@cmconseils I've seen research and convincing commentary/analysis that says this is what drives many rich people's most antisocial richperson behavior.
When do you stop worrying? When you have a middle-class income and some hope of retirement? When your retirement is enough for you to stay middle-class? When your children, if any, have ample college funds? When you have enough to deal with a tree falling on your house? A full-house robbery? The death of a loved one? A long-term disability that takes you or other loved ones out of the workforce for years? A kidnapping and ransom situation (increasingly likely the more money you have)? A cancer diagnosis? Multiple loved ones with cancer diagnoses? The collapse of the real estate market? A stock market crash taking your 401(k) with it? The collapse of the US or global economy?
The terms "enough" and "secure" aren't binary; there's no clear point at which they happen. I suspect even Bezos partly wants more money to hedge against certain low-probability but awful catastrophes. Rich people are driven by their situations just like everyone else.
This isn't to say we should stop holding people accountable for behavior--we don't have a legal/moral framework for anything else. Maybe the answer is what people have been saying for generations: stronger socialized, collective protections against the things we worry about, so there's less temptation to follow the "I need more money because I'm still not protected against some dangers" path.
And aggressively tax high wealth at the same time.







