@xs4me2 @ben @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse And I am disagreeing with that. I'm saying they are not appropriate for this stuff, whoever uses them and regardless of how they use them.
L
lproven@social.vivaldi.net
@lproven@social.vivaldi.net
Posts
-
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days. -
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days.@ben @xs4me2 @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse No, that is not what I am suggesting at all.
You are trying to interpret my position on this through the lens of what *you* think they are good for.
-
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days.@phil @xs4me2 @reading_recluse My current favourite paper on this:
When ChatGPT summarises, it actually does nothing of the kind.
One of the use cases I thought was reasonable to expect from ChatGPT and Friends (LLMs) was summarising. It turns out I was wrong. What ChatGPT isn't summarising at all, it only looks like it. What it does is something else and that something else only becomes summarising in very specific circumstances.
R&A IT Strategy & Architecture (ea.rna.nl)
-
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days.@xs4me2 @dynamite_ready @reading_recluse But it can't be used for brain surgery.
No, this is not a skills issue. It is based on profound misunderstanding. No they are not good search tools. No they are not good for research or learning, because they work only and entirely by *making stuff up* and if you're learning then you're not an expert and you can't tell true from false.
-
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days.> can be useful to digest and explore information at great speed
Nope. Still wrong. This is in fact something they are extremely and *dangerously* bad at.
-
The LLM discourse on the Fediverse has really irked me the last few days.
