Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Runes

Runes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
66 Posts 46 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
    This post did not contain any content.
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    goretantath@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    Ok love this one XD

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
    • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
      This post did not contain any content.
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      someguy3@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

      T T 2 Replies Last reply
      11
      • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
        This post did not contain any content.
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        gladaed@feddit.org
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        Nothing would happen it is so incredibly dangerous for its short half life time and reasonable amount of energy that’s freed by its decay.

        Its just fucking lead, bro.(Well, nickel)

        1 Reply Last reply
        7
        • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
          This post did not contain any content.
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          Not a newt
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

          But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

          I A D 3 Replies Last reply
          134
          • S someguy3@lemmy.world

            I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            tyler@programming.dev
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            If the rod is glowing, probably a fuckton.

            1 Reply Last reply
            19
            • L Not a newt

              Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

              But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

              I This user is from outside of this forum
              I This user is from outside of this forum
              iamthetot@sh.itjust.works
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              If it’s actively glowing blue, I don’t think it’s safe to handle.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              61
              • S someguy3@lemmy.world

                I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

                T This user is from outside of this forum
                T This user is from outside of this forum
                StinkyFingerItchyBum
                wrote last edited by thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca
                #8

                I asked Chat GPT:

                Approximate unshielded dose rates:

                At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

                At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

                At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

                At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

                At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

                (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

                These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

                Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                GloomyG T L 3 Replies Last reply
                20
                • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                  grue@lemmy.world
                  wrote last edited by grue@lemmy.world
                  #9

                  I assume “danger” and “drop & run” would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation (or cobalt, or how large a ‘curie’ is)?

                  K B despoticruinD 3 Replies Last reply
                  26
                  • L Not a newt

                    Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

                    But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    A This user is from outside of this forum
                    AwesomeLowlander
                    wrote last edited by awesomelowlander@sh.itjust.works
                    #10

                    Somebody casted Repair on the rod

                    heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
                    38
                    • L Not a newt

                      Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

                      But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      damage@feddit.it
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      What if it was stored in a fridge

                      Brave Little Hitachi WandG T 2 Replies Last reply
                      20
                      • G grue@lemmy.world

                        I assume “danger” and “drop & run” would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation (or cobalt, or how large a ‘curie’ is)?

                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        khanzarate@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        I’d personally translate it to the closest word they have.

                        If I decided they didn’t have a word that was directly equivalent, in this case I’d use the closest word, “light-emitting”.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        12
                        • T StinkyFingerItchyBum

                          I asked Chat GPT:

                          Approximate unshielded dose rates:

                          At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

                          At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

                          At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

                          At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

                          At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

                          (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

                          These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

                          Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                          GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                          Gloomy
                          wrote last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                          #13

                          Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                          I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said “nana” and then with emphasis “nana” once more.

                          The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer.

                          Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I’ll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          39
                          • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            V This user is from outside of this forum
                            vithigar@lemmy.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            Isn’t the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?

                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            11
                            • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              SundrayS This user is from outside of this forum
                              SundrayS This user is from outside of this forum
                              Sundray
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              Hopefully there’s one of these around: Material Safety Data Sheet for cobalt 60.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              6
                              • V vithigar@lemmy.ca

                                Isn’t the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?

                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                traceur201
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                It’s technically slightly visible in air; if actually visible at all in air it means the level of radiation is ludicrously deadly

                                starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS 1 Reply Last reply
                                25
                                • GloomyG Gloomy

                                  Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                                  I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said “nana” and then with emphasis “nana” once more.

                                  The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer.

                                  Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I’ll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.

                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                                  wrote last edited by mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                                  #17

                                  She’s absolutely right!

                                  NANA, you dopes!

                                  Roll for speed

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  16
                                  • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    delta_v@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by delta_v@lemmy.world
                                    #18

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Metallurgy

                                    favicon

                                    xkcd (xkcd.com)

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    152
                                    • I iamthetot@sh.itjust.works

                                      If it’s actively glowing blue, I don’t think it’s safe to handle.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      stupidcasey@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      If it’s actively glowing blue it means it’s under water producing Cherenkov radiation and the water should shield you from the alpha particles.

                                      A F 2 Replies Last reply
                                      51
                                      • T StinkyFingerItchyBum

                                        I asked Chat GPT:

                                        Approximate unshielded dose rates:

                                        At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

                                        At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

                                        At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

                                        At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

                                        At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

                                        (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

                                        These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

                                        Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tburkhol@lemmy.world
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        You’re not getting downvoted. ChatGPT is getting downvoted, and you just happened to be in the way.

                                        These guys, the 2nd google link after AI, say that a 3540 Ci/130 TBq source would be around 500 Sv/h at 30 cm. Even Wikipedia says 45 Sv/h at 1m

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                                        33
                                        • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          allnewtypeface@leminal.space
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          That’s what you get for not casting it on the “This is not a place of honour” sign near the jagged black obelisks after encountering the colony of glowing cats

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          46

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post