Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Constitutional right to a wild garden with weeds and bees to be tested in Ontario court

Constitutional right to a wild garden with weeds and bees to be tested in Ontario court

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
56 Posts 35 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S sreudianflip@sh.itjust.works

    It’s also, in the simplest way, incompetent.

    All those weeds provide some ecological service in some way. If you look at my yard and note it’s covered in tall straggly white flowers, you could say weedy, and be right. I would clarify that wild carrots are helping convert our heavy clay soil into good tilth, and supporting a massive number of pollinators and pest predators.

    And why would we put up with yellow dock going to seed everywhere? It’s the most nutritious chicken fodder, and it also gives tilth to heavy clay.

    Don’t get me started about dandelion!!

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    there is even non-native plants that naturalized, but not invasive.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca

      Ragweed can burn in hell.

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      kudzu, ivy, and any vine plants. although kudzu is now being combatted with the weevil.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • L lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        Unfortunately many tax payers will support it, because non-standard property appearance drags down property values. Or people just get their panties twisted by stuff. Some of my city’s aldermen are trying to make it illegal to grow corn (technically “vegetable gardens over six feet tall”) in city limits because they have gotten so many complaints from neighbors. Having a food plant visible near a residence? The horror!

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        mpatch@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        Corn is a garbage crop to grow at home. The height thing is kina dumb, because they probably wouldn’t bat an eye about sunflowers and roses up on a trellis. But corn basically robs all the nutrients in the gardens soil incredibly fast, starving the other crops. Also as produce corn is the cheapest and most abundant staple and to grow a some what substantial amount you gota give up a significant portion of your garden.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • M mpatch@lemmy.world

          Corn is a garbage crop to grow at home. The height thing is kina dumb, because they probably wouldn’t bat an eye about sunflowers and roses up on a trellis. But corn basically robs all the nutrients in the gardens soil incredibly fast, starving the other crops. Also as produce corn is the cheapest and most abundant staple and to grow a some what substantial amount you gota give up a significant portion of your garden.

          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          There is a house a few blocks from me that, due to the shape of their property, has no backyard, it’s all front. They have maybe fifteen young chestnut trees (bloomed for the first time this spring, but don’t seem to have set), hazelnut bushes between all the trees, and maybe a ten foot by six foot bed of corn. I think other stuff, too, but those are the eye catching things.

          I have no idea what they think they are going to do with all those nuts once the trees and bushes start producing, or whether they are growing some interesting variety of corn or just find it entertaining to grow a supermarket variety themselves, but it’s their property and I feel like they should be able to do what they want (garbage crops included) without the city getting up in their business.

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • Binzy_BoiB Binzy_Boi

            I think the term is fine if you approach it from an “invasive species” mindset rather than an “undesirable” mindset.

            I don’t know if it was intentionally done by my teachers, but that’s the impression I always got about the term since it was usually brought up in the context of introduced species of plants causing harm to native species. Stuff like dandelions and such.

            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            deathsembrace@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            This is the real problem. Where the fuck did you find a plant only native in South America?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Binzy_BoiB Binzy_Boi

              I think the term is fine if you approach it from an “invasive species” mindset rather than an “undesirable” mindset.

              I don’t know if it was intentionally done by my teachers, but that’s the impression I always got about the term since it was usually brought up in the context of introduced species of plants causing harm to native species. Stuff like dandelions and such.

              W This user is from outside of this forum
              W This user is from outside of this forum
              wolf@lemmy.today
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              I understand what you are saying, but growing up the term ‘weed’ was always used in the ‘undesirable plants’ sense and the term ‘invasive species’ is more accurate when you are discussing them specifically. When I first started gardening, the guy who trained me defined weeds as ‘any plant the client doesn’t want growing on their property’.

              Stuff like dandelions and such.

              Dandelions are a complex topic. While some consider them “Noxious Weeds”, other people recognize their value as important sources of food for insects, they attract pollinators, and they also release ethylene which is a gas that encourages fruit setting and fruit ripening, so they are sometimes grown as ‘companion plants’.

              Dandelions are only weeds if you don’t want them there, like any other ‘weed’.

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • A alexlost@lemmy.world

                HOAs in general and all the bs that goes with it like this “law” are a thing of the past and don’t reflect the current world we live in. Pristine manicured yards have caused problems across the globe for the underlying systems that keep the earth healthy and vibrant. We need to relearn how to live in the environments we find ourselves in, not cater them to our own self deluding fantasies of perfection.

                W This user is from outside of this forum
                W This user is from outside of this forum
                wolf@lemmy.today
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                HOAs are the invasive species

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • B bussygyatt@feddit.org

                  ignoring the obvious fact that you’re effectively declaring entire clades of sentient animals to be basically biological waste because i know im going to make exactly zero headway with a human supremacist in this comment; if the primary consideration were pests, wouldn’t stones or pavement be a more ideal solution than grass with all the maintenance and upkeep that requires being baked into the law?

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  auli@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  What the fuck. Really human supremist now.

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A auli@lemmy.ca

                    What the fuck. Really human supremist now.

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    bussygyatt@feddit.org
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    be proud. get it on a t-shirt. let the whole world know. start a movement. keep killing animals in your basement. die an ironic death.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • A alexlost@lemmy.world

                      HOAs in general and all the bs that goes with it like this “law” are a thing of the past and don’t reflect the current world we live in. Pristine manicured yards have caused problems across the globe for the underlying systems that keep the earth healthy and vibrant. We need to relearn how to live in the environments we find ourselves in, not cater them to our own self deluding fantasies of perfection.

                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      D This user is from outside of this forum
                      derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      HOAs aren’t really a thing in Canada, she is being taken to court by the city.

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • W wolf@lemmy.today

                        HOAs are the invasive species

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        It sounds like they are, but thankfully they haven’t taken root in Canada.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • streetfestival@lemmy.caS streetfestival@lemmy.ca

                          A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

                          Barnes is challenging the case on constitutional grounds, arguing her right to freedom of expression through gardening is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

                          She says her garden supports pollinators, biodiversity and wildlife, reflecting her environmental and spiritual beliefs. She appeared for a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday and is scheduled for a two-day trial in November, according to her lawyer, Vilko Zbogar.

                          Zbogar says the case is about more than the fine. “Courts have recognized since at least 1996 that freedom of expression under the Charter protects natural gardens as expressions of profound environmental values,” he said. “For Karen, it’s also a spiritual exercise — tied to her creed and beliefs. This falls under Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter: freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.”

                          Experts say naturalized gardens and meadows can attract far more pollinators than regularly mown lawns, while also using less water and improving soil health.

                          Link Preview Image
                          Constitutional right to a wild garden with weeds and bees to be tested in Ontario court

                          A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

                          favicon

                          Canada's National Observer (www.nationalobserver.com)

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          Only question I would have is which path is she stood on in that picture? If that is a public footpath then there might be an argument that she should cut the edge back a little. Otherwise: The bees are happy, leave her alone.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.world

                            i use wolf spiders for house insect control. currently Gary is on duty

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            tribblehappy@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            That’s funny, my kids named the basement spider “Terry” and they take pictures whenever he shows up.

                            heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • T tribblehappy@lemmy.ca

                              That’s funny, my kids named the basement spider “Terry” and they take pictures whenever he shows up.

                              heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                              heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                              heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              i fucking hate ants (hyperope, can’t see them til they bite my ass), and Gary does a good job of patrolling the spots they enter and eating them. he’s a cool dude.

                              peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.world

                                i fucking hate ants (hyperope, can’t see them til they bite my ass), and Gary does a good job of patrolling the spots they enter and eating them. he’s a cool dude.

                                peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP This user is from outside of this forum
                                peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP This user is from outside of this forum
                                peppycito@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                House centipedes eat ants.

                                heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • peppycito@sh.itjust.worksP peppycito@sh.itjust.works

                                  House centipedes eat ants.

                                  heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  they also eat Gary and he’s pretty cool

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • streetfestival@lemmy.caS streetfestival@lemmy.ca

                                    A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

                                    Barnes is challenging the case on constitutional grounds, arguing her right to freedom of expression through gardening is protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

                                    She says her garden supports pollinators, biodiversity and wildlife, reflecting her environmental and spiritual beliefs. She appeared for a pre-trial hearing on Wednesday and is scheduled for a two-day trial in November, according to her lawyer, Vilko Zbogar.

                                    Zbogar says the case is about more than the fine. “Courts have recognized since at least 1996 that freedom of expression under the Charter protects natural gardens as expressions of profound environmental values,” he said. “For Karen, it’s also a spiritual exercise — tied to her creed and beliefs. This falls under Sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter: freedom of conscience and religion and freedom of expression.”

                                    Experts say naturalized gardens and meadows can attract far more pollinators than regularly mown lawns, while also using less water and improving soil health.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Constitutional right to a wild garden with weeds and bees to be tested in Ontario court

                                    A Burlington homeowner is fighting charges over her “naturalized garden” of native plants in her front and back yards. The city is taking Karen Barnes to Provincial Offences Court, seeking up to $400,000 in fines for violating a bylaw order to cut it down.

                                    favicon

                                    Canada's National Observer (www.nationalobserver.com)

                                    IninewCrowI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    IninewCrowI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    IninewCrow
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    Meanwhile … it’s OK for the government of Ontario to sell off protected environmental habitats to mow it all down, dig it up and put up a luxury condo for a private enterprise to make money off while destroying irreplaceable natural habitat (irreplaceable during our lifetime or within several hundred years that is)

                                    We should be encouraging people to plant and maintain wild habitat … not cutting everything down to turn it all into your person living room. It’s the outdoors that is shared with animals, not your personal property that looks like it has an ugly green throw rug. It’s a natural habitat and no matter what ideas, laws, regulations or rules you want to create or invent, nature will always take over and grow over it all, no matter how entitled you feel you are to the piece of property you call your own.

                                    I live in northern Ontario where it’s hard to grow things. But I’ve adapted and now I grow a wild hedge of Caragana bushes (although not native, they are about the only thing that grow this strong in the northern cold environment)

                                    I mowed down my ugly grass lawn to the dirt and planted clover and now my lawn is green all year long and I cut it only once or twice a year. Previously, I was cutting it every two weeks because of the tall overgrown grass and every month it would grow over with a huge bloom of dandelions, the lawn was literally yellow. As nice as the dandelions are, they only last about two weeks, then turn into the puff balls that leave behind an ugly lawn with headless flowers and tall grass. Clover grows low to the ground and never gets high, plus its a nitrogen fixer which means it actually feeds the lawn over time on its own, growing more clover with deeper roots making them all stronger.

                                    This is also the second year I’ve grown a wild flower garden and this August was the first major bloom I’ve had. Beautiful flowers that are just starting to die off now. I’ll be planting more this fall and hoping for more in years to come.

                                    Honestly, the lawn used to look like an abandoned lot before with overgrown grass and dandelion crops. Now it actually has colour, I don’t have to do much to take care of it and it actually has life, colour and interest to it all. And I don’t do a thing other than to let everything grow on their own.

                                    Compare that to my next door neighbour who keeps a manicured lawn. His lawn is like a carpet with grass 3" tall evenly cut across his small plot. He contracts lawn specialists to cut, trim, aerate, thatch and fertilize his lawn at least four times a year. He spot fertilizes any foreign flower, dandelion or plant that appears anywhere. I’m sure it costs him a fortune to maintain it all … compared to mine where I spent some money and work up front but don’t spend much on maintenance annually, other than to mow the lawn once or twice a year.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • D derisionconsulting@lemmy.ca

                                      HOAs aren’t really a thing in Canada, she is being taken to court by the city.

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      alexlost@lemmy.world
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #56

                                      I am aware, I was alluding to the whole idea of it, which the city has taken the role of in this case. I believe it is ridiculous beyond maintaining house size for sanity sake. I get there is building code for things, why is there garden code? Stay out of my yard!!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post