Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Conservatives Speak Out In Support Of Convoy Organizers

Conservatives Speak Out In Support Of Convoy Organizers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
77 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J jason2357@lemmy.ca

    Unfortunately, I’ve run into a lot of very average people who think the convoy was what “ended covid lockdowns”. They know it messed up Ottawa for a while, and feel bad about that, but are “happy with the end result.” The vast majority havn’t ever listened to those racist rants by the organizers, read their manifesto stuff, or read the journalism investigating their funding sources. Mainstream media never covered any of that in detail -probably because of how distasteful it was. They remember messy street protests, annoyed residents, and lockdowns ending. That’s it.

    squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    squid64@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    squid64@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    I understand why those people were unhappy about all the covid restrictions but yeah I know that the organizers were racist and that makes the whole thing questionable at best.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

      I agree, we were working with the info at the time. But thats what was so frustrating about the continuation of the mandates when it was clear that we were past the peak of infections and the gov STILL wanted to impose NEW restrictions. I think Canadians were pretty patient for two long years but there was no reason to keep pushing us past the point of reason.

      And even if Trudeau’s rationale was that he wanted to push people to get vaccinated, the name calling and the derision for those who didnt want to was completely uncalled for. The FIRST job of a PM is to keep Canadians united and feeling supported not treated like they were bad guys. That was a jerk move on his part.

      But yes, lesson learned. Unfortunately the ‘lesson’ here in Alberta seems to be 'you cant make us take a vaccine we dont want which is why we have a crazy high measles outbreak. Yikes. Thats embarrassing.

      FlareHeartF This user is from outside of this forum
      FlareHeartF This user is from outside of this forum
      FlareHeart
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      Ya, yikes indeed. Measles is no joke. It can also cause immune amnesia, which is terrifying too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

        No, telling someone they will lose their job if they dont get vaccinated is not ‘forcing’. Its more like ‘gentle persuasion’ right?

        Of course people were forced. There are quite a few cases in Canada where people were laid off or fined who subsequently got their jobs back after the lunacy was over and they won their case in court. The Democracy Fund has been fighting these cases all over Canada.

        One example: https://www.ccpartners.ca/blog/details/the-employers-edge/2023/03/23/arbitrator-reinstates-employee-dismissed-for-just-cause-for-not-providing-proof-of-vaccination

        Another: https://www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/article/former-westjet-employee-awarded-65k-for-wrongful-dismissal-over-covid-19-vaccination/

        And $300,000 in fines for Amish people and liens on their property is not “forced”??: https://www.thedemocracyfund.ca/amish_community_overcomes_financial_barriers

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        if you don’t want to participate in society, then don’t.

        if you want to, then play by the rules the majority agrees on. there are plenty of rules I don’t agree with but follow anyways because that’s the social contract

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T teppa

          These people can’t understand there could be differing viewpoints to their own, whether they agree with them or not.

          Libertarians are basically Nazis in their eyes as ironic as that sounds.

          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          greyeyedghost@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          Libertarians, in general, want to reap the benefits of society without paying the costs. I don’t imagine Amazon would have grown to the size it did if there weren’t ports for the ships to dock in, roads for the trucks to drive on, an internet to advertise on, and all the rest of it, yet they feel beset upon for being asked to pay the taxes that help provide all those things.

          Anti-vaxer truckers are the same, but writ small and in human form.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • Sunshine (she/her)S Sunshine (she/her)
            This post did not contain any content.
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            Not sure where I stand on the vaccine thing.

            I fully support science and think vaccines should be mandatory, especially during a global pandemic that we haven’t seen in a hundred years. Or, for example, measle vaccines before exposing yourself to others during a measles outbreak.

            I’m also for body autonomy with abortion and what medical care and what vaccines you receive.

            It cuts both ways.

            In the end I think the failing here is education. Not enforcement. IMO most reasonable people would take the vaccine. The only reason reasonable people don’t is because they do not trust government or science, due to lack of education or understanding.

            S N 2 Replies Last reply
            4
            • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

              Not sure where I stand on the vaccine thing.

              I fully support science and think vaccines should be mandatory, especially during a global pandemic that we haven’t seen in a hundred years. Or, for example, measle vaccines before exposing yourself to others during a measles outbreak.

              I’m also for body autonomy with abortion and what medical care and what vaccines you receive.

              It cuts both ways.

              In the end I think the failing here is education. Not enforcement. IMO most reasonable people would take the vaccine. The only reason reasonable people don’t is because they do not trust government or science, due to lack of education or understanding.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              soup@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              You know what the word “mandatory” means, right? In this one comment you say you’re for mandatory vaccines in exactly the scenario that the convoy morons were whining about but also go off about bodily autonomy. Yes, education is important but also we have regulations and laws because unfortunately we don’t live in a fairy land where everyone behaves themselves and considers the well-being of their fellow person.

              It doesn’t cut both ways equally, not by a long shot.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              13
              • S soup@lemmy.world

                You know what the word “mandatory” means, right? In this one comment you say you’re for mandatory vaccines in exactly the scenario that the convoy morons were whining about but also go off about bodily autonomy. Yes, education is important but also we have regulations and laws because unfortunately we don’t live in a fairy land where everyone behaves themselves and considers the well-being of their fellow person.

                It doesn’t cut both ways equally, not by a long shot.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

                Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

                These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

                B A S B B 5 Replies Last reply
                1
                • squid64@lemmy.caS squid64@lemmy.ca

                  I understand why those people were unhappy about all the covid restrictions but yeah I know that the organizers were racist and that makes the whole thing questionable at best.

                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  J This user is from outside of this forum
                  jason2357@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  I feel the need to clear the point that the lockdown/restrictions were provincial, and set to expire during those 2 weeks long before the protest was even organized. The public opinion had already turned, and there was no appetite for further restrictions at that point. They cannot take credit for “ending the lockdowns” but unfortunately, the timing and limited awareness make it seem so.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                    I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

                    Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

                    These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    someone’s abort doesn’t kill a strangers kids or grand parents. Come on use your brain or stop being disingenuous.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • O orteilgenou@lemmy.world

                      The wholesale adoption of pandemic rules was really wearing thin by the time the convoy took place. When Trudeau gave the interview where he called them racist and other things it really felt tone deaf to me. I know I’m not alone in neither welcoming them nor pretending I didn’t understand their frustration. I was not a fan of their tactics but I mean only in Ottawa could a protest pit truckers loudly partying on Parliament Hill against residents who were mostly complaining about the noise.

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      They had nazi flags. Use your brain.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      8
                      • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                        for stupid decisions that endanger others.

                        Sure. But there are plenty of reasons people had for refusing the vaccine that arent stupid at all. Including my cousin who is a pediatric ICU nurse and VERY well acquainted with vaccines and how they work. She was required to take the SARS vaccine and it physically damaged her immediately, and she now has heart complications that started right after she took her shot. So when the health board said she needed to take the Covid shot she pleaded her case as her heart couldnt take more damage if it were to have the same effect. They refused to grant her an exception so she retired from nursing instead. Not sure what part of that is ‘stupid’ but there wasnt exactly a lot of understanding - Trudeau made sure the message was that anyone who didnt take the shot was ‘unCanadian’ and most likely misogynists and racists and dont believe in science. Which was actually a pretty asshole thing to say. And why he’s not only no longer PM but he’s completely disappeared off the radar because the Liberal party doesnt want to remind Canadians of his existence.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #38

                        So, she shouldn’t be working in that field. Her job is to care for others NOT get a nice retirement. Man nurse streo types real.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • B beejboytyson@lemmy.world

                          So, she shouldn’t be working in that field. Her job is to care for others NOT get a nice retirement. Man nurse streo types real.

                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #39

                          Lol. She did it exceptionally well for 30 years and there are many children alive today because of her care and YOU’RE going to pass judgement on her? LOL. Oh please.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • GreatBlueHeronG GreatBlueHeron

                            So, we’re on a boat. It starts leaking with these mysterious finger sized holes. Most people start sticking fingers in holes to stop the water, but there are a bunch of people that are worried their finger might get stuck, or a fish might come and bite it or divine intervention will save the boat - and they decide not to stick their finger in a hole, and just for good measure some of the people that won’t stick their finger in a hole go and make a few new holes. You think that’s ok? For a bunch of people to, not only not contribute to saving everyone, but actually make the situation worse? And for there to be no consequences??

                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            L This user is from outside of this forum
                            lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                            #40

                            You’re completely missing context.

                            At the point of the convoy, about 85% of Canadians were already vaccinated. Thats plenty for ‘herd immunity’ But the government was STILL pushing, after two solid years of vaccinations and people being isolated for even MORE measures to force people to get vaccinated. And the cracks were already beginning to show - kids were losing out on a significant amount of their education, old people in homes were suffering deep depression from not seeing family, businesses were closing and people were losing their life’s work because they had no customers, mental health issues were skyrocketing and hospitals couldnt keep up with the patient intake, drug use went from bad to epidemic levels and still is epidemic level, family relationships were not only strained but a lot of people ended relationships with friends and family over the vaccination issue. And into this hell, Trudeau comes up with the bright idea to try and force cross border truckers to get vaccinated when they barely ever left their truck cabs and interacted with almost no one in their daily duties. Even Trudeau said “over 90% of truckers are vaccinated”. Fine. Good enough, leave the rest alone.

                            You make it sound like those opposed to vaccines were the majority. No there were a minority who had reasons not to get it whether you agree with their reasons or not. And we should’ve been just fine with that, because they were a small minority. But instead of just leaving them alone MANY people vilified them as evil people and bad Canadians. They weren’t.

                            I STRONGLY prefer a few people who chose to do what they felt was right for them and their families to a government that says you WILL do what we say, WHEN we tell you to do it and you will NOT object or we will make sure you suffer consequences including losing your job and your means to make a living AND we will seize your money for protesting what we tell you. Like, what the fuck Trudeau, back the hell up!! Who made you KING?! This is Canada, not communist China. He WAY overstepped his authority and thank god he paid for it with HIS job - the truckers are just fine.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • N njm1314@lemmy.world

                              Well if that choice is so bad for you then maybe don’t make it. That’s how choices work. I can choose to inject myself with bleach right now, I’d probably die, so I’m not going to make that choice. No one’s forcing me not to make that choice no one can stop me. That’s called consequence. It is beyond childish to think you should never face consequences for your choices. That’s not the same as being forced.

                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              L This user is from outside of this forum
                              lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                              #41

                              If you are given options its a choice like ‘hey we value your THIRTY YEARS of service so you can work on a different unit for now, or you can take an unpaid leave, or you can do administrative work at home til the epidemic subsides’ THAT would be a choice.

                              If its ‘You have to get the vaccine or we’ll fire you’, thats not a consequence, thats force’ She was most definitely FORCED to resign.

                              N 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L lovecanada@lemmy.ca

                                Lol. She did it exceptionally well for 30 years and there are many children alive today because of her care and YOU’RE going to pass judgement on her? LOL. Oh please.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                beejboytyson@lemmy.world
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #42

                                It was her job which she refuses to protect others. Sorry you don’t get points for doing your job.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                5
                                • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                                  I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

                                  Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

                                  These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #43

                                  The only one in there you listed that doesn’t affect only the person making the decision is vaccines. The classic quote is something like “Your freedom to swing your fist ends at someone’s face.”

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                                    I somewhat agree. But how do you make laws for forcing people to get vaccines, yet let them choose to have abortions, or refuse medical care, or eat garbage food, drink alcohol etc, for example?

                                    Like, how would you define that on a societal level, and also have exceptions for situations the law doesnt account for?

                                    These things dont exactly equate, but I can see why being forced by the government to get a vaccines irks some people. I think it all stems from them thinking that vaccines harm you, or cause autism or whatever. That and that we haven’t had a truly deadly pandemic or disease going around in living memory (thanks again to science and our predecessors getting vaccinated) that would cause people to prefer the vaccine over say polio. People are losing fath in institutions and we are not educating our children with critical thinking enough.

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    soup@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #44

                                    The other comments put it well in saying that vaccines affect other people. Though, oddly enough, we do need better laws regarding what food can be sold as far as that one goes because companies making sugar-filled, addictive food very much on purpose is an action they take for personal gain that relies on hurting others.

                                    For sure people are losing faith in institutions, and that is largely because of the critical thinking issues you mentioned and also the fact that we can’t help ourselves but elect at least a few untrustworthy people into office. The people who attended the convoy were largely Conservative voters and if they have a problem with the government they’re only going to make it that much worse by putting the scummiest people you know into positions of power.

                                    These also aren’t really problems if you think about them or look to places that have already worked them out.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • S slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca

                                      Not sure where I stand on the vaccine thing.

                                      I fully support science and think vaccines should be mandatory, especially during a global pandemic that we haven’t seen in a hundred years. Or, for example, measle vaccines before exposing yourself to others during a measles outbreak.

                                      I’m also for body autonomy with abortion and what medical care and what vaccines you receive.

                                      It cuts both ways.

                                      In the end I think the failing here is education. Not enforcement. IMO most reasonable people would take the vaccine. The only reason reasonable people don’t is because they do not trust government or science, due to lack of education or understanding.

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      non_burglar@lemmy.world
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #45

                                      You really just needed to think an extra 10 minutes before writing this down.

                                      It doesn’t “cut both ways” those are two separate issues: personal health and public health.

                                      If you think seat belts, fluoride in water, warning labels on poison bottles, bittrex in antifreeze are being foisted upon your personal choices, then you need to reconsider that there are other people than you in the world.

                                      It’s not that complicated: get vaccinated so you and others are less likely to die when disease rolls around.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      11
                                      • B beejboytyson@lemmy.world

                                        someone’s abort doesn’t kill a strangers kids or grand parents. Come on use your brain or stop being disingenuous.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #46

                                        I agree with you, but that is not THEIR perspective. Many of them believe abortion IS murder.

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S soup@lemmy.world

                                          The other comments put it well in saying that vaccines affect other people. Though, oddly enough, we do need better laws regarding what food can be sold as far as that one goes because companies making sugar-filled, addictive food very much on purpose is an action they take for personal gain that relies on hurting others.

                                          For sure people are losing faith in institutions, and that is largely because of the critical thinking issues you mentioned and also the fact that we can’t help ourselves but elect at least a few untrustworthy people into office. The people who attended the convoy were largely Conservative voters and if they have a problem with the government they’re only going to make it that much worse by putting the scummiest people you know into positions of power.

                                          These also aren’t really problems if you think about them or look to places that have already worked them out.

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by slykethephoxenix@lemmy.ca
                                          #47

                                          I agree. I’m from Australia, and vaccinations are mandatory and required, like you will be ordered by a court, and have your children removed if they are not vaccinated type of thing. I agree with this law.

                                          I think people downvoting here are not understanding what I’m saying, or I didn’t explain it well enough. I’m not saying anti vaxxers are right. I am saying they have some merit with their arguments, but ultimately they only think these ideas due to lack of education and critical thinking.

                                          P S 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post