Stop Killing Games: New option available to get law passed! [about upcoming EU's Digital Fairness Act and convergence with SKG]
-
-
I’d love the initiative to start something that would overflow to us here in Canada.
There are a couple games in my Steam library that are just dormant due to the servers being shut down. Having the possibility to own and run a server for these games would be awesome.
Edit: Misread the articles, my bad.
-
Anyone else getting a Forbidden message that resembles the one from Anubis?
-
I’d love the initiative to start something that would overflow to us here in Canada.
There are a couple games in my Steam library that are just dormant due to the servers being shut down. Having the possibility to own and run a server for these games would be awesome.
Edit: Misread the articles, my bad.
This initiative does not seek to be retroactive.
-
This initiative does not seek to be retroactive.
Damn, I misread the articles. Still a good thing if it goes forward.
-
I’d love the initiative to start something that would overflow to us here in Canada.
There are a couple games in my Steam library that are just dormant due to the servers being shut down. Having the possibility to own and run a server for these games would be awesome.
Edit: Misread the articles, my bad.
A future requirement means the cost of these changes, if required at the end of life, should be factored into the company’s plans for the game already. Not a retroactive cost/burden the company didn’t plan for and may not have the financial resources to spend for already end of life products.
Unless the game was designed to be offline or use alternative server systems, it still requires development time to implement. And as well all know, bugs are a thing, what sort of requirement for support would be required for implementing those changes? Can they just slap something together with AI coding and say that’s what we get? They made the change and they’re done with it?