Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans

Tesla Robotaxis Reportedly Crashing at a Rate That's 4x Higher Than Humans

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
63 Posts 49 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works

    Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

    Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

    The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR This user is from outside of this forum
    roofuskit@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #51

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com

      Cameras are inferior to human vision in many ways. Especially the ones used on Teslas.

      A This user is from outside of this forum
      A This user is from outside of this forum
      alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #52

      Lower dynamic range for one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E excessshiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        Eh, not really though. Generally if your car is stopped, even in the middle of the road, you are not at fault if someone else hits you. You can still get fined for obstruction of traffic, but the incident is entirely the fault of the moving vehicle.

        U This user is from outside of this forum
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        uienia@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #53

        If you stop in the middle of a highway you absolutely are at fault.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lechekaflanL lechekaflan

          I do (sarcastically) love knowing Leave the World Behind is a documentary.

          O This user is from outside of this forum
          O This user is from outside of this forum
          ours@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #54

          Thanks Obama.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K knock_knock_lemmy_in@lemmy.world

            Can’t do that. Then he would have to upgrade all legacy cars. And he is missing the lidar dataset.

            R This user is from outside of this forum
            R This user is from outside of this forum
            ramenshaman@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #55

            The best time to add lidar would have been years ago, the second best time is right now. I don’t think he would have to update the old cars, it could just be part of the hardware V5 package. He’s obviously comfortable with having customers beta testing production vehicles so he can start creating a lidar set now or he can continue failing to make reliable self-driving cars.

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works

              Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

              Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

              The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

              X This user is from outside of this forum
              X This user is from outside of this forum
              xSikes
              wrote last edited by
              #56

              And newsom doesn’t give a shit

              7 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R ramenshaman@lemmy.world

                The best time to add lidar would have been years ago, the second best time is right now. I don’t think he would have to update the old cars, it could just be part of the hardware V5 package. He’s obviously comfortable with having customers beta testing production vehicles so he can start creating a lidar set now or he can continue failing to make reliable self-driving cars.

                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                knock_knock_lemmy_in@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #57

                I agree with you. Musk’s ego doesn’t.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A ageedizzle

                  I agree it would be better. I’m just saying that in theory cameras are all that would be required to achieve human level performance, so long as the AI was capable enough

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
                  wrote last edited by
                  #58

                  Except humans have self cleaning lenses. Cars don’t.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • AngelaA Angela shared this topic
                  • S spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works

                    Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

                    Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

                    The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

                    Misuse CaseM This user is from outside of this forum
                    Misuse CaseM This user is from outside of this forum
                    Misuse Case
                    wrote last edited by
                    #59

                    @spaghettiwestern @AngelaPreston But but but. They told us self-driving cars would be safer than human drivers.

                    AngelaA 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works

                      Self-driving cars are often marketed as safer than human drivers, but new data suggests that may not always be the case.

                      Citing data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Electrek reports that Tesla disclosed five new crashes involving its robotaxi fleet in Austin. The new data raises concerns about how safe Tesla’s systems really are compared to the average driver.

                      The incidents included a collision with a fixed object at 17 miles per hour, a crash with a bus while the Tesla vehicle was stopped, a crash with a truck at four miles per hour, and two cases where Tesla vehicles backed into fixed objects at low speeds.

                      😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈M This user is from outside of this forum
                      😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈M This user is from outside of this forum
                      😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈
                      wrote last edited by
                      #60

                      Musk = POS Nazi.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N notmyoldredditname@lemmy.world

                        Are they even insured like typical insurance?

                        If Tesla owns it, don’t they just pay out of pocket as needed, they don’t actually have a monthly payment to themselves or anything?

                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        copd@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #61

                        There’s no way, then why can’t I drive around “uninsured” with the promise I’ll pay out of my pocket for any damage.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • X xSikes

                          And newsom doesn’t give a shit

                          7 This user is from outside of this forum
                          7 This user is from outside of this forum
                          73ms@sopuli.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          What does this have to do with Newsom? Tesla isn’t allowed to operate this way in California, the accidents are from the Texas data.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Misuse CaseM Misuse Case

                            @spaghettiwestern @AngelaPreston But but but. They told us self-driving cars would be safer than human drivers.

                            AngelaA This user is from outside of this forum
                            AngelaA This user is from outside of this forum
                            Angela
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            @MisuseCase @spaghettiwestern Right?! How could they say it if it wasn't true? /sarcasm

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post