Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
257 Posts 124 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M mathemachristian [he/him]

    First they came for the Communists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Communist

    Then they came for the Socialists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Socialist

    Then they came for the trade unionists
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a trade unionist

    Then they came for the Jews
    And I did not speak out
    Because I was not a Jew

    Then they came for me
    And there was no one left
    To speak out for me

    • Martin Niemöller

    Attacking communists is the first step. That’s where the line needs to be drawn. Not an inch to fascism.

    R This user is from outside of this forum
    R This user is from outside of this forum
    raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #105

    Yes, my opinion can be changed for Mexico, and it would be made in the moment.

    Frankly I wish our governments would more openly stand with one another. I would support it 100%

    By the way, the words Niemoller wrote refer to internal oppression and disenfranchisement. For any example of an external analogue in the same time period, consider UK agreement with Poland, that eventually pulled them into the war and which they courageously honored and defended. We don’t have such an agreement with Mexico.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • owenfromcanada@lemmy.caO owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca

      The world doesn’t need to go to war, it needs to stop being afraid of a major economic downturn.

      Stop everything with the US: trade, travel, everything. Deport all Americans back to their native soil. Isolate them, and see how quickly things change.

      While we’re at it, do the same with Russia and Israel. And maybe China?

      Would it cause a global economic crisis? Probably. But people are already dying—it’s worth it if we can actually end a genocide and a couple wars.

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      wonderingwanderer
      wrote last edited by
      #106

      Don’t deport americans. Some of us want to escape.

      1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

        Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

        As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

        THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

        Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

        MichaelM This user is from outside of this forum
        MichaelM This user is from outside of this forum
        Michael
        wrote last edited by m1ch431@slrpnk.net
        #107

        and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba

        Could you provide a source for this claim?

        1 F 2 Replies Last reply
        2
        • L lefantome@programming.dev

          So much this. Just 100% stop all trade with the United States. All of it. And zero travel. Then ban US travel to your country. Give them the isolation they crave.

          W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          wonderingwanderer
          wrote last edited by
          #108

          No, definitely impose sanctions and stop trade, but don’t ban travel. Let the brain drain do its thing.

          Some of us do not consent to the actions of this rogue administration, and we don’t crave isolation. Some of us desperately want a way out of this country.

          1 Reply Last reply
          14
          • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

            Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

            D This user is from outside of this forum
            D This user is from outside of this forum
            deiceamerica@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by deiceamerica@lemmy.world
            #109

            .

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S shaggyb@lemmy.world

              You don’t get it.

              The people posting shit like that WANT TO KILL.

              They are bloodthirsty. They are warmongers. They want a bodycount.

              There’s nothing more to realize about the joke because it’s not a joke.

              America is ruled by murderers.

              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              deiceamerica@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by deiceamerica@lemmy.world
              #110

              The only way it’s stops is when the blood lust they seek comes home to roost.

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              10
              • Z zorque@lemmy.world

                Most of the people in charge don’t have their value in USD, they have it in material and speculative value. The crash of the USD will hurt everyone but them.

                W This user is from outside of this forum
                W This user is from outside of this forum
                wonderingwanderer
                wrote last edited by
                #111

                Crashing the USD would be its demise as the global reserve currency, which would evaporate all that speculative value overnight.

                Sure, the oligarchs would still have their mansions, bunkers, and bullet-proof SUVs, but their primary source of leverage and influence would be gone. They would become irrelevant.

                1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • M misterd@lemmy.ca

                  Nah. Just start selling the US bonds that backs the US currency. The USD with crash in value.

                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                  wonderingwanderer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #112

                  This is the way.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MichaelM Michael

                    and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba

                    Could you provide a source for this claim?

                    1 This user is from outside of this forum
                    1 This user is from outside of this forum
                    100_kg_90_de_belin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #113

                    It’s the guys who were shitty owners of plantations ans lackeys of the US

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • W This user is from outside of this forum
                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      wonderingwanderer
                      wrote last edited by wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                      #114

                      How do you strike if you’re already unemployed? So many people are already losing their jobs to automation and AI.

                      Also, one of the most insidious aspects of american healthcare is that by tying it to employment, people become utterly dependent on their employers. They lose a lot of leverage.

                      How do you risk your livelihood when you have cancer or diabetes and your corporate benefits are the only way you can afford healthcare?

                      Not to mention, most of the american workforce is not unionized. How do you organize a strike without workers unions?

                      Plus, there is a precedent in recent history where congress can pass legislation making it illegal for workers to continue a strike. How that doesn’t qualify as forced labor, is beyond me.

                      So you see, there are many roadblocks to having an effective strike in the US, especially when the american system has been designed over the decades and centuries specifically to advance and protect the interests of the wealthy elite.

                      It’s not about making excuses, it’s about acknowledging the practical realities that get in the way of progress.

                      B 1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

                        Americans know. They just don’t have any idea what to do, and no single person can solve the problem.

                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        K This user is from outside of this forum
                        kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #115

                        and no single person can solve the problem.

                        That’s a big part of their problem. They keep thinking about individual actions instead of coming together and acting as a group toward a common goal.

                        V B S 3 Replies Last reply
                        8
                        • H hugenerd@lemmy.ca

                          And do what? Send the First Mounted Pellet Rifle brigade down there?

                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                          canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
                          wrote last edited by canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
                          #116

                          If Greenland was actually invaded, it’s part of the EU in all but name, and the whole EU would now be at war with the US. Even if we have no treaty (outside of now-completely dead NATO) and don’t join in, the US probably invades us to make sure, ala Iceland in WWII.

                          I guess there’s a possibility Denmark cuts and runs. In that case yeah, there’s probably nothing we can do.

                          If we were invaded and had a treaty with Denmark, the US would be at war with Denmark and hopefully the WWI cascading treaties thing would kick in and, again, the US would be at war with the EU. And probably the UK too since they have proximity to both the EU, and us through our sovereign - ignoring one is possible, but both seems like a tall order.

                          Of course, the goal is to deter invasion in the first place.

                          niquarl@lemmy.mlN 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • F freshparsnip@lemmy.ca

                            I wish the midterms were overwith so people could stop hoping for that. But then it might be too late to do anything else

                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #117

                            I wish the midterms were overwith so people could stop hoping for that

                            They’ll just place their desperate hopes on something else.

                            Anything to avoid having to actually do something themselves.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • B bagsy@lemmy.world

                              And you think action will be easier if you wait longer? You are wrong, things are only going to get more difficult.

                              Facism is a cancer. You cant ignore it or reason with it, or hope it goes away. The only option is to take the terrible medicine and fight, now.

                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              wonderingwanderer
                              wrote last edited by
                              #118

                              Some cancers are terminal/inoperable…

                              B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Z zephorah@discuss.online

                                There are many who actually believe the midterms will solve this.

                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                W This user is from outside of this forum
                                wonderingwanderer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #119

                                What other options do you propose?

                                I’m aware the midterms aren’t failsafe, but they’re the closest thing to hope that we have.

                                And if people make the same mistake as last time by boycotting the vote, then their defeatism will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

                                heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH Z 2 Replies Last reply
                                4
                                • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                  Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  collapse_already@lemmy.ml
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #120

                                  The only way this makes sense is if she is talking about America. I say that as an American.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T turdas@suppo.fi

                                    I’m not a Mao fan I just think it’s a funny image (and unfortunately topical in today’s world).

                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                                    canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #121

                                    “Just joking bro”

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • R rarsamx@lemmy.ca

                                      Venezuela should have been the line. Want to make it Greenland? So, they can take mexico, Cuba?

                                      Each inch they take is too much. They have proven that they are following the Fascist guidebook.

                                      Venezuela is the first step. Same as Hitler with Poland.

                                      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #122

                                      Poland was the last step, which is what started WWII. I think you mean Czechoslovakia (or maybe the Rhineland) was the first step.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      20
                                      • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                        Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

                                        As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

                                        THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

                                        Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

                                        spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #123

                                        Why would you term Greenland a protectorate? It’s the territory of an ally.

                                        It saddens me that Americans seem to be incapable of understanding even the concept of an ally.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                          Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

                                          As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

                                          THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

                                          Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rarsamx@lemmy.ca
                                          wrote last edited by rarsamx@lemmy.ca
                                          #124

                                          I am Mexican Canadian.

                                          Mexico hasn’t forgotten about all the stolen territory. Yes, they call it sale and secession and whatever, it was stolen.

                                          If I put a gun to your head and ask you to sell me a property you have for $10. You are going to do it. I’d say I purchased it. I’m sure you’ll say I stole it.

                                          So, why do disagree?

                                          Because of the wise reflection of “first they came for the…”

                                          Well. If we don’t stand against them taking over Venezuela, who is going to stand with us when they try to take over us (Greenland, Canada, Mexico and the rest)

                                          The manifest Destiny is no joke.

                                          R G 2 Replies Last reply
                                          12

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post