Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    Link Preview Image
    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

    favicon

    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

    The GafferT This user is from outside of this forum
    The GafferT This user is from outside of this forum
    The Gaffer
    wrote last edited by
    #87

    @sundogplanets Apropos of nothing, I recommend Becky Chambers’ SciFi book “The Galaxy, and the Ground Within”. A great read premised on the Kessler Effect.

    #SciFi #Satellites #StarLink #Space

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      Link Preview Image
      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

      favicon

      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

      Troed SångbergT This user is from outside of this forum
      Troed SångbergT This user is from outside of this forum
      Troed Sångberg
      wrote last edited by
      #88

      @sundogplanets I'd still like journalists to start asking questions when "data centers in space" come up. Questions like:

      -"How will you cool them?"

      I really can't imagine there's a whole business plan drawn up thinking "space is really cold" will solve it but I'm starting to doubt ...

      �U 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        Link Preview Image
        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

        favicon

        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

        PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
        PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
        Patrick
        wrote last edited by
        #89

        @sundogplanets, why is this a problem? Datacenters in space would eliminate a lot of problems like access to free solar energy, cooling, etc.

        For example, datacenters are being constructed with massive discounts by councils/municipals and in turn, water and electricity bill of residential area gets higher to pay that offset of costs.

        Sean FenianZ Comrade WeezW 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • GhostOnTheHalfShellG GhostOnTheHalfShell

          @sundogplanets

          If you understand anything about the giant CF of data centers right now this is just the stupidest idea ever.

          First, the lifespan of these chips runs on the order of 18 months before they are considered obsolete and the chips fry very quickly so there is a very high failure rate.

          Also, the data centers power is determined by the networking of all the components in the data center.

          Ask yourself if RF communication broadcast between satellites can work like wires

          Ian Douglas ScottI This user is from outside of this forum
          Ian Douglas ScottI This user is from outside of this forum
          Ian Douglas Scott
          wrote last edited by
          #90

          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Plus the big question of how you cool a GPU datacenter surrounded by the vacuum of space.

          But then, you probably don't really need to know anything about datacenters to realize that moving them into space is just going to make every aspect of them more difficult and expensive...

          Michael GemarM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            Link Preview Image
            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

            favicon

            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

            Heather MigliorisiH This user is from outside of this forum
            Heather MigliorisiH This user is from outside of this forum
            Heather Migliorisi
            wrote last edited by
            #91

            @sundogplanets - so much for ever seeing stars again

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • PalmAndNeedleP PalmAndNeedle

              @sundogplanets I do feel like we're on the path to Neil Stephenson's Seven Eves somehow

              Neo EhproqueE This user is from outside of this forum
              Neo EhproqueE This user is from outside of this forum
              Neo Ehproque
              wrote last edited by
              #92

              @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets luckily the satellites aren't big enough to wipe us out when they fall, but they may make impossible to put anything in orbit once enough of them crash against each other

              Deb E.D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Troed SångbergT Troed Sångberg

                @sundogplanets I'd still like journalists to start asking questions when "data centers in space" come up. Questions like:

                -"How will you cool them?"

                I really can't imagine there's a whole business plan drawn up thinking "space is really cold" will solve it but I'm starting to doubt ...

                �U This user is from outside of this forum
                �U This user is from outside of this forum
                �
                wrote last edited by
                #93

                @troed @sundogplanets afaik the only way to cool in space is by radiation. there is no air so no convection. judging from my noob knowledge, i think cooling in space is much more complicated than on earth. because you have only 1 of the 3 possible heat transfers

                �U 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                  Link Preview Image
                  SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                  In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                  favicon

                  PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                  David MarshallD This user is from outside of this forum
                  David MarshallD This user is from outside of this forum
                  David Marshall
                  wrote last edited by
                  #94

                  @sundogplanets

                  But, until Musk-Kessler Syndrome destroys all access to orbit for many decades, he'll give the world access to his "A.I". that will empower users to *checks notes* generate non-consensual pornography of women and children.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • �U �

                    @troed @sundogplanets afaik the only way to cool in space is by radiation. there is no air so no convection. judging from my noob knowledge, i think cooling in space is much more complicated than on earth. because you have only 1 of the 3 possible heat transfers

                    �U This user is from outside of this forum
                    �U This user is from outside of this forum
                    �
                    wrote last edited by
                    #95

                    @troed @sundogplanets damn, should be relpied to @ppulfer

                    >why is this a problem? Datacenters in space would eliminate a lot of problems like access to free solar energy, cooling, etc.

                    PatrickP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      Link Preview Image
                      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                      favicon

                      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                      King of TorsK This user is from outside of this forum
                      King of TorsK This user is from outside of this forum
                      King of Tors
                      wrote last edited by
                      #96

                      @sundogplanets why wouldn't the FCC robber-stamp it? Isn't their job to rubber-stamp shortsighted companies' plans?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                        Link Preview Image
                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                        favicon

                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                        estelleE This user is from outside of this forum
                        estelleE This user is from outside of this forum
                        estelle
                        wrote last edited by
                        #97

                        @sundogplanets ....uhhhhh.

                        okay, plan b, china builds as many nuclear reactors as it takes to laser broom earth orbit clean, and then we have about 40 years to figure out how to stop the aluminum oxides from destroying the ozone layer,

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • �U �

                          @troed @sundogplanets damn, should be relpied to @ppulfer

                          >why is this a problem? Datacenters in space would eliminate a lot of problems like access to free solar energy, cooling, etc.

                          PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
                          PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
                          Patrick
                          wrote last edited by
                          #98

                          @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, no worries. 🙂 Indeed, a much harder challenge but image the outcome if we would normalize this?

                          Tbf, I think we're not there yet and the announcement is more like a distraction but I'd welcome the actual technological outcome.

                          �U 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                            Tobias FiebigT This user is from outside of this forum
                            Tobias FiebigT This user is from outside of this forum
                            Tobias Fiebig
                            wrote last edited by
                            #99

                            @sundogplanets For my own sanity i haven't read the news yet, so no clue what you are making fun of here... Did Elon typo Kessler Syndrome again. 😂😅

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • PatrickP Patrick

                              @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, no worries. 🙂 Indeed, a much harder challenge but image the outcome if we would normalize this?

                              Tbf, I think we're not there yet and the announcement is more like a distraction but I'd welcome the actual technological outcome.

                              �U This user is from outside of this forum
                              �U This user is from outside of this forum
                              �
                              wrote last edited by
                              #100

                              @ppulfer @troed @sundogplanets tbh, i cannot imagine a useful outcome. mind to share your thoughts on the benefits?

                              PatrickP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • �U �

                                @ppulfer @troed @sundogplanets tbh, i cannot imagine a useful outcome. mind to share your thoughts on the benefits?

                                PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
                                PatrickP This user is from outside of this forum
                                Patrick
                                wrote last edited by
                                #101

                                @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, my thoughts are on the biggest resource consumption of a datacenter: Cooling and Energy, which is very taxing right now on our existing capabilities.

                                We'd shift from constant CO2 emitting energy consumption on earth to solar in space and move away from using fresh water for cooling, which is becoming more and more scarce.

                                �U Troed SångbergT David CohenD 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                  What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                  Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                  In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                  favicon

                                  PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                  LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺L This user is from outside of this forum
                                  LΞX/NØVΛ 🇪🇺
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #102

                                  @sundogplanets of course they will allow.

                                  They want this to be free of ALL privacy law, as Space is not regulated.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Neo EhproqueE Neo Ehproque

                                    @PalmAndNeedle @sundogplanets luckily the satellites aren't big enough to wipe us out when they fall, but they may make impossible to put anything in orbit once enough of them crash against each other

                                    Deb E.D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Deb E.D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Deb E.
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #103

                                    @PalmAndNeedle And I can't say I'm looking forward to the future damage to our ozone layer ... Again. @sundogplanets @ehproque

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                      "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                      THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Glitzersachen
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #104

                                      @sundogplanets

                                      Haha. Perhaps they mixed up Kardashev and Kessler...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                        favicon

                                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                        Luna LacteaJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Luna LacteaJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Luna Lactea
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #105

                                        @sundogplanets I suggest we all become amateur radio astronomers but instead of receiving we transmit. We agree on a satellite to fry every day until starlink costs too much to keep running.

                                        Obviously we can't do this. Not everyone can afford a radio transmission setup & a satellite antenna, & the FCC in the USA & the equivalents in other countries would be very mad, but I wish we could do this.

                                        Alpha Male Martha Stewart 🍉🌈F 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                          favicon

                                          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                          Syntaxxor 🏳️‍⚧️ :neobot:S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Syntaxxor 🏳️‍⚧️ :neobot:S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Syntaxxor 🏳️‍⚧️ :neobot:
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #106

                                          @sundogplanets@mastodon.social And for data centers, no less. These aren't providing some useful service, they're just running out of room to put their stupid AI data centers so they're trying to put them in orbit. What a fucking joke

                                          How will they even cool them??? Cooling tech in space is
                                          notoriously difficult as the only way to remove heat from a body in space is to radiate it off. And that's extremely slow. Aren't they already having enough trouble cooling their data centers inside an atmosphere?

                                          I'm just honestly stunned at the continuing level of destructive stupidity these people show. Can't wait for a million space-borne data centers to blot out the stars in order to provide...
                                          checks notes technology that still won't be able to provide correct information.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post