The Daggerheart license is disappointing.
-
The Daggerheart license is disappointing. It’s not a true Ulysses pact. It does not protect us (or them) from their future selves (or, say, Amazon if they acquire DP / CR).
Current work seems protected but future work is always iffy. Also, making creators learn bespoke licenses is a pain. Use CC!
-
The Daggerheart license is disappointing. It’s not a true Ulysses pact. It does not protect us (or them) from their future selves (or, say, Amazon if they acquire DP / CR).
Current work seems protected but future work is always iffy. Also, making creators learn bespoke licenses is a pain. Use CC!
@slyflourish I would be curious to hear your take on why so many ttrpg creators seem to avoid CC or other copyleft style licenses? Based on comments I have seen, there are well-regarded creators that don't even understand those licenses, is it an education thing?
People got so upset over language in the OGL but hardly blink an eye at similar language (as far as I can tell) in games like Daggerheart or Draw Steel.
-
@slyflourish I would be curious to hear your take on why so many ttrpg creators seem to avoid CC or other copyleft style licenses? Based on comments I have seen, there are well-regarded creators that don't even understand those licenses, is it an education thing?
People got so upset over language in the OGL but hardly blink an eye at similar language (as far as I can tell) in games like Daggerheart or Draw Steel.
@blacsmit I think in the case of independent publishers, they’ve talked to conservative lawyers who don’t think they should give anything away at all.
