Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Carney’s Message to the World: The Rules No Longer Protect You | The Walrus

Carney’s Message to the World: The Rules No Longer Protect You | The Walrus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
87 Posts 57 Posters 88 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A alloi@lemmy.world

    hes obviously the best option we can realistically hope for in our current social/political structure. HOWEVER. hes a politician, and a very wealthy banker. so dont miss the mountain for the trees here.

    quietly pushing digital ID, AI, increased surveillance, decreased personal privacy, subverting charter rights and constitutional rights, giving our information without warrant to the police, our government, and the united states government and corporations, using tax payer funding to pay for private interest projects that directly undermine green energy and expand american, and other foreign financial interest in our countries resources. removing canadians ability to defend themselves against an apparantly imminent foreign invasion by reducing firearm availability and punishing legal gun owners as a result of an issue directly correlated to illegal firearms imported from the united states. all the while increasing police funding and military funding which also directly puts tax payer money into the pockets of military contractors, foreign and domestic. limiting the ability to defend our sovereignity to government employees rather than average citizens.

    he gives a great speech, he is much better than pierre poilievre, however, he does not represent 99% of canadians, he represents the rich, industry, and established/emerging monopolies above all else. the new world order he speaks of is one where we will continue to struggle financially as workers so that corporations and the elite can maintain stable control over a productive yet exhausted population. snowballing the concentration of wealth and power to the elite, and new emerging elite class. while reducing ownership for consumers in virtually every single sector you can imagine. fuelling our economy with an indebted population.

    the new boot on our heads is just a bit more polished and expensive, but it is still a boot on our heads. and its going to be a bit heavier than it was before. but with the right marketing, we will always beg for more, thinking its for our own good.

    so unless you are already quite well off, dont expect a grand shift in your fortunes and affordability. not just because of him, or trump, or a new economic model, but the class that they both represent. the elites are shifting the board, and the people, as always, will bear the brunt of it all. while they make off like faceless bandits, and we infight against one another, fearful of immigrants, foreign powers, differing ideologies, and general security.

    politicians are merely puppets, scape goats, hitmen, and sin eaters for the wealthy and poor alike. hired to take the guilt, shame, glory, and responsibility of our wanted desires so that we do not have to. when it goes good or bad we claim proudly or sheepishly who we voted for, and blame each other for the outcomes, regardless of how good or bad they may actually be, instead of directly addressing the faceless manipulators who guided and uplifted every single head of state in the modern world, for their benefit.

    that is the beauty of being an elite, all the riches and glory, and no repercussions. the social backlash is for the political lackies.

    when any head of state speaks, pretend they are only speaking to the wealthy. because they are.

    “its a big club, and you aint in it”

    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    budakai@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    This is the answer I feel sums up my feelings best. Really good nuanced take on Carney. Love him for the leader we need right now, but the last thing the world needs is more neoliberal and enshittified ideas. Hate how his ideas apply to countries, but not citizens. Corporate hegemony has been an issue in Canada since Confederation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • acargitzT acargitz

      This was a historic speech and I sincerely hope the European leaders get the message. It was also very surprising to hear him lay bare the problem with the old world order and talking about a new one that would live up to its ideals. There is more to Carney than I thought.

      I still oppose many of his domestic policies that I consider too right wing. But that’s what a democracy is about.

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #53

      There is more to Carney than I thought.

      Having read his book before the election, this is exactly who I expected when I voted.

      S F 2 Replies Last reply
      5
      • R rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works

        Not so idealistic once the war machine turns its eyes upon you, right? But it was fine when only poor countries were on the list. Institutionalized hypocrisy.

        R This user is from outside of this forum
        R This user is from outside of this forum
        ragepaw@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #54

        Did you watch the speech? He said pretty much that point.

        Or are you anti-red no matter what because you have the imbecile like belief that politics is a team sport, and you always root for your team, even when they’re a bunch of losers.

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • B budakai@lemmy.ca
          This post did not contain any content.
          Just a moment...

          favicon

          (thewalrus.ca)

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          soup@lemmy.world
          wrote on last edited by
          #55

          Carney, and the Liberals and centrists in general, constantly resist real change. He acts more like a conservative than anything, and even very recently tried to screw over the Air Canada attendants when they tried to fight for fair pay. He’s selling off our resources to private companies and laying off government workers during a time where those people will seriously struggle to find new work.

          The speech was decent, I guess, but coming from Carney it’s just a bad joke. Like Trudeau kneeling with the BLM protesters, he’s demanding better behaviour from world leaders while being a world leader who can’t behave himself. Pretty, empty words from a weak man.

          We should listen and form a new world order, and we should make sure that he doesn’t get to pretend like he was on the right side of history.

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          12
          • K kent_eh@lemmy.ca

            There is more to Carney than I thought.

            Having read his book before the election, this is exactly who I expected when I voted.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            soup@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #56

            A liar? A guy who busts union strikes who rides in on his high horse to tell everyone else they need to create a new world order? The guy who sells our natural resources to private companies for a quick buck and lays off thousands of government jobs in a time where those people will have an immensely difficuly time getting jobs? The guy who handles finances like a conservative?

            You hoped for someone to create a progressive new future and you voted for Carney? And you’re just admitting that openly? That’s wild, dude.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            7
            • S soup@lemmy.world

              Carney, and the Liberals and centrists in general, constantly resist real change. He acts more like a conservative than anything, and even very recently tried to screw over the Air Canada attendants when they tried to fight for fair pay. He’s selling off our resources to private companies and laying off government workers during a time where those people will seriously struggle to find new work.

              The speech was decent, I guess, but coming from Carney it’s just a bad joke. Like Trudeau kneeling with the BLM protesters, he’s demanding better behaviour from world leaders while being a world leader who can’t behave himself. Pretty, empty words from a weak man.

              We should listen and form a new world order, and we should make sure that he doesn’t get to pretend like he was on the right side of history.

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              armchairace1944@discuss.online
              wrote on last edited by
              #57

              Carney is very conservative. He was well liked by Harper and is to the right of Trudeau. We really need actual leftists and not bankers leading the way and I regret voting for him and not voting NDP or to a communist party (even if they had no chance of winning).

              S ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU 2 Replies Last reply
              13
              • H hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works

                Listening to him again reminded me of '08 when he helped lead us out of the Wall St shit storm. It’s the main reason I voted for him too. He tells the truth - no sugar coating, no dumb cliches, no lies to make you feel better.

                I’m not happy with everything he’s done (see Bill C-2) but when things get rough he lays the cards on the table and says it like it is.

                A This user is from outside of this forum
                A This user is from outside of this forum
                armchairace1944@discuss.online
                wrote on last edited by
                #58

                Bill C-2 isn’t law yet. It needs to be crushed to dust and never considered again. In fact most post-2000s terrorism legislation needs to be repealed. It has never protected anyone but simply made dissent harder and less effective.

                1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • H hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works

                  Don’t worry. Trump is speaking in Davos tomorrow.

                  Oh happy days. 🙄

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  buffaloseven
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #59

                  Well, he called Greenland “Iceland” 4 times in a meandering, somewhat incoherent ramble of a speech.

                  H 1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • A armchairace1944@discuss.online

                    Carney is very conservative. He was well liked by Harper and is to the right of Trudeau. We really need actual leftists and not bankers leading the way and I regret voting for him and not voting NDP or to a communist party (even if they had no chance of winning).

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    soup@lemmy.world
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #60

                    If everyone who voted for the party that aligned with their views I think they’d be pretty surprised at who really had “no chance of winning”. The Liberals didn’t throw voting reform in the garbage for nothing.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    10
                    • S soup@lemmy.world

                      A liar? A guy who busts union strikes who rides in on his high horse to tell everyone else they need to create a new world order? The guy who sells our natural resources to private companies for a quick buck and lays off thousands of government jobs in a time where those people will have an immensely difficuly time getting jobs? The guy who handles finances like a conservative?

                      You hoped for someone to create a progressive new future and you voted for Carney? And you’re just admitting that openly? That’s wild, dude.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #61

                      Can you imagine pp in this moment, jfc

                      R S S 3 Replies Last reply
                      9
                      • B buffaloseven

                        Well, he called Greenland “Iceland” 4 times in a meandering, somewhat incoherent ramble of a speech.

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        hellsbelle@sh.itjust.works
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #62

                        I was reading The Guardian’s live feed of his speech and it was freaking hilarious.

                        Stuff like, “Trump is speaking on how Canada should appreciate him, and now he’s off on another tangent.” Lol.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • T tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                          Can you imagine pp in this moment, jfc

                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #63

                          The guy you responded to is on the far left economically. Think the polar opposite of libertarian, who thinks there are no redeeming qualities of our current economic systems, and rather than fixing things incrementally, if we instead massively overhaul the system, we will surely have a much better economic picture.

                          Not sure what he believes about democracy, but I’m guessing he also objects to that as well. In other words, hardly with the time of day.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • A armchairace1944@discuss.online

                            Carney is very conservative. He was well liked by Harper and is to the right of Trudeau. We really need actual leftists and not bankers leading the way and I regret voting for him and not voting NDP or to a communist party (even if they had no chance of winning).

                            ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                            ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU This user is from outside of this forum
                            ultragigagigantic@lemmy.ml
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #64

                            We really need actual leftists and not bankers leading the way and I regret voting for him and not voting NDP or to a communist party (even if they had no chance of winning)

                            Why would you have to worry if they would win or not? Didn’t the liberal party get elected with a mandate to pass electoral reform recently? Surely they would keep their promises!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • S soup@lemmy.world

                              If everyone who voted for the party that aligned with their views I think they’d be pretty surprised at who really had “no chance of winning”. The Liberals didn’t throw voting reform in the garbage for nothing.

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              armchairace1944@lemmy.ca
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #65

                              I voted for Carney because I dreaded PP. I didn’t realize the extent of how much he would be talking out of both sides of his mouth. On one hand acting like it is all over, but on the other hand doing everything he can to appease the US and passing online and ‘strong borders’ act that effectively destroy privacy online for Canadians AND share or straight up hand that information over to the US authorities just like that.

                              M S S 3 Replies Last reply
                              5
                              • A armchairace1944@lemmy.ca

                                I voted for Carney because I dreaded PP. I didn’t realize the extent of how much he would be talking out of both sides of his mouth. On one hand acting like it is all over, but on the other hand doing everything he can to appease the US and passing online and ‘strong borders’ act that effectively destroy privacy online for Canadians AND share or straight up hand that information over to the US authorities just like that.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                murdoc@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #66

                                I think that this is likely just how politics is done now. On one hand you have a guy that will keep giving the elites what they want. On the other, you have a complete wackadoo that’ll scare the voters into picking the first guy. It’s like voting with a gun to your head.

                                As a bonus, if on the off chance people do end up voting for the wackadoo, well then it’s party time. We have plenty of current examples of that.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • A armchairace1944@lemmy.ca

                                  I voted for Carney because I dreaded PP. I didn’t realize the extent of how much he would be talking out of both sides of his mouth. On one hand acting like it is all over, but on the other hand doing everything he can to appease the US and passing online and ‘strong borders’ act that effectively destroy privacy online for Canadians AND share or straight up hand that information over to the US authorities just like that.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  soup@lemmy.world
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #67

                                  I’m just amazed that you were surprised. That’s how the Liberals have always been, constantly trying to play it safe except that safe has just meant doing the things that don’t piss off rich corporations or the US too much because they’re afraid of standing up for us.

                                  Ten years ago they ran on voting reform and then, when a committee made up of people from every party said that they needed to ditch FPTP they said it was “too difficult” and then never spoke about it again because that same committee also showed them that they would lose a lot of ground if people got to actually choose what they wanted. Doing that they openly stated that they don’t give a single flying fuck about democracy and we STILL consider them a serious party? Yea, fuck that noise.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • T tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                    Can you imagine pp in this moment, jfc

                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                                    soup@lemmy.world
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #68

                                    Horrible, obviously. But why do we constantly force ourselves into steadily worse situations with the center-right to the point where we even have to consider that at all? And besides, that’s always the same lame excuse. It’s going to come up eventually and we may as well be equipped to fight back, unlike right now were we just have Harper style Conservatives instead of PP style ones. Congrats, we’re fucking stupid.

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • S soup@lemmy.world

                                      Horrible, obviously. But why do we constantly force ourselves into steadily worse situations with the center-right to the point where we even have to consider that at all? And besides, that’s always the same lame excuse. It’s going to come up eventually and we may as well be equipped to fight back, unlike right now were we just have Harper style Conservatives instead of PP style ones. Congrats, we’re fucking stupid.

                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #69

                                      Can’t argue with that, just seems that carney was the best equipped out of the choices we had to meet this moment, even if he’s not perfect. I do hope for an ndp future, but here we are…

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                        The guy you responded to is on the far left economically. Think the polar opposite of libertarian, who thinks there are no redeeming qualities of our current economic systems, and rather than fixing things incrementally, if we instead massively overhaul the system, we will surely have a much better economic picture.

                                        Not sure what he believes about democracy, but I’m guessing he also objects to that as well. In other words, hardly with the time of day.

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        soup@lemmy.world
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #70

                                        This is the most illiterate, brain-dead take of what I’ve been saying. Yea, I hate democracy because I want us to vote for the parties which align with our beliefs and I think that the party which canned any hope of voting reform, specifically because it would mean they would start losing if we got to really choose, is a party of liars that we shouldn’t support. Ya know, because they were told the only way to win was to steal elections and they values winning more than democracy. And I’M the one who hates democracy? Get so bent, coward.

                                        The Liberals a) are going more right over time so that’s hardly fixing anything at any pace and b) we do not have 200+ years for things to slowly get better when we have the scientific community screaming and begging us to do the right thing today. We don’t have time for broken promises and feel-good speeches made by those whose actions do not support the words they’re saying.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • T tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                          Can’t argue with that, just seems that carney was the best equipped out of the choices we had to meet this moment, even if he’s not perfect. I do hope for an ndp future, but here we are…

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          soup@lemmy.world
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #71

                                          If you hope for an NDP future then you have to support it even when it’s scary. We keep kneecapping them and then complaining when they don’t have the power to do the objectively better things they promise. They even still manage to get some shit done when they can create coalitions and force the Liberals to actually do some good for the country. The NDP is the reason why we have even a small amount of dental coverage, for example, and then we go off about how they don’t know politics the same like what the hell are we smoking?

                                          I’ll never get what people mean when they say that Singh “wasn’t ready” while voting for a bunch of losers who had no business being in government and who, even if they were “ready”, used that readiness to fuck us over. Imagine if the people of Middle Earth looked at Aragorn* and said “well he’s never been king before and Denethor might be straight-up insane but he UnDeRsTaNdS pOLiTiCs and with Sauron right there is now really the Right Time™?”. That’d be crazy, and we’d all have walked out of the theatre, yet we’re doing exactly that.

                                          *I’m not saying Singh is Aragorn-like and will not engage with anyone ignoring the obvious message in favour of hanging on that part of an analogy.

                                          T 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post