Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What the actual fuck.

What the actual fuck.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
177 Posts 130 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

    What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

    Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

    Link Preview Image
    SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

    In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

    favicon

    PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

    lord pthenq1P This user is from outside of this forum
    lord pthenq1P This user is from outside of this forum
    lord pthenq1
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @sundogplanets
    For the data centers.

    They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

    Earth will have a ring

    Ángela Stella MatutinaA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kwayk42K kwayk42

      @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

      Doug WadeD This user is from outside of this forum
      Doug WadeD This user is from outside of this forum
      Doug Wade
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

      kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • CarolynC Carolyn

        @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

        EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
        EyeG This user is from outside of this forum
        Eye
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @CStamp @sundogplanets

        This!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Doug WadeD Doug Wade

          @kwayk42 @sundogplanets I love the enthusiasm but that would be speed running Kessler syndrome

          kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
          kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
          kwayk42
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

          At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

          SpycrabS GhostOnTheHalfShellG 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

            What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

            Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

            Link Preview Image
            SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

            In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

            favicon

            PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

            SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
            SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
            Spycrab
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @sundogplanets need more deorbit star link propaganda

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

              Link Preview Image
              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

              favicon

              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

              mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
              mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
              mkj
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

              Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

              I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

              mkjM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                Kiloku - Secretário do CaosK This user is from outside of this forum
                Kiloku - Secretário do CaosK This user is from outside of this forum
                Kiloku - Secretário do Caos
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @sundogplanets not that it matters, but it also wouldn't budge a thing in the kardashev scale, as it's supposed to measure how much power civilization can harness, and they certainly would pale in comparison to the total amount of earth based computing power, not to mention all the power used in non-computing usage

                Michael BuschM Legit_SpaghettiL 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • kwayk42K kwayk42

                  @dougwade @sundogplanets so... I should design incendiary rounds is what you're saying?

                  At this point the only way out is through, unless someone wants to build giant nets to try and clean up space debris

                  SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                  SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                  Spycrab
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                  kwayk42K 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • kwayk42K kwayk42

                    @sundogplanets that's it... Imma build a rail gun that can shoot down those satellites

                    mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mkj
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @kwayk42 Nudge one a kilometer off position and hello our old friend Kessler.

                    @sundogplanets

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SpycrabS Spycrab

                      @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets um actually, giant nets are a order of magnitude better idea that shooting satellites. Grapple arms and foam are also options. /srs

                      kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                      kwayk42K This user is from outside of this forum
                      kwayk42
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                      #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                      🍋 Superball ☀️S SpycrabS S 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • lord pthenq1P lord pthenq1

                        @sundogplanets
                        For the data centers.

                        They will orbit in the sunrise line (I don't know how to call it) between 509 km and the sector where there's enough radiation to be unworthy.

                        Earth will have a ring

                        Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ángela Stella MatutinaA This user is from outside of this forum
                        Ángela Stella Matutina
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @pthenq1 @sundogplanets

                        The sunrise/sunset line is the terminator. So, Sun-synchronous (i.e., passes every day at the same local solar time) LEO on the plane of the terminator.

                        Whatever it's called, it's a horrible idea. Want a ringed planet, you know where to find it. One of these days they will come up with a clever (?) plan to dismantle the Moon to give old Earth a ring too... until the rocks start colliding with each other and decaying into our atmosphere.

                        MycotropicM 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mkjM mkj

                          @sundogplanets One… million… satellites!? 🤯

                          Even ignoring all the *other* issues…

                          I imagine those wouldn't exactly be tiny cubesats. So how does 30 per launch sound? Build enough of those satellites and launchers to maintain a launch cadence of one launch per day, and that kind of a constellation is *90 years off* per my calculator. Assuming no failed launches and no failures in-orbit and no replacements needed for that time, naturally. And they'll cram all that into sun-synch orbits? WTAF?

                          mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mkjM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mkj
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          I really can't help but feel that someone, somewhere, saw the term "megaconstellation" and said "let's have an *actual* mega-constellation!"

                          @sundogplanets

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                            "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                            THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                            RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:R This user is from outside of this forum
                            RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:R This user is from outside of this forum
                            RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @sundogplanets I would ask if you were fucking serious and why the FCC hasn't thrown it out, but calling the people left there "clownshoes" is an unforgivable insult to the footwear of professional entertainers.

                            Also, worth noting, that isn't even fucking *ZERO* on the Kardashev because that's not even a goddamn relevant scale. Please somebody start fucking executing these techbro oligarchs to save the rest of us.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                              What the actual fuck. It's not April Fools Day, right? This is real?! Fuck you, SpaceX. Maybe this will help regulators realize how fucking shortsighted companies' plans in orbit are?

                              Surely the FCC won't rubber-stamp-approve this one??... ONE MILLION STARLINKS FUUUUCCCKKKKKK

                              Link Preview Image
                              SpaceX Eyes 1 Million Satellites for Orbital Data Center Push

                              In a late Friday FCC filing, the company mentions deploying a staggering 'one million satellites' in orbits ranging from 500 kilometers to 2,000km.

                              favicon

                              PCMag Australia (au.pcmag.com)

                              Hugh FergusonH This user is from outside of this forum
                              Hugh FergusonH This user is from outside of this forum
                              Hugh Ferguson
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @sundogplanets at this number of satellites, we're in the domain where the Russians and Chinese might start shooting them down as they would take up orbital real estate for their own networks to compete with Starlink

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kwayk42K kwayk42

                                @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                🍋 Superball ☀️S This user is from outside of this forum
                                🍋 Superball ☀️S This user is from outside of this forum
                                🍋 Superball ☀️
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @kwayk42 🤭🤍

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                  "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                  THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                  schrotthaufenS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  schrotthaufenS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  schrotthaufen
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                  John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F RiaResistsR 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • schrotthaufenS schrotthaufen

                                    @sundogplanets They will absolutely rubber stamp it. The orange dictator will see to it.

                                    John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F This user is from outside of this forum
                                    John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿F This user is from outside of this forum
                                    John Faithfull 🌍🇪🇺🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🧡✊🏻✊🏿
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @schrotthaufen @sundogplanets 😭🤬

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CarolynC Carolyn

                                      @sundogplanets The FCC is corrupt. What I don’t understand is how US gets to decide this for the world. 😞

                                      DaveyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      DaveyD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Davey
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @CStamp @sundogplanets

                                      "Because FUCK the rest of the world" - USA

                                      (Always has been)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kwayk42K kwayk42

                                        @spycrab @dougwade @sundogplanets but I can still shoot them once they're caught in a net though right?

                                        #JustWannaBuildARailgun

                                        SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        SpycrabS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Spycrab
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @kwayk42 @dougwade @sundogplanets if you shoot them they become a hazard for everything up there.

                                        What's worse than a million starlinks
                                        Several billion in trackable small starlinks

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Prof. Sam LawlerS Prof. Sam Lawler

                                          "Launching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev II-level situation"

                                          THIS IS IN AN FCC FILING NOT A SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK I'M DEAD

                                          Prof. Sam LawlerS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Prof. Sam LawlerS This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Prof. Sam Lawler
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          I feel like this is a good time for everyone to go read "More Everything Forever" by @adambecker.bsky.social because that completely unrealistic and awful techbro mentality/religion the only way to explain this FCC filing (and that book explains this very clearly!)

                                          Time to go outside and listen to NZ birds as the sun comes up, because fuck SpaceX.

                                          EyeG Mariya DelanoM Mark Reeves 📚 🎸H PalmAndNeedleP Isaac Ji KuoI 6 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post