Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Canada finally reveals the results of its universal basic income experiment

Canada finally reveals the results of its universal basic income experiment

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
177 Posts 72 Posters 120 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CanadaRocks

    You’re looking at one tax. If you look at ALL Canadian taxes, income tax, provincial taxes, sales tax, import taxes, fuel taxes, property taxes, health services taxes, business taxes Canadians actually pay about HALF of their gross income in taxes. We are f’n taxed to death in Canada.

    kingporkchop@lemmy.caK This user is from outside of this forum
    kingporkchop@lemmy.caK This user is from outside of this forum
    kingporkchop@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #105

    We are f’n taxed to death in Canada.

    Bullshit

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    11
    • C CanadaRocks

      These studies are annoying. “Study finds if you give people money they do better in life” Wow. Such rocket science.
      But for all the radical socialists trying push UBI, you will note that NONE of them want to pay for it with their tax increases (do they even pay taxes?). Which is the entire problem. There may be some savings in the system but the COST will be borne up front by the taxpaayer. And since WHEN in the history of mankind, if a gov has saved some money in other areas, have they LOWERED taxes due to the savings? Never.

      Therefore UBI is sever going to happen. Because the only people who support it are students and academics and think tanks. The rest of us live in reality and are sick of our very high tax burden in Canada. So enough with the studies, kill this idea once and for all.

      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      wrote on last edited by gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      #106

      UBI helps the people and not the billionaires. I don’t see why you’re siding with the billionaires.

      So enough with this babbling, kill this bullshit once and for all.

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • C CanadaRocks

        Who said anything about ‘fuck you I got mine?’

        First of all Canada already has a TON of social supports for anyone who is in need. We have Employment Insurance if you lose your job. We have Old Age Security and Canada Pension Plan for seniors. We have Child Tax Credits for parents and especially single parents. We have the GST credit to give back taxes to low income earners. We have the Canada Workers Benefit. We have the Canada Disability Benefit. We have the Assured Income for Severely Handicapped. We have disability pensions. We have Universal Pharmacare for prescription drugs. We have housing benefits/social housing programs. We have the Canadian Dental Benefit. We have student aid. There are free food banks in every city. And there are emergency funds available for things like rent/damage deposits on an emergency basis from every province through various community agencies, charities, and non-profit organizations.

        So WHY do we need UBI on top of all that? If you need help in Canada, you CAN find it. Its already here.

        Source: I founded a charity for street kids in one of our major cities thats been operating for 33 years. There is a TON of support out there. The fact is that a LOT of the people on the street know how to use and abuse the system and they dont WANT to get out of it because its what they grew up in and what they are accustomed to. I speak from years of experience.

        A This user is from outside of this forum
        A This user is from outside of this forum
        agent_nycto@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #107

        It boggles my mind how some people would fight against getting money each month.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

          The US spends $880 billion on military spending in 2023. That’s 20% of its annual budget. Source

          The US has roughly 350 million inhabitants. Divide that and get that you could give $2.5K annually to each person as handouts. And we’re not even talking about tax reforms here.

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          arkouda@lemmy.ca
          wrote on last edited by
          #108

          The US spends $880 billion on military spending in 2023. That’s 20% of its annual budget. Source

          The US has roughly 350 million inhabitants. Divide that and get that you could give $2.5K annually to each person as handouts. And we’re not even talking about tax reforms here.

          Three points.

          1. This is about Canada.

          2. From my earlier post: “UBI isn’t the best solution out there, it is a highly polarized idea, and funding for a program on scale would cost Billions, requiring trillions in revenue to be a viable option.”

          3. You just paid for 1 month of UBI cutting the entire military budget for a year, which took 20% of the annual budget, leaving another 4 months of payment before the country has no budget left.

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

            mind doing that napkin math?

            I did a while ago and i found that if an annual wealth tax rate of 3% on wealth above $10 million is implemented, then it would be enough to give all americans a monthly handout of $300, and that was by rather conservative estimates. It might be higher.

            A This user is from outside of this forum
            A This user is from outside of this forum
            arkouda@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #109

            I did it above if you are interested.

            Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

            gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

              I did it above if you are interested.

              Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

              gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
              gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
              gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
              wrote on last edited by
              #110

              Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

              It’s a start. We’ll see how things develop in the future. A first step needs to be made.

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • L lefantome@programming.dev

                Many middle class Canadian pay 25% or more just in income tax. Then you have to add sales taxes, property taxes, and the rest.

                I would say he is about right.

                The top income tax bracket is over 50%. If you are very high income, you can pay well over 30% just in income tax (overall).

                For anybody that does not understand progressive income tax brackets, a top rate of 50% does not mean you pay 50% on all income. You pay nothing to a certain point, pay a lower percentage up to a certain level, and then it goes up on what you make beyond that level. On the 30,000th dollar you make, you might pay 25 cents tax. On the 200,000th dollar, you might pay 53 cents. On your first dollar, you pay nothing.

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                figjam@midwest.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #111

                Oh no! Won’t someone think about the highest earners! #clutchpearls

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

                  Do you believe $300 a month is sufficient for survival using the core idea of UBI?

                  It’s a start. We’ll see how things develop in the future. A first step needs to be made.

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  arkouda@lemmy.ca
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #112

                  You are also okay with those payments going to the ultra wealthy using the core idea of UBI?

                  gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

                    UBI would also be good for the economy, as it stimulates consumerism. To economists, CEOs and politicians, you have to talk about the positive effects on the economy.

                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                    endlessnightmare@reddthat.com
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #113

                    Indeed, it isn’t like the money paid out for UBI just goes into a black hole. Sure, some will save it. But many will spend it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

                      You are also okay with those payments going to the ultra wealthy using the core idea of UBI?

                      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #114

                      yes, why not?

                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • D dancesongraves@lemmy.ca

                        We’re not quite there yet. Even with offsets by eliminating virtually all other social programs, including socialized healthcare, and slashing the size of military expenditures to almost nothing, doing every single good idea there is to fund it and increasing taxation on the owner class, there simply isn’t enought GDP to support it without spending your way into inflation… not unless you’re a country with a very small population rich in natural resources.

                        It’s plausible if we can bring the price of energy down to the point that it’s negligible and multiplies productivity almost for free.

                        We need scalable commercial fusion power to make it work, basically.

                        I agree with the goal,l. I don’t think people will contribute less without the threat of being unable to meet basic costs of living. I think a lot of people’s contributions to society aren’t adequately captured and recorded by our economic system.

                        But I’m not naive enough to believe that it can meet all of a person’s cost of living with current tech.

                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                        Log in | Sign up
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #115

                        Tell me you don’t know how UBI works in design or in practice without telling me you haven’t learned much about it at all.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • S stray@pawb.social

                          Controlled rent is better than uncontrolled rent, but it suffers from the same problems as minimum wage. And why should landlords even exist? I’m not convinced private rentals should be legal at all. If you’re not using a property for personal use or a place of business, why shouldn’t it be seized and auctioned or rented publicly?

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          soup@lemmy.world
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #116

                          Rentals do have their place for people like students, and some businesses who regularly send employees to a city(rare but it happens). Rentals are not inherently bad, but the expectation that someone should rent as a longterm plan is completely fucked. We do not need this many many rental units in the world, not at all.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • A arkouda@lemmy.ca

                            The US spends $880 billion on military spending in 2023. That’s 20% of its annual budget. Source

                            The US has roughly 350 million inhabitants. Divide that and get that you could give $2.5K annually to each person as handouts. And we’re not even talking about tax reforms here.

                            Three points.

                            1. This is about Canada.

                            2. From my earlier post: “UBI isn’t the best solution out there, it is a highly polarized idea, and funding for a program on scale would cost Billions, requiring trillions in revenue to be a viable option.”

                            3. You just paid for 1 month of UBI cutting the entire military budget for a year, which took 20% of the annual budget, leaving another 4 months of payment before the country has no budget left.

                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            Log in | Sign up
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #117

                            You keep pretending all over this thread that you would be increasing the income of everyone. You’re ignoring completely that you change the tax system so that wealthy people pay more than at present so it’s not inventing money, it’s redistributing it. You also cancel a bunch of social security programs that it replaces.

                            Your sums are based on false assumptions and you’re just spreading your FUD which is itself based on ignorance and fear. Stop trying to sound like you know something about it when you keep multiplying the population by the payment as if that was relevant in isolation of everything else that’s part of UBI.

                            If you want to sound knowledgeable, first so the reading work of learning.

                            But I think you don’t want to learn you just want to criticise because you don’t like the idea of money going from rich to poor.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F fjdybank@lemmy.ca

                              Why don’t you stop and smell the roses?

                              Jumping to such a conclusion, then blaming the hypothetical reaction, displays ignorance or malice.

                              kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #118

                              I’m pretty sure they meant that “the result they want” (“UBI is bad”) would be peer reviewed and shown to be bunk, but the people who wanted that result will ignore the peer review results.

                              They weren’t disagreeing with the original comment, just adding to it.

                              F B 2 Replies Last reply
                              16
                              • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.deG gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de

                                yes, why not?

                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                A This user is from outside of this forum
                                arkouda@lemmy.ca
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #119

                                Because someone with Billions doesn’t need $300 a month that could go to funding social services for people who need them.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                  I’m pretty sure they meant that “the result they want” (“UBI is bad”) would be peer reviewed and shown to be bunk, but the people who wanted that result will ignore the peer review results.

                                  They weren’t disagreeing with the original comment, just adding to it.

                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                                  fjdybank@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #120

                                  If so, then my reaction was ignorant and I retract it 🙂

                                  B S 2 Replies Last reply
                                  6
                                  • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
                                    This post did not contain any content.
                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    J This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jsomae@lemmy.ml
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #121

                                    I would rather see socialized housing, food, and (better) medical coverage than UBI. UBI could (maybe) cause the prices of essentials like housing to increase.

                                    P 2 Replies Last reply
                                    10
                                    • mintiefreshM mintiefresh
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #122

                                      For every dollar a participant earns through employment they lose 50 cents from their basic income payment. This means the basic income proposal would only apply to individuals earning less than 34,000 CAD ($24,380) a year, or couples earning less than 48,000 CAD ($34,420).

                                      This is not UBI.

                                      UNIVERSAL basic income is UNIVERSAL: It doesn’t matter how much you earn.

                                      Oh, you pulled in a billion dollars last year? Here’s your check for $12,000. To save us postage, we’re including it in the same envelope as your $450,000,000 tax bill.

                                      The universality of the system is the single most important component. We convey to our government(s) our political authority. They use our political authority to provide essential services, such as roads and courts and rule of law. They charge the taxpayer for those services. UBI is how they compensate us, the shareholders of our government(s) for the use of the political authority we grant them.

                                      UBI is not a social program. It is not charity. It is the government finally paying out dividends to its citizen-shareholders.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      30
                                      • C CanadaRocks

                                        Who said anything about ‘fuck you I got mine?’

                                        First of all Canada already has a TON of social supports for anyone who is in need. We have Employment Insurance if you lose your job. We have Old Age Security and Canada Pension Plan for seniors. We have Child Tax Credits for parents and especially single parents. We have the GST credit to give back taxes to low income earners. We have the Canada Workers Benefit. We have the Canada Disability Benefit. We have the Assured Income for Severely Handicapped. We have disability pensions. We have Universal Pharmacare for prescription drugs. We have housing benefits/social housing programs. We have the Canadian Dental Benefit. We have student aid. There are free food banks in every city. And there are emergency funds available for things like rent/damage deposits on an emergency basis from every province through various community agencies, charities, and non-profit organizations.

                                        So WHY do we need UBI on top of all that? If you need help in Canada, you CAN find it. Its already here.

                                        Source: I founded a charity for street kids in one of our major cities thats been operating for 33 years. There is a TON of support out there. The fact is that a LOT of the people on the street know how to use and abuse the system and they dont WANT to get out of it because its what they grew up in and what they are accustomed to. I speak from years of experience.

                                        rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #123

                                        Democracy is the idea that government receives its power and authority from the general public, not a king, god, or other source. The government utilizes the political authority that we provide them to perform a wide variety of essential services to its taxpayer customers.

                                        We invest our political authority in the government. The political authority is what allows the government to provide and charge for those services. We are investors; shareholders. We are owed a return on our investment.

                                        UBI is the dividend owed to us for our investment.

                                        Those various charitable programs and services you described? Most of those would be replaced by UBI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • C cyborganism

                                          It’s a crime to not have universal basic income at this point. People aren’t only unable to afford basic living expenses, but they’re losing jobs to automation and AI already. What are these people supposed to do? Go beg on the streets?

                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lovecanada@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #124

                                          No, they’re supposed to adapt and overcome. Just like any other time in history when things are tougher. And if you think this is a tough time you havent studied our history well. The Dirty 30’s, the Great Depressions, the first and second World Wars, even the Cold War Era was much more difficult. This doesnt even compare.

                                          S I K 3 Replies Last reply
                                          1

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post