Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 27 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

    2/

    ... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.

    Link Preview Image
    Republican against child marriage ban calls teens "ripe, fertile"

    Lawmaker Jess Edwards opposed a child marriage ban and described teens as being of a "ripe, fertile" age.

    favicon

    Newsweek (www.newsweek.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Why Are Some Republican Lawmakers Hellbent on Preserving Child Marriage?

    GOP lawmakers across the U.S. have opposed raising the marriage age, with some arguing child marriage bans would encourage abortion.

    favicon

    Rolling Stone (www.rollingstone.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Republicans Are Really Into This Whole Child Marriage Thing

    Since 2007, Jezebel has been the Internet's most treasured source for everything celebrities, sex, and politics...with teeth.

    favicon

    Jezebel (www.jezebel.com)

    They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.

    They fund efforts at male supremacy

    Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
    Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
    Nicole Parsons
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    3/

    forbes.com

    favicon

    (www.forbes.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Project 2025: Affirmative action

    Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

    favicon

    The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

    https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

    Link Preview Image
    The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

    Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

    favicon

    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

    Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
    https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

    Link Preview Image
    A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

    The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

    favicon

    Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

    Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

    favicon

    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

    Link Preview Image
    The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

    Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

    favicon

    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

    Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

    favicon

    Truthout (truthout.org)

    Link Preview Image
    Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

    Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

    favicon

    Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

    Link Preview Image
    Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

    Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

    favicon

    the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

    forbes.com

    favicon

    (www.forbes.com)

    Link Preview Image
    E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

    The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

    favicon

    (subscriber.politicopro.com)

    forbes.com

    favicon

    (www.forbes.com)

    Link Preview Image
    ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

    Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

    favicon

    the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

    Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

      3/

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      Link Preview Image
      Project 2025: Affirmative action

      Over the course of U.S. history, Americans have attempted to level the playing field (e.g. Civil War, women's suffrage, civil rights movement). According to Project 2025, these changes begat “woke diversificrats” who believe the federal government can produce equality. It advocates “states’ rights” — the path of Southerners who championed slavery.

      favicon

      The Fulcrum (thefulcrum.us)

      https://msmagazine.com/2024/09/09/misogynist-manifesto-project-2025-marriage-women-abortion-bible-divorce-men/

      Link Preview Image
      The Same Dark Money Groups That Helped Overturn Roe Are Also Behind Attacks on Abortion Pill

      Dark money groups are fighting to eliminate one of the easiest to access and safest forms of abortion in this country — abortion pills.

      favicon

      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

      Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
      https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-curse

      Link Preview Image
      A Koch-funded group is tapping star marketers for a $250 million push to 'reignite the American spirit'

      The Koch-funded Stand Together is supporting a new effort that's lined up top marketers to boost civic engagement around America's 250th birthday.

      favicon

      Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

      Link Preview Image
      Misogynist Manifesto: Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

      Misogynist Manifesto: Right-Wing Republican Blueprint Project 2025 Says Yes to ‘Biblically Based Marriages’ and No to Reproductive Rights

      favicon

      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

      Link Preview Image
      The Same Groups That Helped Overturn Roe and Attack Abortion Pills Are Also Lobbying Against the ERA

      Anti-abortion groups are fighting to overturn Roe v. Wade, attack medication abortion pills, and stop the Equal Rights Amendment.

      favicon

      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

      Link Preview Image
      Dark Money “Women’s Groups” Are Using Anti-Trans Scaremongering to Oppose the Equal Rights Amendment

      Anti-feminist women’s groups set on quashing the Equal Rights Amendment are stoking baseless fears about trans women.

      favicon

      Truthout (truthout.org)

      Link Preview Image
      Project 2025: The Right’s Dystopian Plan to Dismantle Civil Rights and What It Means for Women

      Project 2025: The right-wing Heritage Foundation plan on civil rights, abortion access, gender studies, woke, and what it means for women.

      favicon

      Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

      Link Preview Image
      Revealed: how top pop stars are used to ‘launder the reputation’ of Koch family

      Stand Together Music, part of rightwing billionaire Charles Koch’s advocacy network, collaborates with Pitbull, Machine Gun Kelly and others

      favicon

      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      Link Preview Image
      E&E News: Koch-backed group launches permitting push

      The Americans for Prosperity campaign joins a drive from other industry lobby groups.

      favicon

      (subscriber.politicopro.com)

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      Link Preview Image
      ‘Project 2025’: plan to dismantle US climate policy for next Republican president

      Rightwing groups penned a conservative wish list of proposals for the next conservative president to gut environmental protections

      favicon

      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

      Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
      Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
      Nicole Parsons
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      4/

      Link Preview Image
      The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

      Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

      favicon

      Progressive.org (progressive.org)

      Link Preview Image
      Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

      Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

      favicon

      SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

      Link Preview Image
      The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

      favicon

      Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

      Link Preview Image
      ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

      Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

      favicon

      the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

      Link Preview Image
      The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

      There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

      favicon

      Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

      https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

      Link Preview Image
      Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

      The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

      favicon

      HNN (www.hnn.us)

      The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
      https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (kansasreflector.com)

      forbes.com

      favicon

      (www.forbes.com)

      Nicole ParsonsN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

        4/

        Link Preview Image
        The Billionaire Kingmaker (Still) Dividing the Nation

        Despite a rebrand, Charles Koch won’t stop until U.S. democracy is dead.

        favicon

        Progressive.org (progressive.org)

        Link Preview Image
        Morrison v. Olson and the triumph of the unitary executive theory

        Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean for the law, for lawyers and lower courts, and for people’s lives. […]

        favicon

        SCOTUSblog (www.scotusblog.com)

        Link Preview Image
        The Koch Government: These 44 Trump Officials Have Close Ties to Right-Wing Billionaire Brothers - Public Citizen

        favicon

        Public Citizen (www.citizen.org)

        Link Preview Image
        ‘Get the right cases to the supreme court’: inside Charles Koch’s network

        Billionaire’s web of rightwing groups works to bring cases to court that could undermine core functionings of the US government

        favicon

        the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

        Link Preview Image
        The dangerous legal theory behind Trump’s power grabs

        There was no “unitary executive” until some dudes made the idea up to save Nixon.

        favicon

        Mother Jones (www.motherjones.com)

        https://theconversation.com/dick-cheneys-expansive-vision-of-presidential-power-lives-on-in-trumps-agenda-269071https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/01/30/trump-firing-executive-branch-supreme-court/

        Link Preview Image
        Despite Aggressive Rebrand, Charles Koch is Still Fighting Against Democracy

        The media have latched on to Charles Koch's recent expressions of regret over partisanship. But this is a rebranding, not a redirection. 

        favicon

        HNN (www.hnn.us)

        The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
        https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loophole

        forbes.com

        favicon

        (www.forbes.com)

        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html

        https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks

        Just a moment...

        favicon

        (kansasreflector.com)

        forbes.com

        favicon

        (www.forbes.com)

        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
        Nicole ParsonsN This user is from outside of this forum
        Nicole Parsons
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        5/

        Link Preview Image
        Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really. - Legal Planet

        At Legal Planet, we often bemoan and gnash our teeth at the Unitary Executive Theory, which supposedly holds that because “the Executive Power shall be vested in the President of the United States,” Congress can not circumscribe the President’s removal authority or even his  ability to manage federal agencies in any way. But last week, … Continue reading "Does the Unitary Executive Theory Exist? Not really."

        favicon

        Legal Planet (legal-planet.org)

        Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.

        https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/project-2025-billionaire-donor-heritage-foundation-donald-trump-jd-vance-charles-koch-peter-coors/

        People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
        https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/

        https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/

        Link Preview Image
        Climate science deniers at forefront of downplaying coronavirus pandemic

        Vocal influencers such as the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and the Heartland Institute are hitting back at a time when people’s trust in science is rising

        favicon

        the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)

        Link Preview Image
        How Donald Trump Kingmaker-Billionaires Robert and Rebekah Mercer Have Poured Millions Into Climate Science Denial

        When it comes to climate science denial, some names come easily and deservingly to mind. There’s oil giant ExxonMobil — a company that contributed millions of dollars to organizations that told the public there was no risk from burning fossil fuels. There are the oil billionaire Koch brothers — Charles and David — and their ideological zeal against […]

        favicon

        DeSmog (www.desmog.com)

        Link Preview Image
        How to Cause a Dysfunctional Government

        On RFK, Jr., Trump v. Slaughter, and the serious flaw of the right’s unitary executive theory.

        favicon

        The Texas Observer (www.texasobserver.org)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Eric deRuiterR Eric deRuiter

          @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

          2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

          2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

          Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
          Sean FenianZ This user is from outside of this forum
          Sean Fenian
          wrote last edited by
          #15

          @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

          Sean LynchS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

            Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
            Mania EmmaE This user is from outside of this forum
            Mania Emma
            wrote last edited by
            #16

            @amydiehl #patriarchy

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘A ChookMother 🇦🇺🦘

              @amydiehl For a nation that advertises itself as a bastion of democracy, Americans put a lot of effort into denying people their right to vote.
              I prefer our system, where you get in trouble if you *don't* vote. It's inclusive.

              Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
              Alex RosenbergA This user is from outside of this forum
              Alex Rosenberg
              wrote last edited by
              #17

              @anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                KanaMaunaK This user is from outside of this forum
                KanaMauna
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                @amydiehl

                For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.

                BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                  SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                  https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                  Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                  Edelruth In The Wrong TimelineE This user is from outside of this forum
                  Edelruth In The Wrong Timeline
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @amydiehl

                  This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                    Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Paul HealeyD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Paul Healey
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    @amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                      SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                      https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                      Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                      Hannah SteenbockF This user is from outside of this forum
                      Hannah Steenbock
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      @amydiehl

                      Another way of skewing elections to the right.

                      Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.

                      This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.

                      But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                        SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                        https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                        MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                        MusiqueNow   :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:M This user is from outside of this forum
                        MusiqueNow :pride: ✡️ 🇵🇸 :anarchismhebrew:
                        wrote last edited by
                        #22

                        @amydiehl

                        🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨#ALERT

                        #votersuppression #USElections #TransAndNonBinaryrRightsAreHumanRights

                        #womansrights #ElectionStealing #SAVEAct

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Nicole ParsonsN Nicole Parsons

                          @amydiehl

                          It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.

                          The fossil fuel industry.

                          Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.

                          All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.

                          Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
                          https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.html

                          Link Preview Image
                          Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch Brothers Are Funding the Anti-Choice Agenda

                          The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. But three years ago, a Supreme Court case, the U.S. Census, and anti-Obama backlash set the course for the arsonists who trained their flame-throwers on women's fundamental freedoms.

                          favicon

                          Rewire News Group (rewirenewsgroup.com)

                          Link Preview Image
                          Mothers Want Federally Funded Childcare. Why Are These Koch-Funded Women Opposing It?

                          The right-wing, anti-feminist, Koch-funded “Independent Women’s Forum” has been at the forefront of assaults on federally funded childcare.

                          favicon

                          Ms. Magazine (msmagazine.com)

                          Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...

                          1/

                          LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                          LeBonkL This user is from outside of this forum
                          LeBonk
                          wrote last edited by
                          #23

                          @Npars01 @amydiehl Look how scared they get when half the population is 6% less in favor of their scam

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                            SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                            https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                            Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Corb_The_LesserC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Corb_The_Lesser
                            wrote last edited by
                            #24

                            @amydiehl The headline should change "Could" to "Would" and editors need to remember that most people don't know what "disenfranchise" means.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                              SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                              https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                              jcrispimromaoJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jcrispimromaoJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jcrispimromao
                              wrote last edited by
                              #25

                              @amydiehl Trump will not stop rigging the election as he knows that if everything goes by the rules he will lose heavily! And still 9 months to go!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                MR.eM This user is from outside of this forum
                                MR.eM This user is from outside of this forum
                                MR.e
                                wrote last edited by
                                #26

                                @amydiehl
                                I would like to also point out this lets them revoke passports for ANYONE they want prior to election. Just like they IMMEDIATELY did for trans people who had changed gender markers.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

                                  @ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.

                                  Sean LynchS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Sean LynchS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Sean Lynch
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #27

                                  @zakalwe @amydiehl @ridogi

                                  The only silver lining is that JD Vance does not have a current legal name that matches the name on his birth certificate.

                                  James Donald Bowman -->
                                  James David Hamel -->
                                  James David (J.D.) Vance -->
                                  JD Vance

                                  Why did JD feel the need to transition to his current identity? I'm not sure, but I do respect his right to transition to an identity that makes him feel like himself.

                                  Disappointed_Horse 🇺🇦D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Amy Diehl, Ph.D.A Amy Diehl, Ph.D.

                                    SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
                                    https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/

                                    RozzychanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    RozzychanR This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Rozzychan
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #28

                                    @amydiehl

                                    I also heard an unconfirmed rumor that some people's passport records have been cancelled. Only saw it on you tube, but it is distressing if true.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Eric deRuiterR Eric deRuiter

                                      @zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.

                                      2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/

                                      2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/

                                      JonathanJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      JonathanJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Jonathan
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #29

                                      @ridogi yup

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Sean LynchS Sean Lynch

                                        @zakalwe @amydiehl @ridogi

                                        The only silver lining is that JD Vance does not have a current legal name that matches the name on his birth certificate.

                                        James Donald Bowman -->
                                        James David Hamel -->
                                        James David (J.D.) Vance -->
                                        JD Vance

                                        Why did JD feel the need to transition to his current identity? I'm not sure, but I do respect his right to transition to an identity that makes him feel like himself.

                                        Disappointed_Horse 🇺🇦D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Disappointed_Horse 🇺🇦D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Disappointed_Horse 🇺🇦
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #30

                                        @SeanPLynch @zakalwe @amydiehl @ridogi In the south—maybe in other parts of the country too; I don't know—there's a general assumption that any man who goes by "JD" is actually named after Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

                                          @amydiehl@mstdn.social That could backfire on them. I saw it asserted a day or two ago that without white women voting disproportionately conservative, no conservative would have won election in the last century.

                                          I don't know how
                                          true the assertion is.

                                          [UPDATE (see below): Looks like it's not.]

                                          Lucy BL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Lucy BL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Lucy B
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #31

                                          @zakalwe

                                          I believe what was meant by that is that white women are a crucial pivot point. It’s assumed most white men will vote Republican. White women shift more, like independents, and have more effect on elections. But most low educated white women also vote Republican, and so in every presidential election, the GOP wins the white vote overall.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post