Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. China completes most powerful hypergravity centrifuge

China completes most powerful hypergravity centrifuge

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
science
12 Posts 8 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • noumenon@lemmy.worldN noumenon@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    Link Preview Image
    China's record 1900g-tonne hypergravity machine compresses space, time

    China's hypergravity centrifuge CHIEF1900 has a capacity of 1900g-tonnes and dethrones compatriot CHIEF1300.

    favicon

    Interesting Engineering (interestingengineering.com)

    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    For some reason the ‘article’ mentions compressing space and time multiple times. Does it really though? Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I can’t imagine large centrifugal forces inducing any relativistic effects.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    6
    • noumenon@lemmy.worldN noumenon@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      Link Preview Image
      China's record 1900g-tonne hypergravity machine compresses space, time

      China's hypergravity centrifuge CHIEF1900 has a capacity of 1900g-tonnes and dethrones compatriot CHIEF1300.

      favicon

      Interesting Engineering (interestingengineering.com)

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      bigdickenergy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      “Hypergravity” centrifuge? Isn’t that just a centrifuge? Are there any hypogravity centrifuges?

      theneverfox@pawb.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      5
      • B bigdickenergy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        “Hypergravity” centrifuge? Isn’t that just a centrifuge? Are there any hypogravity centrifuges?

        theneverfox@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        theneverfox@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
        theneverfox@pawb.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Let’s define hyper gravity first…I have no idea what that could even mean

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        2
        • K kratzkopf@discuss.tchncs.de

          For some reason the ‘article’ mentions compressing space and time multiple times. Does it really though? Maybe I’m misunderstanding, but I can’t imagine large centrifugal forces inducing any relativistic effects.

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Only if it goes at a statistically significant % of the speed of light, I think. Artificial “gravity” it creates should not have any relativistic effects, AFAIK. These only show up at proximity to large masses (real gravity).

          7 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          2
          • noumenon@lemmy.worldN noumenon@lemmy.world
            This post did not contain any content.
            Link Preview Image
            China's record 1900g-tonne hypergravity machine compresses space, time

            China's hypergravity centrifuge CHIEF1900 has a capacity of 1900g-tonnes and dethrones compatriot CHIEF1300.

            favicon

            Interesting Engineering (interestingengineering.com)

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            skanky@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Did a little research on this thing. Its capacity is 1900 g-tons, meaning that it can take a payload of 1000 kg (one metric ton) and spin it to apply 1900 G’s.

            Is 1 ton it’s weight limit? Dunno.

            Is it limited to 1900 G? Dunno.

            The “compressing space time” statement is just poor journalism. They’re referring to the fact that they can perform accelerated testing because of the higher limits. Basically, a test might take 2 days instead of 10 because it can go harder. Yes, it’s that stupid.

            A M 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            12
            • A acockworkorange@mander.xyz

              Only if it goes at a statistically significant % of the speed of light, I think. Artificial “gravity” it creates should not have any relativistic effects, AFAIK. These only show up at proximity to large masses (real gravity).

              7 This user is from outside of this forum
              7 This user is from outside of this forum
              7toed@midwest.social
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              And even 1900x Earth masses would have a time interval of 0.9999986774:1

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              2
              • S skanky@lemmy.world

                Did a little research on this thing. Its capacity is 1900 g-tons, meaning that it can take a payload of 1000 kg (one metric ton) and spin it to apply 1900 G’s.

                Is 1 ton it’s weight limit? Dunno.

                Is it limited to 1900 G? Dunno.

                The “compressing space time” statement is just poor journalism. They’re referring to the fact that they can perform accelerated testing because of the higher limits. Basically, a test might take 2 days instead of 10 because it can go harder. Yes, it’s that stupid.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                acockworkorange@mander.xyz
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                You da real MVP.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                2
                • S skanky@lemmy.world

                  Did a little research on this thing. Its capacity is 1900 g-tons, meaning that it can take a payload of 1000 kg (one metric ton) and spin it to apply 1900 G’s.

                  Is 1 ton it’s weight limit? Dunno.

                  Is it limited to 1900 G? Dunno.

                  The “compressing space time” statement is just poor journalism. They’re referring to the fact that they can perform accelerated testing because of the higher limits. Basically, a test might take 2 days instead of 10 because it can go harder. Yes, it’s that stupid.

                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  M This user is from outside of this forum
                  marcos@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by marcos@lemmy.world
                  #9

                  Is 1 ton it’s weight limit? Dunno.

                  Its weight limit is 19 MN. You can divide it in any reasonable product of payload mass and apparent gravity you want.

                  It would be way more practical to label it by the actual weight than that gravity*mass bullshit. But engineering has some boneheaded practices that people insist on keeping alive, mostly for gatekeeping.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  1
                  • M marcos@lemmy.world

                    Is 1 ton it’s weight limit? Dunno.

                    Its weight limit is 19 MN. You can divide it in any reasonable product of payload mass and apparent gravity you want.

                    It would be way more practical to label it by the actual weight than that gravity*mass bullshit. But engineering has some boneheaded practices that people insist on keeping alive, mostly for gatekeeping.

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    skanky@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Its weight limit is 19 MN. You can divide it in any reasonable product of payload mass and apparent gravity you want.

                    Doubt

                    You’re assuming that it has the ability to spin faster at lower loading. There’s certainly an upper limit to how fast it can go (because of motor limits, gearing, etc).

                    In reality, the limits for this machine are probably best described by a payload vs. speed chart.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    1
                    • S skanky@lemmy.world

                      Its weight limit is 19 MN. You can divide it in any reasonable product of payload mass and apparent gravity you want.

                      Doubt

                      You’re assuming that it has the ability to spin faster at lower loading. There’s certainly an upper limit to how fast it can go (because of motor limits, gearing, etc).

                      In reality, the limits for this machine are probably best described by a payload vs. speed chart.

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      marcos@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      You can always move the payload away from the centrifuge, you don’t have to spin any slower or faster.

                      The maximum apparent gravity is still fixed, but it’s a direct consequence of the materials available so there’s some industry standard chart somewhere where you can put those 1900 g-ton and read how many gs you can get.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • ScienceS Science shared this topic on
                      • M marcos@lemmy.world

                        You can always move the payload away from the centrifuge, you don’t have to spin any slower or faster.

                        The maximum apparent gravity is still fixed, but it’s a direct consequence of the materials available so there’s some industry standard chart somewhere where you can put those 1900 g-ton and read how many gs you can get.

                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                        skanky@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Pretty sure that’s not practical in this case. Theoretically? Sure.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post