How many of you would watch this?
-
-
Porn
Edit: people think porn could be improved by adding Muppets?
You think it wouldn’t? I’m not saying it’s be more arousing, but it damn sure would improve it.
-
There’s a stage play called Avenue Q
Naughty puppets star in ACTORS next show, the R-rated 'Avenue Q'
It's not your kids' Sesame Street show. The puppets in "Avenue Q" have a musical meant for adults and ACTORS in Ames is staging it for 3 weekends.
The Ames Tribune (www.amestrib.com)
I saw it on Broadway during its early run. That’s not porn.
-
You think it wouldn’t? I’m not saying it’s be more arousing, but it damn sure would improve it.
Muppets are a Jim Henson studio IP built around childish imagery. I want nothing childish associated with my porn other than childish bad jokes and the XXX Alice in Wonderland musical which isn’t a bad musical movie though the porn parts are quite bad.
-
I saw it on Broadway during its early run. That’s not porn.
It does have Muppet sex though.
-
It does have Muppet sex though.
No, it has puppet sex. Muppets are very specifically the IP of Henson studios and that style of puppet I associate with childhood way to much for Muppets in porn to be remotely acceptable. It would be like putting Teletubbies into porn
-
This already exists but the other way around and the Muppets are The Rock and Jack Black.
-
No, it has puppet sex. Muppets are very specifically the IP of Henson studios and that style of puppet I associate with childhood way to much for Muppets in porn to be remotely acceptable. It would be like putting Teletubbies into porn
I fear you are vastly underestimating the horror of the collective hive mind of the internet and what people are capable of… Nothing is sacred. Rule 34 exists for a reason, its a warning to not dig too deep. (DO NOT GOOGLE THAT, It states that if something exists there is porn of it, and there are sites with its namesake that endevor to catalog it…)
-
It wouldn’t be GOOD, but it’d take a bit of the edge off.
“If you ask me, that headless fella’s actually the lucky one.”
“Why do you say that?”
“He doesn’t have to watch the rest of this show!”
OHOHOHHOHHHOHOHOHOO!
-
Good lord this is brilliant !
-
I fear you are vastly underestimating the horror of the collective hive mind of the internet and what people are capable of… Nothing is sacred. Rule 34 exists for a reason, its a warning to not dig too deep. (DO NOT GOOGLE THAT, It states that if something exists there is porn of it, and there are sites with its namesake that endevor to catalog it…)
I know that it has been made the question was what would not be improved by adding Muppets? My answer is that porn is better without Muppets than with
-
“If you ask me, that headless fella’s actually the lucky one.”
“Why do you say that?”
“He doesn’t have to watch the rest of this show!”
OHOHOHHOHHHOHOHOHOO!
I’m sold on this.
-
Porn
Edit: people think porn could be improved by adding Muppets?
Unfamiliar with Peter Jackson’s pre LOTR work?
-
Porn
Edit: people think porn could be improved by adding Muppets?
Oh how quickly history forgets the horrors of the past…
-
Holy fuck this is GOLD!
-
I for sure would. Ryan Reynolds as a Bard being played by Gonzo.
Omfg yessss!
-
I for sure would. Ryan Reynolds as a Bard being played by Gonzo.
Gonzo is DM.
Fozzie = wise cracking Bard
Miss Piggy = Half-Oink Barbarian
Kermit = Elven Ranger
Animal = Wild magic Sorcerer
RolfSam the Eagle = paladinRolf = Druid
Dr. Teeth: BBEG, trying to rule the realm with Electric Mayhem
-
ok but hear me out.
this but the muppet babies.
-
Gonzo is DM.
Fozzie = wise cracking Bard
Miss Piggy = Half-Oink Barbarian
Kermit = Elven Ranger
Animal = Wild magic Sorcerer
RolfSam the Eagle = paladinRolf = Druid
Dr. Teeth: BBEG, trying to rule the realm with Electric Mayhem
I like Rolf, but i think Sam the Eagle would be better a better choice as an uptight paladin.
-
I could have swore this was an actual episode.
