Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I didn't realize that Swiss trains apparently also adhere to the "schedule for 80% of capacity rule".

I didn't realize that Swiss trains apparently also adhere to the "schedule for 80% of capacity rule".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • yoshY This user is from outside of this forum
    yoshY This user is from outside of this forum
    yosh
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I didn't realize that Swiss trains apparently also adhere to the "schedule for 80% of capacity rule".

    Apparently trains in Switzerland go around 80% of the top speed possible on the track. The 20% overhead is used to make up time in the case of delays.

    The thinking is: stable and predictable operation is more important than going faster. Because the cost of passengers regularly missing layovers is much higher than the benefits of trains being 20% faster.

    Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • yoshY yosh

      I didn't realize that Swiss trains apparently also adhere to the "schedule for 80% of capacity rule".

      Apparently trains in Switzerland go around 80% of the top speed possible on the track. The 20% overhead is used to make up time in the case of delays.

      The thinking is: stable and predictable operation is more important than going faster. Because the cost of passengers regularly missing layovers is much higher than the benefits of trains being 20% faster.

      Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂S This user is from outside of this forum
      Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂S This user is from outside of this forum
      Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @yosh this is something ive felt intuitively as well, but is there research to specifically the 80% number here?

      NullN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂S Autism Jo :neocat_comfy: :v_enby: 🍂

        @yosh this is something ive felt intuitively as well, but is there research to specifically the 80% number here?

        NullN This user is from outside of this forum
        NullN This user is from outside of this forum
        Null
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @ShadowJonathan@tech.lgbt @yosh@toot.yosh.is Not specifically research, but a lot of Lean Manufacturing ideologies use the same principle and that's where I assume this comes from. For factories it operates under the same idea - a manufacturing line which is run under full capacity all the time has no slack in its budget to handle routine maintenance, floor rearrangements, slowdowns, or mistakes.

        There's a lesson here I've been trying to beat into some of my managers heads for decades at this point...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Jürgen HubertJ Jürgen Hubert shared this topic

        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post