Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Here's a thought experiment.

Here's a thought experiment.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmpoll
28 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

    @gisgeek My avatar image was drawn by an illustrator on a commission. I don't have the skills to draw. 😅

    (That reminds me, I really should reach out to them to commission an update)

    Though my question wasn't about your intention with the image, but rather what the audience/reader associates with it, when seeing it.

    I think that their thoughts matter, though of course this doesn't have to mean their thoughts matter _to you_. (And that's fine, really. You do you! 😸)

    Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
    Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
    Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @sjn I understand the point of view of artists and creators. Being used for neural net training is not something many of them have ever contemplated. Which is fine, but licenses and copyright exist for that.
    But it's a totally different matter. Again, it is not about quality, and I could cite that photography was not considered art in the old days. At that time, a drawing was art, a photo a mere reproduction of reality. Perceptions of such things change a lot. We live in interesting times.

    Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

      @sjn I understand the point of view of artists and creators. Being used for neural net training is not something many of them have ever contemplated. Which is fine, but licenses and copyright exist for that.
      But it's a totally different matter. Again, it is not about quality, and I could cite that photography was not considered art in the old days. At that time, a drawing was art, a photo a mere reproduction of reality. Perceptions of such things change a lot. We live in interesting times.

      Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
      Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
      Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @sjn It is also one (not the main) reason why none of my drawings have been published on the web by me. Sure, I could add a license and copyright (but I would probably use a CC-BY license), but that would not prevent possible abuses.
      Of course, creators are now extremely worried about their role and future, but none did the same when CGI was introduced in cinema (and that is largely computer-generated, with no ridiculous marks).
      So maybe people should b more ehm, coherent...

      Salve J. NilsenS mathewM 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

        @sjn It is also one (not the main) reason why none of my drawings have been published on the web by me. Sure, I could add a license and copyright (but I would probably use a CC-BY license), but that would not prevent possible abuses.
        Of course, creators are now extremely worried about their role and future, but none did the same when CGI was introduced in cinema (and that is largely computer-generated, with no ridiculous marks).
        So maybe people should b more ehm, coherent...

        Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
        Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
        Salve J. Nilsen
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @gisgeek what do you mean with "be more coherent"?

        Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

          @gisgeek what do you mean with "be more coherent"?

          Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
          Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
          Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @sjn Simply, I see such AI things as yet other tools; it is not the end of the world, and fighting against them is no different from fighting against cameras, digital art, CGI in cinema, the whole cinema (versus theatre), and so on. So why AI mark only? One could add the Handcrafted mark vs Industrial. Is that a quality marker? Not necessary so: a lot of handcrafted things are simply bad products, plain and clean.

          Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Salve J. NilsenS 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

            @sjn Simply, I see such AI things as yet other tools; it is not the end of the world, and fighting against them is no different from fighting against cameras, digital art, CGI in cinema, the whole cinema (versus theatre), and so on. So why AI mark only? One could add the Handcrafted mark vs Industrial. Is that a quality marker? Not necessary so: a lot of handcrafted things are simply bad products, plain and clean.

            Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
            Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
            Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @sjn
            Anyway, thanks for your poll; it sparked a possible blog post where I could better articulate why quality is a human-driven goal, not something intrinsically present or absent in AI-aided design. High-quality or good enough are often the choices in many fields, regardless of tools.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

              @sjn Simply, I see such AI things as yet other tools; it is not the end of the world, and fighting against them is no different from fighting against cameras, digital art, CGI in cinema, the whole cinema (versus theatre), and so on. So why AI mark only? One could add the Handcrafted mark vs Industrial. Is that a quality marker? Not necessary so: a lot of handcrafted things are simply bad products, plain and clean.

              Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
              Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
              Salve J. Nilsen
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @gisgeek I get your analogies, though I'm afraid they might be failing you.

              The #LLM tools today aren't like CGI or digital art or the introduction of television.

              Your examples are are tools of the hand and of trade and markets.

              #AI tools are tools of the mind. They aren't just a support for thinking, but increasingly a _replacement_ for thinking, and this includes all the consequences that come from this.

              We regulated the use of tools to avoid the bad behavior. Maybe do the same with AI?

              Salve J. NilsenS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                @gisgeek I get your analogies, though I'm afraid they might be failing you.

                The #LLM tools today aren't like CGI or digital art or the introduction of television.

                Your examples are are tools of the hand and of trade and markets.

                #AI tools are tools of the mind. They aren't just a support for thinking, but increasingly a _replacement_ for thinking, and this includes all the consequences that come from this.

                We regulated the use of tools to avoid the bad behavior. Maybe do the same with AI?

                Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                Salve J. Nilsen
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @gisgeek I think polls like these are useful for identifying where it would make sense to introduce a "Drivers license for #AI".

                Clearly, this tool is being used to hurt people today – in too many ways to list here.

                Does the few positive/constructive use cases weigh up against the damage that is done by #LLM tools today?

                Clearly not.

                And this is important because we don't live on our separate software/tech bubbles. We live in a society, together with everyone else.

                Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                  @gisgeek I think polls like these are useful for identifying where it would make sense to introduce a "Drivers license for #AI".

                  Clearly, this tool is being used to hurt people today – in too many ways to list here.

                  Does the few positive/constructive use cases weigh up against the damage that is done by #LLM tools today?

                  Clearly not.

                  And this is important because we don't live on our separate software/tech bubbles. We live in a society, together with everyone else.

                  Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
                  Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
                  Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @sjn Ah sure, the impact of AI on society is a much larger topic, my observation was only about simplicistic labeling of quality for human-only vs AI-aided tasking. I'm worried too for many aspects of the AI-revolution, but which are largely due to our (as a whole society) total incapacity of managing changes in a proper way, for instance in order to avoid leaving people behind.

                  Salve J. NilsenS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

                    @sjn Ah sure, the impact of AI on society is a much larger topic, my observation was only about simplicistic labeling of quality for human-only vs AI-aided tasking. I'm worried too for many aspects of the AI-revolution, but which are largely due to our (as a whole society) total incapacity of managing changes in a proper way, for instance in order to avoid leaving people behind.

                    Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                    Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                    Salve J. Nilsen
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @gisgeek The impact of #AI on society isn't actually such a large topic.

                    We can easily cut right through the rhetoric and complexities, and ask one simple question:

                    Does using #AI help us create a society that is better for all of us?

                    Those who say yes tend to be of the techno-optimist type, always hoping, looking forward, maybe a bit naïve?

                    Those who say no tend to be the realist type, looking at what happens today and shaking their head in dissent.

                    Those who are deep experts, shout #NoAI!

                    Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                      Here's a thought experiment.

                      Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                      If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                      If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                      (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                      LeendaalL This user is from outside of this forum
                      LeendaalL This user is from outside of this forum
                      Leendaal
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @sjn i mean in the end this is not about the actual result just about a signal ai in general IS error prone because it has to be.

                      So quality control aside, someone decided to go for an error prone production process and a large quantity of product both these things signal a lower production quality. And no single individual cared enough to do it themselves.

                      For art, for me art is a human expression, ai automaticallly fails. Can it create pleasing images or the like sure. Doesn't matter.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                        @gisgeek The impact of #AI on society isn't actually such a large topic.

                        We can easily cut right through the rhetoric and complexities, and ask one simple question:

                        Does using #AI help us create a society that is better for all of us?

                        Those who say yes tend to be of the techno-optimist type, always hoping, looking forward, maybe a bit naïve?

                        Those who say no tend to be the realist type, looking at what happens today and shaking their head in dissent.

                        Those who are deep experts, shout #NoAI!

                        Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
                        Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G This user is from outside of this forum
                        Francesco P Lovergine :debian:
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @sjn ROTFL, if the world were in black and white, we would have lived in a perfect society for ages. Unfortunately, there is nothing that is good or bad a priori, and the future is always in the fog. If one were to base a decision on what it seems at the present time, we probably would still live in a forest. Changes are never good for all people, so the logical decision would be no changes at all.

                        Salve J. NilsenS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

                          @sjn
                          Ah nice example the image. Let me explain. Incidentally, I'm perfectly able to draw a self-portrait of myself in Moebius style. But I had no intention to do that for a series of reason, including the time to dedicate to use ink and colors for that (I'm an old fashioned amateur comic book artist). I deliberately choose to not doing that. So the use of AI says exactly nothing about me (i.e, it is not relevant) which is the point. Did you draw your avatar personally?

                          Corinna (versiffte Göre)N This user is from outside of this forum
                          Corinna (versiffte Göre)N This user is from outside of this forum
                          Corinna (versiffte Göre)
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @gisgeek @sjn it tells me that you consider your profile picnot worthy of any effort.

                          Like my all year Christmas version of my photo tells people I'm too lazy to switch my pic accordingly.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Francesco P Lovergine :debian:G Francesco P Lovergine :debian:

                            @sjn ROTFL, if the world were in black and white, we would have lived in a perfect society for ages. Unfortunately, there is nothing that is good or bad a priori, and the future is always in the fog. If one were to base a decision on what it seems at the present time, we probably would still live in a forest. Changes are never good for all people, so the logical decision would be no changes at all.

                            Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                            Salve J. NilsenS This user is from outside of this forum
                            Salve J. Nilsen
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @gisgeek Yeah, nothing's perfect, and expecting something to be so is just as naïve as huffing hopium while waiting for someone else to decide how our future turns out.

                            We get to ask the questions, say what is desirable and what is not, and use our influence to help steer our society in a positive direction, through political engagement, lawmaking, public discourse and consensus-building.

                            Yes, this isn't black/white, but simple questions can help us see if this shade of grey is dark or light.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                              Here's a thought experiment.

                              Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                              If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                              If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                              (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              Bigfood
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @sjn
                              I'm not in to art, only listening to music.
                              I would notice the difference between a AI picture or a human made one, if there are no bad errors like 6 fingers on one hand.

                              There is a AI band, except mastering everything is done by the AI, trained by humans on contract.
                              The songs are good enough for me to store on my phone.

                              As far as I got the LLM stuff, everything depends on the prompt.

                              ATM LLMs are only a better search engine for me, but only used if normal search isn't getting me the results in searching for.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                Here's a thought experiment.

                                Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                WooShellW This user is from outside of this forum
                                WooShellW This user is from outside of this forum
                                WooShell
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @sjn I don't necessarily expect lower quality, but I do at the very least know that creative rights have been violated in creating it, so I would be less inclined to buy/use it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                  Here's a thought experiment.

                                  Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                  If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                  If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                  (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                  buheratorB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  buheratorB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  buherator
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21
                                  @sjn Assuming by AI we mean LLMs, this stamp would essentially say "no one cared to think this through".
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                    Here's a thought experiment.

                                    Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                    If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                    If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                    (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                    Giacinto BocciaG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Giacinto BocciaG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Giacinto Boccia
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @sjn
                                    Even it the real quality of the product/service was the same, it generally means that it is less interesting

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                      Here's a thought experiment.

                                      Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                      If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                      If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                      (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                      ReayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ReayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Reay
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @sjn @cstross I understand some publishers are now marking AI-made books with a mention/logo(?) inside the cover.

                                      Guess who’s got two thumbs and won’t be buying AI generated books.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                        Here's a thought experiment.

                                        Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                        If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                        If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                        (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                        Victor W AllenR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Victor W AllenR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Victor W Allen
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @sjn While my assumption is that AI products will be of lower quality in some (not always obvious) fashion, I think that would not be the reason to avoid such a product.

                                        Provenance matters! An exquisitely cut gemstone with a "blood diamond" tag on it just isn't as appealing as its quality would suggest

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Salve J. NilsenS Salve J. Nilsen

                                          Here's a thought experiment.

                                          Imagine a stamp mark with the words "Made with #AI" on it.

                                          If you see this mark on a picture, illustration, mobile app, song, movie, or story - do you get the notion that this product is of higher, lower or unchanged quality?

                                          If you see two identical products for the same price, where one has an AI mark and the other doesn't - which one would you buy?

                                          (Please retoot this #LLM #poll for wider reach)

                                          Cruiser 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇬🇱🇨🇦🇲🇽C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Cruiser 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇬🇱🇨🇦🇲🇽C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Cruiser 🇪🇺🇺🇦🇬🇱🇨🇦🇲🇽
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          @sjn you omitted the option 'completely useless if not for propaganda' here, sorry

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post