Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    Link Preview Image
    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

    favicon

    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

    Emily_SE This user is from outside of this forum
    Emily_SE This user is from outside of this forum
    Emily_S
    wrote last edited by
    #155

    @sundogplanets 30x more satellites than objects that we are currently tracking in orbit? (Including debris from stuff that blew or was blown up)

    One company?

    Well that's fucking ridiculous.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CarolynC Carolyn

      @fiend_unpleasant @sundogplanets that doesn’t mean it’s not wrong. They are possibly damaging our atmosphere, they ARE ruining our night sky, they are increasing risk of damage to people when they fall out of the sky, they are risking damage to flights beyond our atmosphere…

      That one government has the right to speak for all of us is crap.

      Alpha Male Martha Stewart 🍉🌈F This user is from outside of this forum
      Alpha Male Martha Stewart 🍉🌈F This user is from outside of this forum
      Alpha Male Martha Stewart 🍉🌈
      wrote last edited by
      #156

      @CStamp @sundogplanets I'm sorry I thought calling Elon Musk a giant child molesting, aspie supremacist, queef would have conveyed that I think he is wrong to do this.

      It's important to be factual when we are trying to stop shit heads from doing shit head things so they can't argue back.

      How do you think they could damage the atmosphere? And again the US government has jurisdiction over the Ka band in the US, not space. Anyone could decide they hate the new satellites and shoot them down.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

        THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

        oisinO This user is from outside of this forum
        oisinO This user is from outside of this forum
        oisin
        wrote last edited by
        #157

        @sundogplanets WHAT on earth are they going on about, they are like 12 year old boys

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

          Link Preview Image
          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

          favicon

          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

          ░ON░THE░AIR█R This user is from outside of this forum
          ░ON░THE░AIR█R This user is from outside of this forum
          ░ON░THE░AIR█
          wrote last edited by
          #158

          @sundogplanets Not to mention this is a terrible idea. Hard drives don't last that long and now we are gonna have to launch data recovery teams every time an orbiting RAID array goes down? Not practical at all. How is it these people get to say they are pragmatists and their plans are constantly more and more asinine.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            Link Preview Image
            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

            favicon

            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

            los0220L This user is from outside of this forum
            los0220L This user is from outside of this forum
            los0220
            wrote last edited by
            #159

            @sundogplanets At this point I'm quite sure they're deliberately trying to cause a Kessler syndrome, so we could never escape the hell billionaires are going to lay upon us.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              Link Preview Image
              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

              favicon

              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

              EarlE This user is from outside of this forum
              EarlE This user is from outside of this forum
              Earl
              wrote last edited by
              #160

              @sundogplanets

              Do you see the red laser making a giant letter X?

              This is a frame of video from "Attack on Skynet base ⧹ T800 Arrival | Terminator Genisys".

              You're only "dead" if you reject God's offer of eternal life through the Lord Jesus Christ, who died on a cross. Follow Him and live.

              Link Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                Link Preview Image
                SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                favicon

                PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                Reid :blobcat_happy:R This user is from outside of this forum
                Reid :blobcat_happy:R This user is from outside of this forum
                Reid :blobcat_happy:
                wrote last edited by
                #161
                @sundogplanets oh this surely won't render the planet's orbit unusable for generations, no way.

                But also, are you surprised one bit? This is the company that sent a car in space for the lolz
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                  MtorM This user is from outside of this forum
                  MtorM This user is from outside of this forum
                  Mtor
                  wrote last edited by
                  #162

                  @sundogplanets We aren’t even a Level 1 civilization. Also, this shows their complete lack of understanding of what that scale actually means.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    Link Preview Image
                    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                    favicon

                    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                    LauraL This user is from outside of this forum
                    LauraL This user is from outside of this forum
                    Laura
                    wrote last edited by
                    #163

                    @sundogplanets I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong with that. Completely risk free with no drawbacks whatsoever.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Michael BuschM Michael Busch

                      @zgryphon @sundogplanets

                      The radio astronomer Nikolai Kardashev developed a scale describing hypothetical aliens by the amount of energy they used as a guide for what SETI searches could and could not find.

                      A "Kardashev II" level would involve using the entire energy output of the Sun by dismantling planets and turning them into solar panels.

                      Which has no resemblance to this particular bit of vaporware.

                      Benjamin D. HutchinsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Benjamin D. HutchinsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      Benjamin D. Hutchins
                      wrote last edited by
                      #164

                      @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets Trust techbros not only to envision littering on a cosmic scale, but also to equate it with a theoretical hallmark of a hyperadvanced civilization.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai @sundogplanets@mastodon.social Hint: Ask yourself why datacenters use massive bundles of wired or fiber connections internally rather than WiFi.

                        GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                        GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                        GhostOnTheHalfShell
                        wrote last edited by
                        #165

                        @zakalwe @sundogplanets

                        🤔 🤪

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Ian Douglas ScottI Ian Douglas Scott

                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Plus the big question of how you cool a GPU datacenter surrounded by the vacuum of space.

                          But then, you probably don't really need to know anything about datacenters to realize that moving them into space is just going to make every aspect of them more difficult and expensive...

                          Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
                          Michael Gemar
                          wrote last edited by
                          #166

                          @ids1024 @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Exactly. The cooling issue alone should rule out space for data centres.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • PatrickP Patrick

                            @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, my thoughts are on the biggest resource consumption of a datacenter: Cooling and Energy, which is very taxing right now on our existing capabilities.

                            We'd shift from constant CO2 emitting energy consumption on earth to solar in space and move away from using fresh water for cooling, which is becoming more and more scarce.

                            David CohenD This user is from outside of this forum
                            David CohenD This user is from outside of this forum
                            David Cohen
                            wrote last edited by
                            #167

                            @ppulfer @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets Yeah, Elon might get away with ignoring laws here on Earth but you can’t do that with the laws of physics. Space is not full of magical infinite solar energy or cooling.

                            This is just a grift to keep the investment for his companies flowing in.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              Link Preview Image
                              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                              favicon

                              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                              llanciawnL This user is from outside of this forum
                              llanciawnL This user is from outside of this forum
                              llanciawn
                              wrote last edited by
                              #168

                              @sundogplanets #SpaceTwitter

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • OblomovO Oblomov

                                @mycotropic @sundogplanets and orbital days centers are a horrible idea

                                CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                CEDunn
                                wrote last edited by
                                #169

                                @oblomov @mycotropic @sundogplanets this is clearly just advertising BS. In addition to being a generally bad idea, 500-1000 km is well into the Van Allen belts, so the radiation makes this even more stupid

                                CEDunnC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                  slyborgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  slyborgS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  slyborg
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #170

                                  @sundogplanets >when the ketamine high hits
                                  “Grok, prepare an FCC filing…”

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                    favicon

                                    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                    Philip WittamoreV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Philip WittamoreV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Philip Wittamore
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #171

                                    @sundogplanets other countries will have to shoot them fown to get into space

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                      favicon

                                      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                      LightfighterL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      LightfighterL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Lightfighter
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #172

                                      @sundogplanets This is completely impossible to make work. Sounds more like a stock pump scam.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • CEDunnC CEDunn

                                        @oblomov @mycotropic @sundogplanets this is clearly just advertising BS. In addition to being a generally bad idea, 500-1000 km is well into the Van Allen belts, so the radiation makes this even more stupid

                                        CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        CEDunn
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #173

                                        @oblomov @mycotropic @sundogplanets

                                        CEDunn (@cdunnpasadena@sfba.social)

                                        So here is thought experiment. Design an “Orbital data center” satellite. Solve all of the problems- solar power, heat rejection, telecom to the customers, radiation design life, launch, end of life disposal, maneuvering and attitude control. Now take that satellite and stick it in the Mojave dessert. Maybe you need more solar power due to atmospheric attenuation and longer “eclipses” (night), and you need protection from the elements, but otherwise everything I listed above can be eliminated or greatly simplified. And, if it breaks or you have made a design error, you can fix it. Why would you ever launch one of these?

                                        favicon

                                        SFBA.social (sfba.social)

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                          Christian SchwägerlC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Christian SchwägerlC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Christian Schwägerl
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #174

                                          @sundogplanets What’s a Kardeshian II-level situation?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post