The deathly gaze passes over all of you...
-
this is peak GMing
-
Every table is different but I don’t think this would fly at my table. It’s a little metagamey to ask unless you have reason to believe they would, so if they were told in character to look away but maybe the players themselves forgot where it’s not something the PCs would forget. It feels a little adversarial. Combat is often rough to begin with and imposing disadvantage for no reason other than it punishes them for taking cues from the DM seems like it’s stretching it unnecessarily. But every table really is different and it may have been super fun for everyone, I don’t know.
-
Sometimes I roll dice just to mess with my players.
-
Sometimes I roll dice just to mess with my players.
Did you also get the eyeless dice, so you can roll a whole handful even if you only need to roll like two?
-
Did you also get the eyeless dice, so you can roll a whole handful even if you only need to roll like two?
Eyeless dice?
-
Every table is different but I don’t think this would fly at my table. It’s a little metagamey to ask unless you have reason to believe they would, so if they were told in character to look away but maybe the players themselves forgot where it’s not something the PCs would forget. It feels a little adversarial. Combat is often rough to begin with and imposing disadvantage for no reason other than it punishes them for taking cues from the DM seems like it’s stretching it unnecessarily. But every table really is different and it may have been super fun for everyone, I don’t know.
The DM can not metagame, definitionally
-
this is peak GMing
I think it is - in fact - the exact opposite of it. It’s gaslighting and player vs. DM mentality. If I was a player, I would have a serious word with the DM afterwards and when I am the DM, I refrain from such actions altogether.
-
I think it is - in fact - the exact opposite of it. It’s gaslighting and player vs. DM mentality. If I was a player, I would have a serious word with the DM afterwards and when I am the DM, I refrain from such actions altogether.
My response was (is?) tongue and cheek.
Generally, I think it’s best for the GM to give the players an accurate, understandable, and consistent view of the world. If the local townsfolk have said The creature up the hill turns people to stone when they gaze upon it! then this is a perfectly reasonable course of action, even if the monster doesn’t have a gaze attack, so long as the PCs trust the villagers. The villagers just happen to be wrong in this case.
If the PCs have a reason to doubt their senses (in D&D/Shadowrun that might be due to a charm, etc; or in Cyberpunk/Shadowrun it could be cyberpsychosis) then it’s also pretty reasonable.
Can the GM do it once to troll the players? Sure.
Would it be annoying if the GM made a habit of it? Probably.
Is it funny for a meme? Yes.
-
My response was (is?) tongue and cheek.
Generally, I think it’s best for the GM to give the players an accurate, understandable, and consistent view of the world. If the local townsfolk have said The creature up the hill turns people to stone when they gaze upon it! then this is a perfectly reasonable course of action, even if the monster doesn’t have a gaze attack, so long as the PCs trust the villagers. The villagers just happen to be wrong in this case.
If the PCs have a reason to doubt their senses (in D&D/Shadowrun that might be due to a charm, etc; or in Cyberpunk/Shadowrun it could be cyberpsychosis) then it’s also pretty reasonable.
Can the GM do it once to troll the players? Sure.
Would it be annoying if the GM made a habit of it? Probably.
Is it funny for a meme? Yes.
I think it would depend on the table. I for one know I would not like it.
-
I think it would depend on the table. I for one know I would not like it.
Totally fair. Every table is different.