ai, didn't read.brilliant.
-
@Mimesatwork @gbargoud @PeachMcD step one, don't assume ill intent. Politely let people know if they are boosting AI.
Be nice though!
After that, yeah, time to hide the boosts.
@renwillis @gbargoud @PeachMcD The problem I run into most these days though is that I can't 100% tell if something is AI if it's not the basic Computer Graphic Average From 2015 style.
There was this old painting meme going around a few days ago I just couldn't get a proper read on. I couldn't find an original and the image had certifiably been online for only few weeks. -
@renwillis @gbargoud @PeachMcD The problem I run into most these days though is that I can't 100% tell if something is AI if it's not the basic Computer Graphic Average From 2015 style.
There was this old painting meme going around a few days ago I just couldn't get a proper read on. I couldn't find an original and the image had certifiably been online for only few weeks.@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
If it was the hippo farting fire one, the actual artist was eventually found and posted there.
-
@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
If it was the hippo farting fire one, the actual artist was eventually found and posted there.
@gbargoud @renwillis @PeachMcD LOL it wasn't but god you have to link me to that one I'm begging you

It's this one (I'm not up on my art history so I can't investigate based on that). I saved the image to try edge detect, but obviously if the quality is poor enough to start with, it's not going to be conclusive

-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant. -
@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
If it was the hippo farting fire one, the actual artist was eventually found and posted there.
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@cR0w/116046831070586389
@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
That was a difficult one because the quality was too high to be AI art but the subject matter was truly ridiculous in the best ways
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis@mstdn.social ngl, this sounds like one of the few things that would be good to bring over from Threads.
-
RE: https://infosec.exchange/@cR0w/116046831070586389
@Mimesatwork @renwillis @PeachMcD
That was a difficult one because the quality was too high to be AI art but the subject matter was truly ridiculous in the best ways
@gbargoud @renwillis @PeachMcD That's truly amazing! Thank you! This is what the internet is really about
-
@gbargoud @renwillis @PeachMcD LOL it wasn't but god you have to link me to that one I'm begging you

It's this one (I'm not up on my art history so I can't investigate based on that). I saved the image to try edge detect, but obviously if the quality is poor enough to start with, it's not going to be conclusive

I see a "I louvre art memes" watermark on it which could be a good place to investigate.
I think it's probably legit, putting text on an existing painting is so much easier than getting an AI generation of a painting that looks good/consistent and I expect the person who made it took the lower effort route
-
I see a "I louvre art memes" watermark on it which could be a good place to investigate.
I think it's probably legit, putting text on an existing painting is so much easier than getting an AI generation of a painting that looks good/consistent and I expect the person who made it took the lower effort route
@gbargoud Yeah I tried looking for that and only came up with a FB group that's either a closed or no longer exists. And I would totally agree that just taking an actual painting would be the easiest, but the fact that I couldn't find anything online (I wanted to credit the original painting) just got my AI-senses tingling
Tbf, as time goes on, the worse my ai-sense gets
-
ai, didn't read.
brilliant.@renwillis @mhoye I always parsed "tldr" as "too long died reading", so this would be "AI; died reading" for me.
And yeah. It works.
-
C Cactuar Joe shared this topic
