PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
-
It also stops claude from making issues or PRs on any of your repos.
I consider this a bonus.
@noboilerplate @robb too bad we can’t do Copilot and Codex’s usernames too…
-
PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
Now, the moment you look at a repo, you can immediately adjust your expectations.
You may do so here: https://github.com/settings/blocked_users
@noboilerplate I wish we could have obvious labels for all this stuff people are passing off as their own. Pretty soon, we're going to start using the same garbage in new garbage.
-
PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
Now, the moment you look at a repo, you can immediately adjust your expectations.
You may do so here: https://github.com/settings/blocked_users
@noboilerplate this is a great tip thanks to everyone who boosted it
-
@alice @noboilerplate
Copilot reportedly can appear in participant list for PRs despite never partucipating in which may cause false alarms with that approach.@tiredbun @alice @noboilerplate Worse than that: they appear to only do that if the viewer is logged out last I checked, so the maintainer can't easily see that GitHub is disparaging them by claiming copilot's involvement. (I could see that working out rather poorly for them in certain countries with strong anti-defamation laws if the maintainer is "particularly vocal" about not using it)
-
It also stops claude from making issues or PRs on any of your repos.
I consider this a bonus.
@noboilerplate THIS. IS. AWESOME. Great work bringing this to light.
-
It also stops claude from making issues or PRs on any of your repos.
I consider this a bonus.
@noboilerplate
That's an absolute win -
PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
Now, the moment you look at a repo, you can immediately adjust your expectations.
You may do so here: https://github.com/settings/blocked_users
That's a great trick. Thank you.
-
PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
Now, the moment you look at a repo, you can immediately adjust your expectations.
You may do so here: https://github.com/settings/blocked_users
@noboilerplate@namtao.com You guys have a Github account?
-
@noboilerplate@namtao.com You guys have a Github account?
@SuperDicq *sigh* for now
-
@SuperDicq *sigh* for now
@noboilerplate@namtao.com It's pretty easy to move to something better like Codeberg. Git is a free and distributed version management system after all. All you have to do is "git push" to a new repo and your entire history is there.
-
It also stops claude from making issues or PRs on any of your repos.
I consider this a bonus.
@noboilerplate Funny, but the end result is that you're still using github. -
PSA: If you block the `claude` user on GitHub, you'll get a warning every time you view a repo with that user in its commit history.
Now, the moment you look at a repo, you can immediately adjust your expectations.
You may do so here: https://github.com/settings/blocked_users
@noboilerplate this only "protects" you against people who are lazy enough to even ask claude to commit for them, most people are not using that, so you can still have something fully vibecoded with claude and no signs of this user in the repo
️ -
J Jürgen Hubert shared this topic
