Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

When will America realize that this is not a joke. They'll be laughing right up to the goosestepping.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
257 Posts 124 Posters 9 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z zorque@lemmy.world

    Most of the people in charge don’t have their value in USD, they have it in material and speculative value. The crash of the USD will hurt everyone but them.

    W This user is from outside of this forum
    W This user is from outside of this forum
    wonderingwanderer
    wrote last edited by
    #111

    Crashing the USD would be its demise as the global reserve currency, which would evaporate all that speculative value overnight.

    Sure, the oligarchs would still have their mansions, bunkers, and bullet-proof SUVs, but their primary source of leverage and influence would be gone. They would become irrelevant.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • M misterd@lemmy.ca

      Nah. Just start selling the US bonds that backs the US currency. The USD with crash in value.

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      wonderingwanderer
      wrote last edited by
      #112

      This is the way.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MichaelM Michael

        and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba

        Could you provide a source for this claim?

        1 This user is from outside of this forum
        1 This user is from outside of this forum
        100_kg_90_de_belin
        wrote last edited by
        #113

        It’s the guys who were shitty owners of plantations ans lackeys of the US

        1 Reply Last reply
        8
        • W This user is from outside of this forum
          W This user is from outside of this forum
          wonderingwanderer
          wrote last edited by wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          #114

          How do you strike if you’re already unemployed? So many people are already losing their jobs to automation and AI.

          Also, one of the most insidious aspects of american healthcare is that by tying it to employment, people become utterly dependent on their employers. They lose a lot of leverage.

          How do you risk your livelihood when you have cancer or diabetes and your corporate benefits are the only way you can afford healthcare?

          Not to mention, most of the american workforce is not unionized. How do you organize a strike without workers unions?

          Plus, there is a precedent in recent history where congress can pass legislation making it illegal for workers to continue a strike. How that doesn’t qualify as forced labor, is beyond me.

          So you see, there are many roadblocks to having an effective strike in the US, especially when the american system has been designed over the decades and centuries specifically to advance and protect the interests of the wealthy elite.

          It’s not about making excuses, it’s about acknowledging the practical realities that get in the way of progress.

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • V velindora@lemmy.cafe

            Americans know. They just don’t have any idea what to do, and no single person can solve the problem.

            K This user is from outside of this forum
            K This user is from outside of this forum
            kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #115

            and no single person can solve the problem.

            That’s a big part of their problem. They keep thinking about individual actions instead of coming together and acting as a group toward a common goal.

            V B S 3 Replies Last reply
            8
            • H hugenerd@lemmy.ca

              And do what? Send the First Mounted Pellet Rifle brigade down there?

              C This user is from outside of this forum
              C This user is from outside of this forum
              canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
              wrote last edited by canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
              #116

              If Greenland was actually invaded, it’s part of the EU in all but name, and the whole EU would now be at war with the US. Even if we have no treaty (outside of now-completely dead NATO) and don’t join in, the US probably invades us to make sure, ala Iceland in WWII.

              I guess there’s a possibility Denmark cuts and runs. In that case yeah, there’s probably nothing we can do.

              If we were invaded and had a treaty with Denmark, the US would be at war with Denmark and hopefully the WWI cascading treaties thing would kick in and, again, the US would be at war with the EU. And probably the UK too since they have proximity to both the EU, and us through our sovereign - ignoring one is possible, but both seems like a tall order.

              Of course, the goal is to deter invasion in the first place.

              niquarl@lemmy.mlN 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • F freshparsnip@lemmy.ca

                I wish the midterms were overwith so people could stop hoping for that. But then it might be too late to do anything else

                K This user is from outside of this forum
                K This user is from outside of this forum
                kent_eh@lemmy.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #117

                I wish the midterms were overwith so people could stop hoping for that

                They’ll just place their desperate hopes on something else.

                Anything to avoid having to actually do something themselves.

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • B bagsy@lemmy.world

                  And you think action will be easier if you wait longer? You are wrong, things are only going to get more difficult.

                  Facism is a cancer. You cant ignore it or reason with it, or hope it goes away. The only option is to take the terrible medicine and fight, now.

                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                  wonderingwanderer
                  wrote last edited by
                  #118

                  Some cancers are terminal/inoperable…

                  B 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Z zephorah@discuss.online

                    There are many who actually believe the midterms will solve this.

                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    W This user is from outside of this forum
                    wonderingwanderer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #119

                    What other options do you propose?

                    I’m aware the midterms aren’t failsafe, but they’re the closest thing to hope that we have.

                    And if people make the same mistake as last time by boycotting the vote, then their defeatism will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

                    heythisisnttheymca@lemmy.worldH Z 2 Replies Last reply
                    4
                    • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                      Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      C This user is from outside of this forum
                      collapse_already@lemmy.ml
                      wrote last edited by
                      #120

                      The only way this makes sense is if she is talking about America. I say that as an American.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • T turdas@suppo.fi

                        I’m not a Mao fan I just think it’s a funny image (and unfortunately topical in today’s world).

                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        canadaplus@lemmy.sdf.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #121

                        “Just joking bro”

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • R rarsamx@lemmy.ca

                          Venezuela should have been the line. Want to make it Greenland? So, they can take mexico, Cuba?

                          Each inch they take is too much. They have proven that they are following the Fascist guidebook.

                          Venezuela is the first step. Same as Hitler with Poland.

                          spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                          spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #122

                          Poland was the last step, which is what started WWII. I think you mean Czechoslovakia (or maybe the Rhineland) was the first step.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          20
                          • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                            Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

                            As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

                            THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

                            Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

                            spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                            spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                            spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                            wrote last edited by
                            #123

                            Why would you term Greenland a protectorate? It’s the territory of an ally.

                            It saddens me that Americans seem to be incapable of understanding even the concept of an ally.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                              Greenland is arguably under NATO protection. Cuba is not, and there are in fact many groups of Cubans in the US who support an invasion of Cuba, I’m not going to get involved with that bullshit.

                              As for Mexico, I’m saddened by the lack of an informal alliance between the two countries. As much as I wish it weren’t so, I’ve not seen any indication from Mexico that they would stand with us. An invasion of Mexico would be an enormous step that would justify ramping up sanctioning behavior, but for me, as a Canadian, the line in the sand should be Greenland. Meaning if Greenland is ever directly attacked, we are in a war stance. We cut off everything to the US, sell all the Tbonds, nationalize all strategic resources (oil, media, telecom, water, hydro, food, potash, critical minerals), seize assists and nationalize all patents. I would recommend we also look for any alliance with China.

                              THAT’S what I mean by a line in the sand. We cut them off and dig in.

                              Edit… Hey if you disagree tell me why, stand up for yourself don’t just downvote and move on.

                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              R This user is from outside of this forum
                              rarsamx@lemmy.ca
                              wrote last edited by rarsamx@lemmy.ca
                              #124

                              I am Mexican Canadian.

                              Mexico hasn’t forgotten about all the stolen territory. Yes, they call it sale and secession and whatever, it was stolen.

                              If I put a gun to your head and ask you to sell me a property you have for $10. You are going to do it. I’d say I purchased it. I’m sure you’ll say I stole it.

                              So, why do disagree?

                              Because of the wise reflection of “first they came for the…”

                              Well. If we don’t stand against them taking over Venezuela, who is going to stand with us when they try to take over us (Greenland, Canada, Mexico and the rest)

                              The manifest Destiny is no joke.

                              R G 2 Replies Last reply
                              12
                              • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                I’m not sure about this. They’ve got a more than capable military.

                                But I’m willing to find out where their limit is. Militarily, I suspect it starts at a protracted war of attrition with a determined enemy that looks exactly like them and who pops in and out of unassailable and impassable northern boreal forests and muskeg swamps. Or hides in plain sight in the middle of Toronto. Or hops over the immense border to wreak havoc. No one would be safe, ever.

                                Economically, I think cutting off hydro, oil and potash would have an enormous effect on their comfort level. For lasting damage, nationalize all strategic resources and seize assets and companies. Raze them if threatened, starting with US assets. Nationalize all IP and patents. Sell all US government debt and send the interest rates sky high.

                                The weakness the US has is that they are doing this for more power and a comfortable life. They AIM to survive it. Frankly at a certain point I don’t care about that. Our fight is existential, and we have given up on a vision of life after. What matters at that point is the here and now, and that’s it.

                                spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                spacecowboy@lemmy.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #125

                                The biggest weakness of the US is that Americans hate one another. At the current time another civil war in the US isn’t in my best interests. But future events might change that.

                                Also, I don’t want to fight Americans in the streets of Toronto. I would be willing to fight Americans in the streets of American cities tho. The American concept of war is something that happens “over there”. How would Americans handle it if war wasn’t just some drone video of a boat in the Caribbean getting hit by a missile?

                                Hopefully it won’t come to that. But people obsess over troop counts a little too much and don’t think at all about the weakness inherent in American culture. That weakness obviously led to Trump and the general decline of the US. That decline can be either mitigated or exploited. We’ll just have to see how it goes.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • D deiceamerica@lemmy.world

                                  The only way it’s stops is when the blood lust they seek comes home to roost.

                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  T This user is from outside of this forum
                                  teppichbrand@feddit.org
                                  wrote last edited by teppichbrand@feddit.org
                                  #126

                                  Covid didn’t stop them when it was already in their homes destroying their lungs. This cult scares me, you can’t fight the insanity, it makes them stronger if you do. What do we do?

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                    Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                                    DylanMc6 [any, any]D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    DylanMc6 [any, any]D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    DylanMc6 [any, any]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #127

                                    We need socialism

                                    C P 2 Replies Last reply
                                    12
                                    • R raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca

                                      Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      oshaghennessey@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #128

                                      We know it’s not a joke. The three most populated cities in the US are in deep blue states and full of people who don’t want this. For everyone in those cities, it would take days and hundreds, if not thousands of dollars, to travel to the White House. Most of us are behind on rent, have had our cars repossessed, don’t make a living wage, don’t have healthcare, and have unsustainable credit card debt.

                                      Outside of a very vocal minority, the American people are overwhelmingly united around the fact that we don’t want this to happen.

                                      However, the American people aren’t in control of the American government, and the American government are overwhelmingly united around corporate interests.

                                      T M 2 Replies Last reply
                                      34
                                      • spacecowboy@lemmy.caS spacecowboy@lemmy.ca

                                        Why would you term Greenland a protectorate? It’s the territory of an ally.

                                        It saddens me that Americans seem to be incapable of understanding even the concept of an ally.

                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raskolnikovsaxe@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #129

                                        I meant that it is under the NATO umbrella. I have no interest, and I would not support, any Canadian involvement in Greenland beyond our help and support in the face of American aggression.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • K kent_eh@lemmy.ca

                                          and no single person can solve the problem.

                                          That’s a big part of their problem. They keep thinking about individual actions instead of coming together and acting as a group toward a common goal.

                                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                                          velindora@lemmy.cafe
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #130

                                          Yeah well we had “No Kings” and people came together, yet nothing happened. A few million people showed up and then went home.

                                          K W 2 Replies Last reply
                                          2

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post