Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Luna LacteaJ Luna Lactea

    @sundogplanets I suggest we all become amateur radio astronomers but instead of receiving we transmit. We agree on a satellite to fry every day until starlink costs too much to keep running.

    Obviously we can't do this. Not everyone can afford a radio transmission setup & a satellite antenna, & the FCC in the USA & the equivalents in other countries would be very mad, but I wish we could do this.

    Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆF This user is from outside of this forum
    Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆF This user is from outside of this forum
    Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆ
    wrote last edited by
    #150

    @jackemled @sundogplanets Oh we CAN do this and yes the FCC in the USA & the equivalents in other countries would be VERY mad.

    I'm not far enough in my ham radio journey to help much in the procurement of Ka band equipment but I figure with enough hours of watching https://www.youtube.com/@saveitforparts someone should be able to figure out how to get the good stuff cheap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

      Link Preview Image
      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

      favicon

      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

      2rad02 This user is from outside of this forum
      2rad02 This user is from outside of this forum
      2rad0
      wrote last edited by
      #151

      @sundogplanets

      I don't know if that can be profitable, they have to convince a lot of suckers to pay a premium price for an inferior non-wired internet connection. Each node is deorbited every 5 years or so, so that's 200,000 nodes being turned into a dumpster fire and crashing back to earth each year. say each costs $1,000, then it's a billion in overhead they throw away just to repopulate the mesh hardware every 5 years, ignoring the even more critical launch, operations, and insurance costs, I suspect hardware costs are well over $1,000 per node, but I can't find any real numbers to base this on.

      The bigger problem though is why TF are phone companies even entertaining the idea of participating in the creation of a new competitor that could easily turn into a monopoly and crush them?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

        Link Preview Image
        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

        favicon

        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

        Arnd LayerI This user is from outside of this forum
        Arnd LayerI This user is from outside of this forum
        Arnd Layer
        wrote last edited by
        #152

        @sundogplanets
        My only thought: externalities

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Kiloku - SecretΓ‘rio do CaosK Kiloku - SecretΓ‘rio do Caos

          @sundogplanets not that it matters, but it also wouldn't budge a thing in the kardashev scale, as it's supposed to measure how much power civilization can harness, and they certainly would pale in comparison to the total amount of earth based computing power, not to mention all the power used in non-computing usage

          Legit_SpaghettiL This user is from outside of this forum
          Legit_SpaghettiL This user is from outside of this forum
          Legit_Spaghetti
          wrote last edited by
          #153

          @Kiloku @sundogplanets The Kardashev scale is meaningless drivel. It's just some dude making shit up in the 1960s to get government funding from the Soviets. Anyone who references the scale like it's meaningful, ESPECIALLY in an official filing, is not a serious person.

          All of these tech idiots need to be bullied aggressively until they go away. We need to locate that idiot from Pretoria's childhood bullies and get some historical data to kick things off.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            Link Preview Image
            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

            favicon

            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

            Kai, sounds like the skyK This user is from outside of this forum
            Kai, sounds like the skyK This user is from outside of this forum
            Kai, sounds like the sky
            wrote last edited by
            #154

            @sundogplanets I kind of think the project is cool as fuck and makes a ton of sense. Fuck that guy obviously

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              Link Preview Image
              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

              favicon

              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

              Emily_SE This user is from outside of this forum
              Emily_SE This user is from outside of this forum
              Emily_S
              wrote last edited by
              #155

              @sundogplanets 30x more satellites than objects that we are currently tracking in orbit? (Including debris from stuff that blew or was blown up)

              One company?

              Well that's fucking ridiculous.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CarolynC Carolyn

                @fiend_unpleasant @sundogplanets that doesn’t mean it’s not wrong. They are possibly damaging our atmosphere, they ARE ruining our night sky, they are increasing risk of damage to people when they fall out of the sky, they are risking damage to flights beyond our atmosphere…

                That one government has the right to speak for all of us is crap.

                Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆF This user is from outside of this forum
                Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆF This user is from outside of this forum
                Alpha Male Martha Stewart πŸ‰πŸŒˆ
                wrote last edited by
                #156

                @CStamp @sundogplanets I'm sorry I thought calling Elon Musk a giant child molesting, aspie supremacist, queef would have conveyed that I think he is wrong to do this.

                It's important to be factual when we are trying to stop shit heads from doing shit head things so they can't argue back.

                How do you think they could damage the atmosphere? And again the US government has jurisdiction over the Ka band in the US, not space. Anyone could decide they hate the new satellites and shoot them down.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                  oisinO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oisinO This user is from outside of this forum
                  oisin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #157

                  @sundogplanets WHAT on earth are they going on about, they are like 12 year old boys

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                    Link Preview Image
                    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                    favicon

                    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                    β–‘ONβ–‘THEβ–‘AIRβ–ˆR This user is from outside of this forum
                    β–‘ONβ–‘THEβ–‘AIRβ–ˆR This user is from outside of this forum
                    β–‘ONβ–‘THEβ–‘AIRβ–ˆ
                    wrote last edited by
                    #158

                    @sundogplanets Not to mention this is a terrible idea. Hard drives don't last that long and now we are gonna have to launch data recovery teams every time an orbiting RAID array goes down? Not practical at all. How is it these people get to say they are pragmatists and their plans are constantly more and more asinine.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                      What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                      Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                      Link Preview Image
                      SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                      In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                      favicon

                      PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                      los0220L This user is from outside of this forum
                      los0220L This user is from outside of this forum
                      los0220
                      wrote last edited by
                      #159

                      @sundogplanets At this point I'm quite sure they're deliberately trying to cause a Kessler syndrome, so we could never escape the hell billionaires are going to lay upon us.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                        Link Preview Image
                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                        favicon

                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                        EarlE This user is from outside of this forum
                        EarlE This user is from outside of this forum
                        Earl
                        wrote last edited by
                        #160

                        @sundogplanets

                        Do you see the red laser making a giant letter X?

                        This is a frame of video from "Attack on Skynet base ⧹ T800 Arrival | Terminator Genisys".

                        You're only "dead" if you reject God's offer of eternal life through the Lord Jesus Christ, who died on a cross. Follow Him and live.

                        Link Preview Image
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                          What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                          Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                          Link Preview Image
                          SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                          In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                          favicon

                          PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                          Reid :blobcat_happy:R This user is from outside of this forum
                          Reid :blobcat_happy:R This user is from outside of this forum
                          Reid :blobcat_happy:
                          wrote last edited by
                          #161
                          @sundogplanets oh this surely won't render the planet's orbit unusable for generations, no way.

                          But also, are you surprised one bit? This is the company that sent a car in space for the lolz
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                            MtorM This user is from outside of this forum
                            MtorM This user is from outside of this forum
                            Mtor
                            wrote last edited by
                            #162

                            @sundogplanets We aren’t even a Level 1 civilization. Also, this shows their complete lack of understanding of what that scale actually means.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              Link Preview Image
                              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                              favicon

                              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                              LauraL This user is from outside of this forum
                              LauraL This user is from outside of this forum
                              Laura
                              wrote last edited by
                              #163

                              @sundogplanets I'm sure nothing could possibly go wrong with that. Completely risk free with no drawbacks whatsoever.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Michael BuschM Michael Busch

                                @zgryphon @sundogplanets

                                The radio astronomer Nikolai Kardashev developed a scale describing hypothetical aliens by the amount of energy they used as a guide for what SETI searches could and could not find.

                                A "Kardashev II" level would involve using the entire energy output of the Sun by dismantling planets and turning them into solar panels.

                                Which has no resemblance to this particular bit of vaporware.

                                Benjamin D. HutchinsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Benjamin D. HutchinsZ This user is from outside of this forum
                                Benjamin D. Hutchins
                                wrote last edited by
                                #164

                                @michael_w_busch @sundogplanets Trust techbros not only to envision littering on a cosmic scale, but also to equate it with a theoretical hallmark of a hyperadvanced civilization.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Sean FenianZ Sean Fenian

                                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai @sundogplanets@mastodon.social Hint: Ask yourself why datacenters use massive bundles of wired or fiber connections internally rather than WiFi.

                                  GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  GhostOnTheHalfShellG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  GhostOnTheHalfShell
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #165

                                  @zakalwe @sundogplanets

                                  πŸ€” πŸ€ͺ

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Ian Douglas ScottI Ian Douglas Scott

                                    @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Plus the big question of how you cool a GPU datacenter surrounded by the vacuum of space.

                                    But then, you probably don't really need to know anything about datacenters to realize that moving them into space is just going to make every aspect of them more difficult and expensive...

                                    Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Michael GemarM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Michael Gemar
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #166

                                    @ids1024 @GhostOnTheHalfShell @sundogplanets Exactly. The cooling issue alone should rule out space for data centres.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • PatrickP Patrick

                                      @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets, my thoughts are on the biggest resource consumption of a datacenter: Cooling and Energy, which is very taxing right now on our existing capabilities.

                                      We'd shift from constant CO2 emitting energy consumption on earth to solar in space and move away from using fresh water for cooling, which is becoming more and more scarce.

                                      David CohenD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      David CohenD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      David Cohen
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #167

                                      @ppulfer @utf_7 @troed @sundogplanets Yeah, Elon might get away with ignoring laws here on Earth but you can’t do that with the laws of physics. Space is not full of magical infinite solar energy or cooling.

                                      This is just a grift to keep the investment for his companies flowing in.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                        What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                                        Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                                        In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                                        favicon

                                        PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                                        llanciawnL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        llanciawnL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        llanciawn
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #168

                                        @sundogplanets #SpaceTwitter

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • OblomovO Oblomov

                                          @mycotropic @sundogplanets and orbital days centers are a horrible idea

                                          CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          CEDunnC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          CEDunn
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #169

                                          @oblomov @mycotropic @sundogplanets this is clearly just advertising BS. In addition to being a generally bad idea, 500-1000 km is well into the Van Allen belts, so the radiation makes this even more stupid

                                          CEDunnC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post