The reason no one says “Super Bowl” has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the massive amount of resources of the NFL.
-
The reason no one says “Super Bowl” has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the massive amount of resources of the NFL. But its scare tactics don’t change the fact that you can totally say “SuperBowl.” https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/you-can-call-super-bowl-super-bowl
-
The reason no one says “Super Bowl” has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the massive amount of resources of the NFL. But its scare tactics don’t change the fact that you can totally say “SuperBowl.” https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/you-can-call-super-bowl-super-bowl
@eff I mean, I usually say Superb Owl as a piss take as someone who cares very little about sports and cares even less about american football
-
The reason no one says “Super Bowl” has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the massive amount of resources of the NFL. But its scare tactics don’t change the fact that you can totally say “SuperBowl.” https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/you-can-call-super-bowl-super-bowl
@eff How about the Olympics as an encumbered term? Or must we say "The Games of the XXV Winter Olympiad" ?
-
The reason no one says “Super Bowl” has nothing to do with the law and everything to do with the massive amount of resources of the NFL. But its scare tactics don’t change the fact that you can totally say “SuperBowl.” https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/you-can-call-super-bowl-super-bowl
@eff
Along similar lines, you *should* be able to say "Dungeons & Dragons" when identifying products compatible with D&D, but TSR (the original owners) came down hard on people back in the day for daring to release D&D-compatible stuff they didn't control. Third-party publishers were generally way, way too small and poor to be able to afford to fight a completely winnable legal battle, and people who shared "netbooks" or character sheets online were even less capable.1/3