Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Apparently Canadians are notorius cheaters in the sport of Curling

Apparently Canadians are notorius cheaters in the sport of Curling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
157 Posts 90 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

    Having curled myself, I can assure you it does not…and if it did make a difference, it would almost certainly be negative, since you’re giving up any semblance of control that you had on the actual throw. There’s not going to be some “precision poke” that magically steers it where it needs to go. But don’t take my word for it.

    Does it make any difference?

    “No. The double-touching that I’ve seen has been incidental contact, and that’s fingers brushing or hand brushing on a 40-pound piece of granite,” said Eugene Hritzuk, a Canadian curler based in Saskatoon who has been involved in competitive curling and coaching for more than 60 years.

    “What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event? You need the palm on your hand against that stone to do anything.”

    Delivering a stone entails acute skills to slide on line and on pace, he said.

    Once sliding on target and at the right speed, releasing the stone and then touching it with any force would cause it to veer off its intended line and speed, Hritzuk said. “That would not be advantageous to good execution.”

    Canadian curling commentator John Cullen, who hosted the CBC podcast Broomgate: A Curling Scandal, said most top curlers will say that double-touching has no effect on the stone.

    As well, most top curlers will double-touch at times and don’t think it’s a foul, he said.

    “The idea that a top curler would let a rock go and then want to try to adjust it with their finger —it doesn’t seem like there’s any way you could get an advantage from that. It feels like it would be worse.”

    But as I said, the rules are the rules, and I don’t think it’s wrong to enforce them.

    tomiantT This user is from outside of this forum
    tomiantT This user is from outside of this forum
    tomiant
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    It’s strange then how this is a common strategy among cheaters in curling, and that it is exactly what the Canadian team is known for, and it is illegal to do for precisely that reason.

    Value SubtractedV D 2 Replies Last reply
    33
    • N NotSteve_

      We’re not sending our best [to the Olympics] 😞

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works
      wrote on last edited by
      #28

      Yep not impressed with this display of poor sportsmanship

      1 Reply Last reply
      12
      • T toiletobserver

        That does seem like solid proof

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        bcsven@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #29

        Its a snapshot, he could have released this handle and retracted his hand with his finger off to side of the tangent of the rock. Wed need frames before and after for better review

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • tomiantT tomiant

          It’s strange then how this is a common strategy among cheaters in curling, and that it is exactly what the Canadian team is known for, and it is illegal to do for precisely that reason.

          Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
          Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
          Value Subtracted
          wrote on last edited by
          #30

          this is a common strategy among cheaters in curling

          Very confidently stated, but I really don’t think it is.

          it is illegal to do for precisely that reason.

          It’s illegal because it’s way simpler to implement a “no touching” rule than to try to define game-changing and non game-changing touches in a way that would be enforceable.

          And again, I have absolutely no problem with the rule being enforced, even though I don’t think for a hot second that it impacted the game.

          W 1 Reply Last reply
          13
          • tomiantT tomiant

            Yes I am a violent drug addicted criminal, I don’t know maybe you’re a nice kid in school and wear shirts and stuff but around my hood we don’t.

            G This user is from outside of this forum
            G This user is from outside of this forum
            gregorgizeh@lemmy.zip
            wrote on last edited by
            #31

            You realize we are not in your hood

            tomiantT 1 Reply Last reply
            15
            • B bcsven@lemmy.ca

              Its a snapshot, he could have released this handle and retracted his hand with his finger off to side of the tangent of the rock. Wed need frames before and after for better review

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              bcsven@lemmy.ca
              wrote on last edited by
              #32

              Well in the slowed video it totally looks intentional https://youtu.be/W1yh6GN5ysks

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              22
              • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                …if said billiard ball weighed 40 lbs.

                A little finger poke ain’t gonna do shit.

                But, the rules are the rules.

                N This user is from outside of this forum
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                njm1314@lemmy.world
                wrote on last edited by njm1314@lemmy.world
                #33

                I can’t imagine why people think it wouldn’t have an effect. This is a sport where brooms have an effect. Why wouldn’t a push have an effect? And if it had no effect why do they do it?

                Value SubtractedV G 2 Replies Last reply
                20
                • Z zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                  cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

                  Sweden knew Canada’s Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

                  So they set up a camera at the ‘hog line’ to record it.

                  And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

                  tweto

                  Link Preview Image
                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                  njm1314@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #34

                  I believe they’ve been caught three times at minimum now, and for all I know more now by today. The men’s team was caught twice and the women’s team was got once.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  8
                  • T thorry@feddit.org

                    There is a line after which they are no longer allowed to touch the stone. The handles on the stone have sensors on it, to detect a touch after the line and call foul. But the Canadians touched the stone itself, not the handles. Which isn’t a legal move, but isn’t automatically detected. And with how they did it, the refs didn’t see it right away.

                    Edit: Correction, it doesn’t actually matter if it’s before or after the hog line, once the handle is released on the stone nobody is allowed to touch it anymore. The release has to be before the hog line, but there is no touching after that regardless of where the stone is.

                    Dr. BobD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Dr. BobD This user is from outside of this forum
                    Dr. Bob
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #35

                    The rules are silent on touching the stone. They are clear about not touching the handle. I don’t disagree with you, but the granite is not the handle.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • N njm1314@lemmy.world

                      I can’t imagine why people think it wouldn’t have an effect. This is a sport where brooms have an effect. Why wouldn’t a push have an effect? And if it had no effect why do they do it?

                      Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                      Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                      Value Subtracted
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #36

                      The brooms affect the ice in front of the rock, which changes the rock’s behaviour as it moves over the swept patch. You have to exert quite a bit of force to push the rock directly.

                      And if it had no effect why do they do it?

                      Sometimes by accident, I’m sure. And probably more relevant, sometimes out of sheer laziness.

                      khannie@lemmy.worldK N 2 Replies Last reply
                      3
                      • Z zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                        cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

                        Sweden knew Canada’s Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

                        So they set up a camera at the ‘hog line’ to record it.

                        And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

                        tweto

                        Link Preview Image
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        G This user is from outside of this forum
                        glide@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by glide@lemmy.ca
                        #37

                        I trust whatever committee they have at the Olympics to make the judgement on this, but if our team is cheating, fuck those guys.

                        Yes, there’s some redactionist arguments about how it “doesn’t actually impact the rock,” but fuck that. We have a codified rule that specifically says you can’t do it, and these athletes are playing at literally the highest level that exists. They know better and have had time to practice better. If they’re cheating at the Olympics, I hope it follows them forever.

                        A K A 3 Replies Last reply
                        177
                        • S sepia@mander.xyz

                          That’s cheap anti-Western propaganda provided by hexbear.

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          glide@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #38

                          I mean, fuck Hexbear, but this is in fact all over the news. I’m sure it’s posted there in an anti-west bias, but that doesn’t make it untrue, and I absolutely demand better from my country than to cheat at the Olympics.

                          F S 2 Replies Last reply
                          20
                          • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                            The brooms affect the ice in front of the rock, which changes the rock’s behaviour as it moves over the swept patch. You have to exert quite a bit of force to push the rock directly.

                            And if it had no effect why do they do it?

                            Sometimes by accident, I’m sure. And probably more relevant, sometimes out of sheer laziness.

                            khannie@lemmy.worldK This user is from outside of this forum
                            khannie@lemmy.worldK This user is from outside of this forum
                            khannie@lemmy.world
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #39

                            Ah let’s be honest here… That was neither laziness nor accidental.

                            Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
                            15
                            • G glide@lemmy.ca

                              I trust whatever committee they have at the Olympics to make the judgement on this, but if our team is cheating, fuck those guys.

                              Yes, there’s some redactionist arguments about how it “doesn’t actually impact the rock,” but fuck that. We have a codified rule that specifically says you can’t do it, and these athletes are playing at literally the highest level that exists. They know better and have had time to practice better. If they’re cheating at the Olympics, I hope it follows them forever.

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              aim_at_me@lemmy.nz
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #40

                              If it doesn’t impact the rock, then why do they risk breaking the rules to do it?

                              G S 2 Replies Last reply
                              94
                              • A aim_at_me@lemmy.nz

                                If it doesn’t impact the rock, then why do they risk breaking the rules to do it?

                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                G This user is from outside of this forum
                                glide@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by glide@lemmy.ca
                                #41

                                Because extreme cases can impact the rock. Barely touching the rock in the way caught on film realistically isn’t impacting the rock, but the rule needs to exist to prevent someone from actively pushing the rock after letting go.

                                But again, these guys know better and have had the time and resources to train better.

                                wraithgear@lemmy.worldW B 2 Replies Last reply
                                21
                                • khannie@lemmy.worldK khannie@lemmy.world

                                  Ah let’s be honest here… That was neither laziness nor accidental.

                                  Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Value Subtracted
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #42

                                  Look, I find extending a finger to give the stone a boop after release completely baffling…but there’s no chance at all that it affected the trajectory of the thing. You might as well “cheat” by blowing on it.

                                  khannie@lemmy.worldK S 2 Replies Last reply
                                  3
                                  • A aim_at_me@lemmy.nz

                                    If it doesn’t impact the rock, then why do they risk breaking the rules to do it?

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #43

                                    It can prevent over-rotation of the rock. He knew exactly what he was doing.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    58
                                    • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                                      …if said billiard ball weighed 40 lbs.

                                      A little finger poke ain’t gonna do shit.

                                      But, the rules are the rules.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #44

                                      A little finger poke ain’t gonna do shit.

                                      a slight drag will prevent over -rotation of the stone.

                                      Regardless, it’s a fucking rule.

                                      Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
                                      23
                                      • S savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca

                                        A little finger poke ain’t gonna do shit.

                                        a slight drag will prevent over -rotation of the stone.

                                        Regardless, it’s a fucking rule.

                                        Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Value Subtracted
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #45

                                        I have said several time that I have no problem with the rule being enforced.

                                        a slight drag will prevent over -rotation of the stone.

                                        I really don’t think so, especially the light touch that I’ve seen on video (which, to be fair, was Homan’s throw on the women’s side). Again, these things are damn heavy, and you’re not going to push them around with a finger without making a visible effort.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                                          Having curled myself, I can assure you it does not…and if it did make a difference, it would almost certainly be negative, since you’re giving up any semblance of control that you had on the actual throw. There’s not going to be some “precision poke” that magically steers it where it needs to go. But don’t take my word for it.

                                          Does it make any difference?

                                          “No. The double-touching that I’ve seen has been incidental contact, and that’s fingers brushing or hand brushing on a 40-pound piece of granite,” said Eugene Hritzuk, a Canadian curler based in Saskatoon who has been involved in competitive curling and coaching for more than 60 years.

                                          “What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event? You need the palm on your hand against that stone to do anything.”

                                          Delivering a stone entails acute skills to slide on line and on pace, he said.

                                          Once sliding on target and at the right speed, releasing the stone and then touching it with any force would cause it to veer off its intended line and speed, Hritzuk said. “That would not be advantageous to good execution.”

                                          Canadian curling commentator John Cullen, who hosted the CBC podcast Broomgate: A Curling Scandal, said most top curlers will say that double-touching has no effect on the stone.

                                          As well, most top curlers will double-touch at times and don’t think it’s a foul, he said.

                                          “The idea that a top curler would let a rock go and then want to try to adjust it with their finger —it doesn’t seem like there’s any way you could get an advantage from that. It feels like it would be worse.”

                                          But as I said, the rules are the rules, and I don’t think it’s wrong to enforce them.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          savethetuahawk@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #46

                                          Having curled myself,

                                          dude…people do this when they over-rotate the stone after letting go of the handle. It’s not about steering or momentum forward. a slight drag will reduce the rotation.

                                          There is no reason to be pointing a finger on release.

                                          Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
                                          19

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post