Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Quebec to ban public prayer in sweeping new secularism law

Quebec to ban public prayer in sweeping new secularism law

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
71 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

    It’s not racism with more steps. You don’t even know it has not been enforced improperly. It’s a lot easier to enforce enforcement than it is to stop people ruining the world

    acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
    acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
    acargitz
    wrote on last edited by theacharnian@lemmy.ca
    #60

    Only we do know exactly the results of the CAQ’s “laïcité” laws:

    Link Preview Image
    New research shows Bill 21 having 'devastating' impact on religious minorities in Quebec | CBC News

    A new survey shows the negative impact Bill 21 is having on Quebec’s religious minorities three years after the law was adopted.  But the research also reveals overall support for the law, while still strong, is full of contradictions.

    favicon

    CBC (www.cbc.ca)

    Bury your head in the sand all you like but the systemic racism that is embedded in the social outcomes of these laws is undeniable and palpable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P punnyname@lemmy.world

      Then that’s not prayer, it’s being a public nuisance, a disturber of the peace. That’s a different crime / tort that I’m sure is already on the books.

      The prayer part is irrelevant.

      There’s a precedent like this in the US: enhancement laws

      They ruin lives, and don’t stop crime.

      V This user is from outside of this forum
      V This user is from outside of this forum
      velindora@lemmy.cafe
      wrote on last edited by
      #61

      So what is an example of something you think this topic is referring to? It’s not referring to a family doing a quick prayer before a public meal.

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • acargitzT acargitz

        It just so happens that it always boils down to policing what Muslims do. Just one big coincidence.

        J This user is from outside of this forum
        J This user is from outside of this forum
        jaselle@lemmy.ca
        wrote on last edited by
        #62

        That’s very fair yes. But how can you tell those who are anti-religion for racist reasons from those who are for not?

        acargitzT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jaselle@lemmy.ca

          That’s very fair yes. But how can you tell those who are anti-religion for racist reasons from those who are for not?

          acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
          acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
          acargitz
          wrote on last edited by theacharnian@lemmy.ca
          #63

          There are two hazards in our discussion:

          1. someone being called racist
          2. someone suffering from systemic racism

          I prioritize hazard 1 as having a lower consequence than hazard 2.

          In other words, I care much more about eradicating systemic racism than the hurt feelings of someone whose motives are misunderstood.

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • acargitzT acargitz

            There are two hazards in our discussion:

            1. someone being called racist
            2. someone suffering from systemic racism

            I prioritize hazard 1 as having a lower consequence than hazard 2.

            In other words, I care much more about eradicating systemic racism than the hurt feelings of someone whose motives are misunderstood.

            J This user is from outside of this forum
            J This user is from outside of this forum
            jaselle@lemmy.ca
            wrote on last edited by
            #64

            OK that’s a good argument. It’s perhaps a flaw of the word “racist” that it can include systemic racism, when it connotes individual racism.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

              So what is an example of something you think this topic is referring to? It’s not referring to a family doing a quick prayer before a public meal.

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              punnyname@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #65

              It sounds like a bunch of flimsy bullshit in order to legally oppress practicing religious freedoms.

              You should always question why law enforcement gets extra work.

              V 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P punnyname@lemmy.world

                It sounds like a bunch of flimsy bullshit in order to legally oppress practicing religious freedoms.

                You should always question why law enforcement gets extra work.

                V This user is from outside of this forum
                V This user is from outside of this forum
                velindora@lemmy.cafe
                wrote on last edited by
                #66

                So, you’re not able to answer my question or you’re refusing to?

                I don’t disagree that giving law enforcement more work should be questioned, but… religious people are the cause of… most of the world’s problems. So I don’t have a ton of empathy. Keep it in your church.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

                  So, you’re not able to answer my question or you’re refusing to?

                  I don’t disagree that giving law enforcement more work should be questioned, but… religious people are the cause of… most of the world’s problems. So I don’t have a ton of empathy. Keep it in your church.

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  punnyname@lemmy.world
                  wrote on last edited by punnyname@lemmy.world
                  #67

                  Why should I have to answer your question? What makes you so special that I’m required to do indulge in your navel gazing?

                  Making the practice of prayer illegal in any form is asinine and an overstepping of personal freedoms.

                  If you can’t understand that, start looking at every fascist entity of the past, and realize you’re on the wrong side.

                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P punnyname@lemmy.world

                    Why should I have to answer your question? What makes you so special that I’m required to do indulge in your navel gazing?

                    Making the practice of prayer illegal in any form is asinine and an overstepping of personal freedoms.

                    If you can’t understand that, start looking at every fascist entity of the past, and realize you’re on the wrong side.

                    V This user is from outside of this forum
                    V This user is from outside of this forum
                    velindora@lemmy.cafe
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #68

                    I disagree. Sorry. Religious people are just… the cause of most problems in the world.

                    It sounds like your idea of “fascism” is Socialism without Religion… sign me up.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

                      I disagree. Sorry. Religious people are just… the cause of most problems in the world.

                      It sounds like your idea of “fascism” is Socialism without Religion… sign me up.

                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      P This user is from outside of this forum
                      punnyname@lemmy.world
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #69

                      People using religion to oppress and usurp others, yes.

                      People just having a personal relationship with whatever they believe in? No.

                      Often, what one would see as a crime or nuisance while observing “religious practices” is simply another already codified behavior. Also, meditation could be constructed as prayer under the vagueness of these kinds of laws.

                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • P punnyname@lemmy.world

                        People using religion to oppress and usurp others, yes.

                        People just having a personal relationship with whatever they believe in? No.

                        Often, what one would see as a crime or nuisance while observing “religious practices” is simply another already codified behavior. Also, meditation could be constructed as prayer under the vagueness of these kinds of laws.

                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        velindora@lemmy.cafe
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #70

                        No one is saying that a person cannot be religious. They are saying that they cannot pray on the side of the street. It’s cold on the side of the street, you have a dedicated place for this. I imagine that it has comfortable seats, made of solid gold, and people that you know. Go there, get the fuck out of my face with your fucking bigotry and hate.

                        Religion had its time, and it failed. Get back in the fucking closet.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P punnyname@lemmy.world

                          Then don’t be in that space?

                          So you feel the same when a bunch of people are meditating? Same action, really.

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          khar21@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by khar21@lemmy.ca
                          #71

                          It’s a public park, and I’m not gonna advocate for banning it, but it does make me uncomfortable and if they eventually start blasting the quran in public (like the government does in Iran) I will support banning it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0

                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          • First post
                            Last post