Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Runes

Runes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
65 Posts 46 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
    This post did not contain any content.
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    someguy3@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

    T T 2 Replies Last reply
    11
    • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
      This post did not contain any content.
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      gladaed@feddit.org
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      Nothing would happen it is so incredibly dangerous for its short half life time and reasonable amount of energy that’s freed by its decay.

      Its just fucking lead, bro.(Well, nickel)

      1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
        This post did not contain any content.
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        Not a newt
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

        But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

        I A D 3 Replies Last reply
        134
        • S someguy3@lemmy.world

          I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          tyler@programming.dev
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          If the rod is glowing, probably a fuckton.

          1 Reply Last reply
          19
          • L Not a newt

            Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

            But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

            I This user is from outside of this forum
            I This user is from outside of this forum
            iamthetot@sh.itjust.works
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            If it’s actively glowing blue, I don’t think it’s safe to handle.

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            61
            • S someguy3@lemmy.world

              I wonder what the damage would be holding it for 15 seconds.

              T This user is from outside of this forum
              T This user is from outside of this forum
              StinkyFingerItchyBum
              wrote last edited by thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca
              #8

              I asked Chat GPT:

              Approximate unshielded dose rates:

              At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

              At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

              At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

              At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

              At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

              (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

              These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

              Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

              GloomyG T L 3 Replies Last reply
              20
              • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                This post did not contain any content.
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                G This user is from outside of this forum
                grue@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by grue@lemmy.world
                #9

                I assume “danger” and “drop & run” would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation (or cobalt, or how large a ‘curie’ is)?

                K B despoticruinD 3 Replies Last reply
                26
                • L Not a newt

                  Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

                  But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  AwesomeLowlander
                  wrote last edited by awesomelowlander@sh.itjust.works
                  #10

                  Somebody casted Repair on the rod

                  heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
                  38
                  • L Not a newt

                    Cobalt 60 has a half life of 5.27 years. Assuming that a language lost to time is at least 500 years old, the rod should be fairly safe to handle. Heck, even after only 100 years less than 0.01% of the original amount of radioactive material would be left.

                    But that aside - One of the items that can be found in the video game series Avernum is Uranium bars, which give you a nice unhealthy glow 🙂

                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                    damage@feddit.it
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    What if it was stored in a fridge

                    Brave Little Hitachi WandG T 2 Replies Last reply
                    20
                    • G grue@lemmy.world

                      I assume “danger” and “drop & run” would be straightforward enough, but does casting comprehend languages cause the wizard to understand the concept of radiation (or cobalt, or how large a ‘curie’ is)?

                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      khanzarate@lemmy.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      I’d personally translate it to the closest word they have.

                      If I decided they didn’t have a word that was directly equivalent, in this case I’d use the closest word, “light-emitting”.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      12
                      • T StinkyFingerItchyBum

                        I asked Chat GPT:

                        Approximate unshielded dose rates:

                        At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

                        At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

                        At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

                        At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

                        At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

                        (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

                        These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

                        Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        GloomyG This user is from outside of this forum
                        Gloomy
                        wrote last edited by gloomy@mander.xyz
                        #13

                        Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                        I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said “nana” and then with emphasis “nana” once more.

                        The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer.

                        Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I’ll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.

                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                        39
                        • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                          vithigar@lemmy.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          Isn’t the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?

                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                          11
                          • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            SundrayS This user is from outside of this forum
                            SundrayS This user is from outside of this forum
                            Sundray
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            Hopefully there’s one of these around: Material Safety Data Sheet for cobalt 60.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            6
                            • V vithigar@lemmy.ca

                              Isn’t the blue glow only present under water (or other transparent medium with a similarly high index of refraction)?

                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              T This user is from outside of this forum
                              traceur201
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              It’s technically slightly visible in air; if actually visible at all in air it means the level of radiation is ludicrously deadly

                              starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS 1 Reply Last reply
                              25
                              • GloomyG Gloomy

                                Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                                I asked my toddler about the radiation and she said “nana” and then with emphasis “nana” once more.

                                The downvotes are because our two methods of finding an answer are roughly equally likely to returning a reliable answer.

                                Mine is slightly better for the climate, maybe. That will likely change as she grows up and uses up more resources. I’ll ask her to do the math on that one later, she is busy eating a book right now.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote last edited by mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                                #17

                                She’s absolutely right!

                                NANA, you dopes!

                                Roll for speed

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                16
                                • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                                  D This user is from outside of this forum
                                  delta_v@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by delta_v@lemmy.world
                                  #18

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Metallurgy

                                  favicon

                                  xkcd (xkcd.com)

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  150
                                  • I iamthetot@sh.itjust.works

                                    If it’s actively glowing blue, I don’t think it’s safe to handle.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    stupidcasey@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    If it’s actively glowing blue it means it’s under water producing Cherenkov radiation and the water should shield you from the alpha particles.

                                    A F 2 Replies Last reply
                                    51
                                    • T StinkyFingerItchyBum

                                      I asked Chat GPT:

                                      Approximate unshielded dose rates:

                                      At 1 m: ≈ 5.2×10^4 Sv/h (≈51,800 Sv/h) — fatal essentially instantaneously (seconds or less).

                                      At 3 m: ≈ 5.8×10^3 Sv/h — fatal within seconds.

                                      At 10 m: ≈ 5.18×10^2 Sv/h — fatal within tens of seconds.

                                      At 30 m: ≈ 5.8×10^1 Sv/h — severe, life‑threatening in minutes.

                                      At 100 m: ≈ 5.2 Sv/h — dangerous; a few hours would produce fatal/serious acute radiation syndrome.

                                      (For perspective: an acute whole‑body dose of ~4–5 Sv often causes death without intensive medical care; 1 Sv already causes significant radiation sickness.)

                                      These are conservative, point‑source, unshielded estimates for whole‑body dose from the gammas. Being closer, or in contact, or staying in the field increases dose proportionally.

                                      Back to me again. I’m sorry my radioactive physics game is weak and I had to speculatively look it up. That’s a lot of downvotes, yet no one decided to share the math themselves.

                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tburkhol@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      You’re not getting downvoted. ChatGPT is getting downvoted, and you just happened to be in the way.

                                      These guys, the 2nd google link after AI, say that a 3540 Ci/130 TBq source would be around 500 Sv/h at 30 cm. Even Wikipedia says 45 Sv/h at 1m

                                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                                      32
                                      • Track_ShovelT Track_Shovel
                                        This post did not contain any content.
                                        allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        allnewtypeface@leminal.spaceA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        allnewtypeface@leminal.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        That’s what you get for not casting it on the “This is not a place of honour” sign near the jagged black obelisks after encountering the colony of glowing cats

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        46
                                        • A AwesomeLowlander

                                          Somebody casted Repair on the rod

                                          heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #22

                                          i cast mending on the pile of lead, giving me a solid cubic foot of weapons grade plutonium.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          42

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post