Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Bill C-5 just became law with ZERO new changes. Here's what that means (it's not good)

Bill C-5 just became law with ZERO new changes. Here's what that means (it's not good)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
32 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
    • Invidious
    • Youtube
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    bdot@lemmy.world
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    any time a government is trying to fast track a bill, every resident should be paying special attention; no matter their party of choice.

    pretty crazy that this came from the Liberals

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    27
    • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
      • Invidious
      • Youtube
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      teppa
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Wow, theyre prioritizing the well being of the country over the environment and indigenous people?

      Its like they’re finally trying to keep us in a first world standard of living; because they were about to be destroyed as a party entirely if they did not.

      recursive_recursion they/themR ComradeSharkfuckerS 2 Replies Last reply
      3
      • T teppa

        Wow, theyre prioritizing the well being of the country over the environment and indigenous people?

        Its like they’re finally trying to keep us in a first world standard of living; because they were about to be destroyed as a party entirely if they did not.

        recursive_recursion they/themR This user is from outside of this forum
        recursive_recursion they/themR This user is from outside of this forum
        recursive_recursion they/them
        wrote on last edited by recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca
        #5

        Promised actions of good should never come at the expense of any singular group, minority, people.

        In addition destroying our land to fuel the economic engine will only benefit capitalist systems and corporations.

        I’ve yet to see how this would sustainably benefit foreign people in their own country so to import this into Canada seems ridiculous.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        17
        • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them

          Promised actions of good should never come at the expense of any singular group, minority, people.

          In addition destroying our land to fuel the economic engine will only benefit capitalist systems and corporations.

          I’ve yet to see how this would sustainably benefit foreign people in their own country so to import this into Canada seems ridiculous.

          T This user is from outside of this forum
          T This user is from outside of this forum
          teppa
          wrote on last edited by teppa@piefed.ca
          #6

          It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

          Its an export of a product, which derives tax revenue, which derives income taxes, which results in government programs to help the poor. Pretending like its not vital in our ecosystem is silly, its our food source, it provides us building materials, corporate exports give your dollar value and are the red blood cells of society.

          recursive_recursion they/themR ComradeSharkfuckerS H 3 Replies Last reply
          3
          • T teppa

            It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

            Its an export of a product, which derives tax revenue, which derives income taxes, which results in government programs to help the poor. Pretending like its not vital in our ecosystem is silly, its our food source, it provides us building materials, corporate exports give your dollar value and are the red blood cells of society.

            recursive_recursion they/themR This user is from outside of this forum
            recursive_recursion they/themR This user is from outside of this forum
            recursive_recursion they/them
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

            Fedecan is a nonprofit

            I’m not paid to do anything

            1 Reply Last reply
            10
            • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
              • Invidious
              • Youtube
              K This user is from outside of this forum
              K This user is from outside of this forum
              Kobek
              wrote on last edited by kobek@sh.itjust.works
              #8

              Everyone hates Trump so much but have learned nothing. Don’t you get it? Parties are just a tool for populists, and that is exactly what Carney is.

              I am definitely not a communist but didn’t Marx say something about false consciousness? Keep worshiping the rich because they are on your “team” and you’ll pay for it. Yeah elect a billionaire to fight another billionaire and the people are somehow going to benefit? It’s ridiculous.

              ComradeSharkfuckerS 1 Reply Last reply
              19
              • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
                • Invidious
                • Youtube
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                N This user is from outside of this forum
                Nomecks
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Seems like a no lose scenario for the Liberals: Courts will strike this down and the Liberals take another talking point away from the Conservatives.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • T teppa

                  It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

                  Its an export of a product, which derives tax revenue, which derives income taxes, which results in government programs to help the poor. Pretending like its not vital in our ecosystem is silly, its our food source, it provides us building materials, corporate exports give your dollar value and are the red blood cells of society.

                  ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                  ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                  ComradeSharkfucker
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

                  Lmao, the workers do not share in the profits of corporations. As if 😭

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  19
                  • T teppa

                    Wow, theyre prioritizing the well being of the country over the environment and indigenous people?

                    Its like they’re finally trying to keep us in a first world standard of living; because they were about to be destroyed as a party entirely if they did not.

                    ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                    ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                    ComradeSharkfucker
                    wrote on last edited by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml
                    #11

                    Your well being depends on the environment and any improvement to your well being should not come at a detriment to the people your country colonized and genocided.

                    Environmental protection acts do not exist to protect the environment. They exist to protect you from what business owners will do to your environment in the name of profit seeking.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    36
                    • ComradeSharkfuckerS ComradeSharkfucker

                      It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

                      Lmao, the workers do not share in the profits of corporations. As if 😭

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      teppa
                      wrote on last edited by teppa@piefed.ca
                      #12

                      Theyre literally paid out of the profits. You’re spouting nonsense.

                      ComradeSharkfuckerS Nik282000N acargitzT 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • T teppa

                        It only benefits corporations huh, do you not work for a corporation yourself?

                        Its an export of a product, which derives tax revenue, which derives income taxes, which results in government programs to help the poor. Pretending like its not vital in our ecosystem is silly, its our food source, it provides us building materials, corporate exports give your dollar value and are the red blood cells of society.

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        howrar@lemmy.ca
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Take from one group of poor people to benefit another group of poor people? That doesn’t sound like a good thing to me.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        5
                        • T teppa

                          Theyre literally paid out of the profits. You’re spouting nonsense.

                          ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                          ComradeSharkfuckerS This user is from outside of this forum
                          ComradeSharkfucker
                          wrote on last edited by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml
                          #14

                          You receive a miniscule percentage of the value you create for your employer. The employer needs profits to increase constantly in order to provide value to the shareholders. When the total value of the company increases you at best receive the same cut of the value your produce. Usually though, your percentage cut decreases relative to total value so that the employer can extract greater value as demanded by shareholders. You aren’t paid out of the profits, they take a cut of the value you produce by virtue of owning the company. This is why wages do not increase proportionally to productivity. I am not spouting nonsense, you just aren’t equipped to understand what I am saying.

                          Nik282000N 1 Reply Last reply
                          12
                          • T teppa

                            Theyre literally paid out of the profits. You’re spouting nonsense.

                            Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nik282000N This user is from outside of this forum
                            Nik282000
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Found the manager. Businesses pay employees as little as is legally possible in many cases while raking in huge profits.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            13
                            • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
                              • Invidious
                              • Youtube
                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              cyborganism
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              I think had we had a minority Conservative gouvernent with a strong NDP opposition, we would be in a much better situation.

                              I hate the conservatives but fuck the liberals for being dishonest hypocritical pieces of shit.

                              ComradeSharkfuckerS 1 Reply Last reply
                              20
                              • B bdot@lemmy.world

                                any time a government is trying to fast track a bill, every resident should be paying special attention; no matter their party of choice.

                                pretty crazy that this came from the Liberals

                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                NoneOfUrBusiness
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #17

                                pretty crazy that this came from the Liberals

                                Not really. Setting aside the obvious “liberalism is the precursor to fascism,” this is simply modern day colonialism, and when have liberals ever opposed colonialism?

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
                                  • Invidious
                                  • Youtube
                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  G This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grte@lemmy.ca
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #18

                                  The country got hoodwinked. So distracted by Poilievre that they snuck another Harper creature in to lead the Liberals.

                                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  12
                                  • T teppa

                                    Theyre literally paid out of the profits. You’re spouting nonsense.

                                    acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    acargitzT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    acargitz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #19

                                    Revenue and profits are not the same thing. If you’re going to abrasively assert stuff, at least don’t be wrong.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    6
                                    • recursive_recursion they/themR recursive_recursion they/them
                                      • Invidious
                                      • Youtube
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      R This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Rentlar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #20

                                      I’m upset that more deference to House MPs’ summer vacation was given in the Senate than the potential impact to our rights.

                                      I’m still cautiously optimistic about Bill C-5 (though Bill C-2 needs to either be scrapped or massively reworked IMO), since there could be bills to amend the laws again, or matters of discretion that come out of this summer’s consultation.

                                      The power is in the government now in law, but the civil and legal pushback will come depending on how forceful the government attempts to use this newly gained power.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      6
                                      • N NoneOfUrBusiness

                                        pretty crazy that this came from the Liberals

                                        Not really. Setting aside the obvious “liberalism is the precursor to fascism,” this is simply modern day colonialism, and when have liberals ever opposed colonialism?

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        bdot@lemmy.world
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #21

                                        good grief. you either have a DEEP misunderstanding of the words “liberalism” and “fascism” or you’re a troll.

                                        or perhaps a descendant of Mussolini?

                                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • G grte@lemmy.ca

                                          The country got hoodwinked. So distracted by Poilievre that they snuck another Harper creature in to lead the Liberals.

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          brax@sh.itjust.works
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #22

                                          I don’t think there was any distraction. We had two shit choices and NDP. And since this country fails to elect NDP time after time, it was a given that we were pretty fucked. The main difference during this election between the parties that I saw were:

                                          1. The Liberal platform didn’t contradict itself every point or two

                                          2. The Liberal platform focused a lot more on domestic tourism, accessibility, and making it easier to transport our own goods across provincial borders.

                                          I don’t see how bill C-5 fits into any of the platform they put forward.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          8

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post