Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
117 Posts 60 Posters 6 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

    Simon GreenwoodS This user is from outside of this forum
    Simon GreenwoodS This user is from outside of this forum
    Simon Greenwood
    wrote last edited by
    #105

    @cstross I don't doubt for a moment that the big age verification shops have smelled blood in the water and have geared up their lobbying everywhere and told our technologically challenged governments that it's frictionless and completely secure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

      RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

      UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

      *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

      Simon ZerafaS This user is from outside of this forum
      Simon ZerafaS This user is from outside of this forum
      Simon Zerafa
      wrote last edited by
      #106

      @cstross

      Makes you wonder how all these remote workers will manage without a VPN connection to their employers IT infrastructure 😉

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Only OhmO Only Ohm

        @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0

        Recursing that, it also defines "consumer" as a person not acting in the course of a business, so workplace VPNs are out of scope too.

        Christine Burns MBE 🏳️‍⚧️📚⧖C This user is from outside of this forum
        Christine Burns MBE 🏳️‍⚧️📚⧖C This user is from outside of this forum
        Christine Burns MBE 🏳️‍⚧️📚⧖
        wrote last edited by
        #107

        @only_ohm @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 That was my first thought, given that the whole idea of distributed working across a company’s office locations and working from home relies on virtual private networking. VPNs are not just for concealing your current location. Modern business life relies on them. Otherwise we’re back to leased lines.

        Only OhmO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

          RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

          UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

          *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

          jay 🌺:disabled_heart:J This user is from outside of this forum
          jay 🌺:disabled_heart:J This user is from outside of this forum
          jay 🌺:disabled_heart:
          wrote last edited by
          #108

          boost with CW: ukpol, OSA

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

            @cstross vpns have their place in corporate networks.

            There they provide secure access to internal resources for remote workers.

            They are all but useless for personal privacy / anonymity.

            So while I agree with the principle of your objection to govts gating services - it is actually a faux battle based on misinformation by the VPN industry.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            aliengasmask
            wrote last edited by
            #109

            @oschonrock @cstross but how do you prevent ip tracking by advertisers without a vpn? Vpns are necessary to close off that last bit of data.

            Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A aliengasmask

              @oschonrock @cstross but how do you prevent ip tracking by advertisers without a vpn? Vpns are necessary to close off that last bit of data.

              Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
              Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
              Oliver Schönrock
              wrote last edited by
              #110

              @aliengasmask @cstross

              ip tracking is not "the last bit of data"..it's the first. Advertisers are much smarter than that. This is one of the myths perpetuated by VPN vendors.

              If you care, TOR browser will help with many more of their tricks. (Still Not all... If you need proper anonymity use "tails" and proper op-sec)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Christine Burns MBE 🏳️‍⚧️📚⧖C Christine Burns MBE 🏳️‍⚧️📚⧖

                @only_ohm @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0 That was my first thought, given that the whole idea of distributed working across a company’s office locations and working from home relies on virtual private networking. VPNs are not just for concealing your current location. Modern business life relies on them. Otherwise we’re back to leased lines.

                Only OhmO This user is from outside of this forum
                Only OhmO This user is from outside of this forum
                Only Ohm
                wrote last edited by
                #111

                @christineburns @dan @jaawerth @cstross @Nicovel0

                Employers are (unfortunately, IMO) required to collect employees' official identity documents for immigration control purposes anyway, so presumably even if the legislation had applied to workplace VPNs, age verification there would have been easy.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • JesseJ Jesse

                  @dan @only_ohm @cstross @Nicovel0 the language is inexact so they can make it mean what they think it should, yeah. or more accurate they hope they'll figure it out later when stuff comes up. Like "provided to a significant number of persons" could mean literally anything, even if we could theorycraft what it probably means

                  As for TOR, well, my guess is it qualifies but enforcing it is another question. Possible, but seems like it'd just be wack-a-mole

                  Only OhmO This user is from outside of this forum
                  Only OhmO This user is from outside of this forum
                  Only Ohm
                  wrote last edited by
                  #112

                  @jaawerth @dan @cstross @Nicovel0

                  In a sense, inexactitude is good, because the Human Rights Act requires the courts to interpret all other legislation, as far as possible, in a way compatible with the ECHR rights, and all else being equal, greater vagueness will enable them to do that better.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                    RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                    UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                    *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                    David SP This user is from outside of this forum
                    David SP This user is from outside of this forum
                    David S
                    wrote last edited by
                    #113

                    @cstross

                    Good luck to the government making every company register every adhoc vpn between sites, or even my home Tailscale to my parents...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Oliver SchönrockO Oliver Schönrock

                      @Ulrich_the_elder @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad TBF... Blair was better..

                      He communicated better. So he managed to achieve more things that a labour govt should..

                      Notably in education for him..

                      But yeah he fucked it up by being a religious nutcase going on crusades in the middle east...(Very Tory) Among other things

                      Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦
                      wrote last edited by
                      #114

                      @oschonrock @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Blair being slightly less horrible is not a reason to have a fucking tory lead the labour party. The labour party when led by a tory is the tory party.

                      Oliver SchönrockO 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦U Ulrich_the_Elder, 🇨🇦,🇺🇦

                        @oschonrock @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad Blair being slightly less horrible is not a reason to have a fucking tory lead the labour party. The labour party when led by a tory is the tory party.

                        Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                        Oliver SchönrockO This user is from outside of this forum
                        Oliver Schönrock
                        wrote last edited by
                        #115

                        @Ulrich_the_elder @cstross @Fonant @PeterSommerlad

                        I don't necessarily disagree, but you sound like one of those boring people who see everything in black and white.

                        So I am not engaging with that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Charlie StrossC Charlie Stross

                          RE: https://social.vivaldi.net/@LonM/115966748145817371

                          UK PEOPLE: this is REALLY IMPORTANT. If the government bans under-16s from using VPNs, then logically they must intend to REQUIRE AGE VERIFICATION FOR ALL VPN USE. Which will affect adults too!

                          *Your* privacy and right to anonymous web browsing is at risk!

                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          W This user is from outside of this forum
                          Andy Wootton
                          wrote last edited by
                          #116

                          @cstross Only if I want to access content that's not appropriate for under-16s. If I did, I'd watch TV. I think I heard a Labour minister celebrating that compulsory age-checks on pr0n sites had greatly reduced consumption. There goes another successful UK industry. I wonder what the punters did with their sexual frustration instead? MPs can have that question free, to ask at PMQs.

                          Charlie StrossC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Andy Wootton

                            @cstross Only if I want to access content that's not appropriate for under-16s. If I did, I'd watch TV. I think I heard a Labour minister celebrating that compulsory age-checks on pr0n sites had greatly reduced consumption. There goes another successful UK industry. I wonder what the punters did with their sexual frustration instead? MPs can have that question free, to ask at PMQs.

                            Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Charlie StrossC This user is from outside of this forum
                            Charlie Stross
                            wrote last edited by
                            #117

                            @woo Weirdly, VPN users rose by *almost exactly* the same number as the fall in age-verified porn users. Fancy that!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post