Married men three times more likely to be obese than unmarried men, says study
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 29 days ago last edited by
It is only three times more, because they count the unmarried men in relationship. Versus single men i bet the probability is >x10.
-
I'm using "wog" as a direct translation to Portuguese "carcamano" (Italian descendant, mildly derogative). It's directed towards my own group so I'm outright reclaiming it.
wrote 29 days ago last edited byLearn something new every day, thanks for sharing the context
-
I'm using "wog" as a direct translation to Portuguese "carcamano" (Italian descendant, mildly derogative). It's directed towards my own group so I'm outright reclaiming it.
wrote 29 days ago last edited byIn Australia it's an acceptable term, eg the movie "The Wog Boy". In London it's akin n to the n-word and not appropriate, I think London uses it as an abbreviation of golliwog, those racist dolls.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 29 days ago last edited by
The guy in the picture does not look obese to me, just overweight
-
Yeah, this is currently my problem. We don’t have anyone to help take care of the children. I cannot exercise if I don’t wake up at like 4am (all the gums are closed) and ride my bike. This takes a toll on me however.
wrote 29 days ago last edited byYou cannot excercise your way to weightloss without also make serious diet changes.
-
Can confirm. Separated a year ago. I'm down 90lbs
wrote 29 days ago last edited byShe only weighed 90lbs?!
-
wrote 29 days ago last edited by
They have a lot of calories
-
wrote 29 days ago last edited by
The thing is that I am eating very little. I am also almost in my 40s so my metabolism has started to slow down.
-
wrote 29 days ago last edited by
Lmao, meant gyms. Freaken swipe keyboard.
-
Is this correlation related to marriage specifically or can it also be observed in long-term, stable, cohabiting relationships?
In either case, what does this suggest?wrote 29 days ago last edited byThat people presented with food are unable to regulate the amount they eat in a healthy way.
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Coincidentally when we met in highschool we were both toothpicks and she was 90lbs and I was like 115lbs.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Where is the source data for this article? It doesn’t seem to have any associated research document in its contents
-
"The fuck is a wog"
does internet search
"okay cool English specific term for darker colored foreigner ethnicity people but apparently its a derogatory racial slur so why would someone identify themselves as one?"
Serious question by the way, is that like your cultures version of "we've appropriated a word you used to insult our kind and now pridefully incorporate it as a positive association into our minority culture and theres nothing you racist squares can do about it" or am I missing something?
wrote 28 days ago last edited byits a derogatory racial slur so why would someone identify themselves as one?"
Reclaiming slurs is cool. Less power to those who would use them against us. One of the reasons I don't agree with the trend of constantly moving towards whatever the politically correct language of the day is. We're just handing more insults to the assholes.
See https://sh.itjust.works/post/31758327 for related discussion
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 28 days ago last edited by
When we stop fucking, but keep eating, our bodies have to do something.
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Perhaps you did not read their username!
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Why do the unmarrieds be more obese then?
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
They are not. They are apparently much less likely to be obese.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote 28 days ago last edited by
Fishermen return with less bait than they sailed out to sea with. News at 11
-
wrote 28 days ago last edited by
people always say this but like, do you just think 50kg of fat is the same thing as 50kg of muscle?