Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Admin of todon.nl suggests, and rightly so, that the default/flagship Mastodon instance (isn’t decentralisation great?) be moved to a more neutral jurisdiction than Germany:

Admin of todon.nl suggests, and rightly so, that the default/flagship Mastodon instance (isn’t decentralisation great?) be moved to a more neutral jurisdiction than Germany:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
fediversemastosonmastodonsocialtodonnlgermany
3 Posts 2 Posters 23 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Aral BalkanA This user is from outside of this forum
    Aral BalkanA This user is from outside of this forum
    Aral Balkan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Admin of todon.nl suggests, and rightly so, that the default/flagship Mastodon instance (isn’t decentralisation great?) be moved to a more neutral jurisdiction than Germany:

    “Herewith the urgent request to move the Mastodon server presented to new users as the default (mastodon.social) to a more neutral jurisdiction (e.g. Switzerland). An alternative is to set up a new Mastodon server in a more neutral jurisdiction, which can then serve as a new flagship server.

    The trigger for this is the regular negative moderation of people who speak out against the largest and bloodiest genocide of our time, the one in Palestine. In particular they use (or abuse, how you want to look at it) of a German law that seeks to counter so-called Holocaust reversal. With hiding behind this law, the moderators of mastodon.social (and especially its owner) are also unwittingly sitting in the chair of the (German) judge.

    Apart from the fact that one local law should not affect the entire Mastodon project, the question is whether this law and the concept of Holocaust reversal are legally tenable in an international context.”

    Link Preview Image
    Move the Mastodon flagship to a more neutral jurisdiction · mastodon/mastodon · Discussion #34747

    Move the Mastodon flagship to a more neutral jurisdiction

    favicon

    GitHub (github.com)

    Mastodon mod closes the ticket after stating “There is no current plan to make changes to the Mastodon instances operated by Mastodon gGmbH. People are free to choose any Mastodon server when signing up for the platform.”

    And this (see screenshot) is what that “choice” looks like.

    This decentralisation anti-pattern – along with the fact that they didn’t close registrations after hitting a certain size to create a social precedent and allow distribution to other servers (as I advised Eugen to do back in the day) – is why there is a flagship instance to begin with when it’s an absolute contradiction of terms in a system that purports to be decentralised.

    #fediverse #mastoson #mastodonSocial #todonNL #Germany #israel #genocide #ethnicCleansing #apartheid #settlerColonialism #Palestine #Gaza

    stux⚡S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Aral BalkanA Aral Balkan

      Admin of todon.nl suggests, and rightly so, that the default/flagship Mastodon instance (isn’t decentralisation great?) be moved to a more neutral jurisdiction than Germany:

      “Herewith the urgent request to move the Mastodon server presented to new users as the default (mastodon.social) to a more neutral jurisdiction (e.g. Switzerland). An alternative is to set up a new Mastodon server in a more neutral jurisdiction, which can then serve as a new flagship server.

      The trigger for this is the regular negative moderation of people who speak out against the largest and bloodiest genocide of our time, the one in Palestine. In particular they use (or abuse, how you want to look at it) of a German law that seeks to counter so-called Holocaust reversal. With hiding behind this law, the moderators of mastodon.social (and especially its owner) are also unwittingly sitting in the chair of the (German) judge.

      Apart from the fact that one local law should not affect the entire Mastodon project, the question is whether this law and the concept of Holocaust reversal are legally tenable in an international context.”

      Link Preview Image
      Move the Mastodon flagship to a more neutral jurisdiction · mastodon/mastodon · Discussion #34747

      Move the Mastodon flagship to a more neutral jurisdiction

      favicon

      GitHub (github.com)

      Mastodon mod closes the ticket after stating “There is no current plan to make changes to the Mastodon instances operated by Mastodon gGmbH. People are free to choose any Mastodon server when signing up for the platform.”

      And this (see screenshot) is what that “choice” looks like.

      This decentralisation anti-pattern – along with the fact that they didn’t close registrations after hitting a certain size to create a social precedent and allow distribution to other servers (as I advised Eugen to do back in the day) – is why there is a flagship instance to begin with when it’s an absolute contradiction of terms in a system that purports to be decentralised.

      #fediverse #mastoson #mastodonSocial #todonNL #Germany #israel #genocide #ethnicCleansing #apartheid #settlerColonialism #Palestine #Gaza

      stux⚡S This user is from outside of this forum
      stux⚡S This user is from outside of this forum
      stux⚡
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @aral I brought up this thing before

      We are just "another server" with an almost grayed out button and we noticed big time in sign ups the past time

      Look at the MAU on .social and ours for example, while our instance is 3rd or 4th most busy

      I understand people need a reliable home but it kinda says we are not

      stux⚡S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • stux⚡S stux⚡

        @aral I brought up this thing before

        We are just "another server" with an almost grayed out button and we noticed big time in sign ups the past time

        Look at the MAU on .social and ours for example, while our instance is 3rd or 4th most busy

        I understand people need a reliable home but it kinda says we are not

        stux⚡S This user is from outside of this forum
        stux⚡S This user is from outside of this forum
        stux⚡
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @aral My suggestion for the "quick pick" list, aka a trustable server list would be an extra moderated server list for example and just pick random or in order from that instead of defaulting to .social

        For the more extensive list people can always check, but it seems like an improvement already

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post