the election as he knows that if everything goes by the rules he will lose heavily! And still 9 months to go!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                        MR.eM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MR.eM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        MR.e
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @amydiehl
                                        I would like to also point out this lets them revoke passports for ANYONE they want prior to election. Just like they IMMEDIATELY did for trans people who had changed gender markers.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

                                          @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

                                          Sean LynchS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Sean LynchS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Sean Lynch
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @zakalwe @amydiehl @ridogi

                                          The only silver lining is that JD Vance does not have a current legal name that matches the name on his birth certificate.

                                          James Donald Bowman -->
                                          James David Hamel -->
                                          James David (J.D.) Vance -->
                                          JD Vance

                                          Why did JD feel the need to transition to his current identity? I'm not sure, but I do respect his right to transition to an identity that makes him feel like himself.

                                          Disappointed_Horse 🇺🇦D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post