Oh great, a contrarian. “Every time someone replies to me, it necessarily must be an attack that I need to squash with full force.”

An awesome character trait.

The original point you were answering to was: A coin has 3 sides, because there are 3 potential areas where a coin can land.

Your point was: Only that it can land on an area doesn’t mean that that point is a side (as in a side that counts as a result).

I said: Yes, even on a die there are areas where the die can stand that are not counted as sides.

Now the question to you, mister contrarian: How was that a flaw to your argument? Please tell me, how a thinking human being that can read can seriously interpret that as me pointing out a flaw to your argument?

I hate small ego contrarians who feel the need to constantly find attacks from all sides and if they don’t find them, they make them up.

It’s the online equivalent of a teenager going “What are you looking at?”

a two sided die is called a coin

a two sided die is called a coin

how dare you agree with them!!

Fuck caltrop d4s, all my homies hate caltrop d4s (it’s me, I’m all the homies)

An ideal coin is perfectly flat with no thickness.

Sir, what who describe looks more like a piece of paper than a coin.

Ideal coins are inflexible.

Ok, so a thin layer of adamantium is an ideal coin, but not a tiny disk of metallic alloy engraved with pictures, texts and values !

congrats on getting the joke