Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. RPGMemes
  3. Wings

Wings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved RPGMemes
rpgmemes
50 Posts 33 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S stingpie@lemmy.world

    I thought about that, but I don’t think that makes sense in this situation. The wings and arms must use different muscle groups, and the biceps would be used for the arms, not the wings. Furthermore, since the wings are on the back of Pit, the muscles would either have to wrap around the rib cage or go through them, constricting the lungs.

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    tyler@programming.dev
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    I’m not sure what your comments about the arms have to do with anything. Your sternum is on your chest, wings on your back, I’m not understanding why you’re talking about arms.

    In regards to muscles having to wrap around the rib cage, that’s exactly how birds wing muscles work.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • L Lemminary

      I used to own birds growing up, and I’ve felt the obvious drag of feathers on fabric. Forgive me for not letting go of the vivid memory I have.

      StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
      StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
      Stamets
      wrote on last edited by stamets@lemmy.world
      #41

      Again, fictional character from a fictional race. Feel like comparing them to birds is just weirdly pedantic. You’re not the only one here doing it. I just legitimately don’t get it

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • StametsS Stamets

        Again, fictional character from a fictional race. Feel like comparing them to birds is just weirdly pedantic. You’re not the only one here doing it. I just legitimately don’t get it

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        Lemminary
        wrote on last edited by lemminary@lemmy.world
        #42

        What are you on about? The archetypal angel wings are distinctly made of adult bird feathers, so it’s natural to assume that these are too without indication of it being otherwise. Or what, are generic centaur bottom halves not meant to be hairy even though they’re archetypically based on horses? Of course I would expect distinctly coarse hair if I were to touch them because I have touched horses before.

        And what’s more, out of context, this graphic makes no special case of commenting on a character specifically but rather its main point is about the logistics of putting on and taking off a wife beater with a pair of wings attached to your back. And somehow you’re griping about people following the logic in the comments? If you’re so dead-set about it being about the specific character, then why did you cut out the context in the first place?

        Or what, am I supposed to be familiar with every single winged character out there that ever existed to know their particular details about their wings? I’m clearly going off on derivative works of the most generic ancient Greek mythology that was based on real life animals.

        Weirdly pedantic my ass, this is some basic reasoning based on personal life experience. Rather, how weirdly controlling of you instead to not even allow for related comments to exist in their own space.

        StametsS 1 Reply Last reply
        12
        • L Lemminary

          What are you on about? The archetypal angel wings are distinctly made of adult bird feathers, so it’s natural to assume that these are too without indication of it being otherwise. Or what, are generic centaur bottom halves not meant to be hairy even though they’re archetypically based on horses? Of course I would expect distinctly coarse hair if I were to touch them because I have touched horses before.

          And what’s more, out of context, this graphic makes no special case of commenting on a character specifically but rather its main point is about the logistics of putting on and taking off a wife beater with a pair of wings attached to your back. And somehow you’re griping about people following the logic in the comments? If you’re so dead-set about it being about the specific character, then why did you cut out the context in the first place?

          Or what, am I supposed to be familiar with every single winged character out there that ever existed to know their particular details about their wings? I’m clearly going off on derivative works of the most generic ancient Greek mythology that was based on real life animals.

          Weirdly pedantic my ass, this is some basic reasoning based on personal life experience. Rather, how weirdly controlling of you instead to not even allow for related comments to exist in their own space.

          StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
          StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
          Stamets
          wrote on last edited by stamets@lemmy.world
          #43

          I feel like it’s a bit pointless

          I just legitimately don’t get it.

          I’ll take your point under advisement, and I do see it, but I don’t want to continue this conversation. Thank you though for elaborating though. I do, however, still stand by the fact that it is a fictional magical being and applying real world feathers of birds to this doesn’t make sense. To a bird? Yes. To a creature that does not exist and has had wings described in a variety of ways? No. At that point I do feel like it is completely pedantic to try and nail a specific explanation of how something cannot work to something that doesn’t exist and has had numerous iterations.

          But I wasn’t being antagonistic, I’m sorry if it came off that way, but I’ve got my own personal hell going on and I’m not in the mood to deal with this level of unnecessary hostility over a set of fictional wings. Have a good day.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • StametsS Stamets

            I feel like it’s a bit pointless

            I just legitimately don’t get it.

            I’ll take your point under advisement, and I do see it, but I don’t want to continue this conversation. Thank you though for elaborating though. I do, however, still stand by the fact that it is a fictional magical being and applying real world feathers of birds to this doesn’t make sense. To a bird? Yes. To a creature that does not exist and has had wings described in a variety of ways? No. At that point I do feel like it is completely pedantic to try and nail a specific explanation of how something cannot work to something that doesn’t exist and has had numerous iterations.

            But I wasn’t being antagonistic, I’m sorry if it came off that way, but I’ve got my own personal hell going on and I’m not in the mood to deal with this level of unnecessary hostility over a set of fictional wings. Have a good day.

            L This user is from outside of this forum
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            Lemminary
            wrote on last edited by
            #44

            I wasn’t being antagonistic

            Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience? How else do you expect me to respond to that? Lol

            StametsS 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • StametsS Stamets
              This post did not contain any content.
              Link Preview Image
              V This user is from outside of this forum
              V This user is from outside of this forum
              vxcvbzn@ttrpg.network
              wrote on last edited by
              #45

              My character circumnavigates the issue by snipping the shoulders of his tank top open, sliding it on from the legs, and then reattaching the shoulders with mending.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • J jankatarch@lemmy.world

                There is a haibane renmei reference here somewhere

                starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                starman2112@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                wrote on last edited by starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                #46

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lemminary

                  I wasn’t being antagonistic

                  Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience? How else do you expect me to respond to that? Lol

                  StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                  StametsS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Stamets
                  wrote on last edited by stamets@lemmy.world
                  #47

                  Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience?

                  I didn’t.

                  Feel like comparing them to birds is just weirdly pedantic.

                  I said that applying the logic of a birds wings to a non-existent magical creature taking off a shirt and dismissing it out of hand entirely based off of that singular comparison alone is weirdly pedantic. I never said you were.

                  You’re just looking for a fight at this point and I’ve got no interest in it. Just blocking you and moving on. Have a good day.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • StametsS Stamets

                    Then don’t call people weirdly pedantic when they’ve explained it was based on personal experience?

                    I didn’t.

                    Feel like comparing them to birds is just weirdly pedantic.

                    I said that applying the logic of a birds wings to a non-existent magical creature taking off a shirt and dismissing it out of hand entirely based off of that singular comparison alone is weirdly pedantic. I never said you were.

                    You’re just looking for a fight at this point and I’ve got no interest in it. Just blocking you and moving on. Have a good day.

                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                    Lemminary
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #48

                    My point is, why call people pedantic when that’s clearly not the case? Do you need a dictionary? Nobody was looking for a fight, but you clearly missed the point and pressed on. Now you’re vilifying people for explaining their thought process like a perpetual victim.

                    But thank you for blocking. Honestly, I don’t need to read your stupid comments or your posts in the first place.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • StametsS Stamets
                      This post did not contain any content.
                      Link Preview Image
                      thefuzzyfurrycomrade@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thefuzzyfurrycomrade@pawb.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                      thefuzzyfurrycomrade@pawb.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #49

                      Original:

                      Source (Tumblr), alternate frontend.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • B bastion@feddit.nl

                        Anyone who has wings (particularly if you have… ehhem. adult-sized wings) knows this is impractical, and it’s way better to just use snaps or buttons.

                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        I This user is from outside of this forum
                        Iron Lynx
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #50

                        I would guess that a culture built by &/or for winged people would have more strapless stuff. Or from the chest over the shoulders and tied up behind the neck. Or otherwise designed to not interfere and/or interact with the wings.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post