Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. To the #VoteBlue people in the USA: Yes, voting for the #Democrats _is_ necessary in all upcoming elections.

To the #VoteBlue people in the USA: Yes, voting for the #Democrats _is_ necessary in all upcoming elections.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
votebluedemocrats
33 Posts 9 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

    @admin @juergen_hubert

    and how do you change that?

    you show the fuck up and vote

    a change of leadership means a change of policy

    what does not voting lead to?

    more of the same

    stop setting roadblocks in your mind before you participate

    participate, participate, participate

    that is the only way to get the change we need

    meanwhile, people just sitting things out until the democratic establishment magically changes is a fucking joke. lack of participation is *exactly* why things suck

    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
    SlightlyCyberpunk
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @benroyce @juergen_hubert How? Are you saying to break into the DNC and steal the ballots or something? WE DON'T GET TO VOTE ON THIS!

    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

      @benroyce @juergen_hubert How? Are you saying to break into the DNC and steal the ballots or something? WE DON'T GET TO VOTE ON THIS!

      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @admin @juergen_hubert

      OMFG WE'RE DOOMED FOR ETERNITY WE HAVE NO AGENCY

      πŸ˜‚

      you vote. you replace the leadership. you change the policy

      hello?

      will you stop fucking hiding and buried in deranged fears? it's fucking weak and embarrassing. part of the reason we're here is people who think just like you. fight, motherfucker

      did you learn nothing from mamdani's run?

      and how do we get more mamdanis?

      via my words here

      meanwhile your way is defeat, because you won't fucking fight!

      SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

        @admin @juergen_hubert

        OMFG WE'RE DOOMED FOR ETERNITY WE HAVE NO AGENCY

        πŸ˜‚

        you vote. you replace the leadership. you change the policy

        hello?

        will you stop fucking hiding and buried in deranged fears? it's fucking weak and embarrassing. part of the reason we're here is people who think just like you. fight, motherfucker

        did you learn nothing from mamdani's run?

        and how do we get more mamdanis?

        via my words here

        meanwhile your way is defeat, because you won't fucking fight!

        SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
        SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
        SlightlyCyberpunk
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @benroyce @juergen_hubert Mamdani isn't party leadership.

        Party leadership is elected by ~400 people who are chosen by party leadership. They pick their voters and they ain't picking you or me.

        Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

          @benroyce @juergen_hubert Mamdani isn't party leadership.

          Party leadership is elected by ~400 people who are chosen by party leadership. They pick their voters and they ain't picking you or me.

          Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
          Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
          Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @admin @juergen_hubert

          and who makes up party leadership deep thinker? what happens if we get 50 mamdanis? and how do we get 50 mamdanis?

          HELLO, ANYONE HOME?

          i'll give you some time to work through the fucking obvious and abandon your defense of cowardice

          your way is no more mamdanis. because integalactic omnipotent alien dem establishment we are powerless to change πŸ˜‚ fucking weak

          you are the problem

          SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

            @admin @juergen_hubert

            and who makes up party leadership deep thinker? what happens if we get 50 mamdanis? and how do we get 50 mamdanis?

            HELLO, ANYONE HOME?

            i'll give you some time to work through the fucking obvious and abandon your defense of cowardice

            your way is no more mamdanis. because integalactic omnipotent alien dem establishment we are powerless to change πŸ˜‚ fucking weak

            you are the problem

            SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
            SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
            SlightlyCyberpunk
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @benroyce @juergen_hubert Mamdani might not get a vote for party leadership either. Read the link I sent you earlier, it lists who gets a votes. There are three mayors selected so *maybe* he could get one of those, but it's not clear who chooses which three.

            But there's 200 people selected by the state party organizations, and 75 selected by national party leaders that aren't necessarily elected politicians at all.

            Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

              @benroyce @juergen_hubert Mamdani might not get a vote for party leadership either. Read the link I sent you earlier, it lists who gets a votes. There are three mayors selected so *maybe* he could get one of those, but it's not clear who chooses which three.

              But there's 200 people selected by the state party organizations, and 75 selected by national party leaders that aren't necessarily elected politicians at all.

              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @admin @juergen_hubert

              i completely understand you

              mental roadblock, mental roadblock, mental roadblock

              helplessness, weakness, cowardice, defeatism, pessimism, cynicism

              i get it

              thank you for painting a picture for everyone else reading along why the left is so FUCKED in this stupid fucking country

              you are the problem. you and all the other spineless turds out there are the author of our misery

              LISTEN TO ME:

              you vote

              in the primaries

              you get more mamdanis

              we win

              capisce?

              SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                @admin @juergen_hubert

                i completely understand you

                mental roadblock, mental roadblock, mental roadblock

                helplessness, weakness, cowardice, defeatism, pessimism, cynicism

                i get it

                thank you for painting a picture for everyone else reading along why the left is so FUCKED in this stupid fucking country

                you are the problem. you and all the other spineless turds out there are the author of our misery

                LISTEN TO ME:

                you vote

                in the primaries

                you get more mamdanis

                we win

                capisce?

                SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                SlightlyCyberpunk
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @benroyce @juergen_hubert And every single election election you have to fight against the party that's supposed to be supporting you -- just like Mamdani did -- because you have no way to change the party itself!

                If we can get these people elected as Democrats despite the Democrats fighting against us the entire way then we can certainly get them elected under a party that supports them or even just gets out of their way. AIUI Mamdani's campaign was largely run not by the Democratic party but by the fucking DSA. So maybe the DSA should form a party.

                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                  @benroyce @juergen_hubert And every single election election you have to fight against the party that's supposed to be supporting you -- just like Mamdani did -- because you have no way to change the party itself!

                  If we can get these people elected as Democrats despite the Democrats fighting against us the entire way then we can certainly get them elected under a party that supports them or even just gets out of their way. AIUI Mamdani's campaign was largely run not by the Democratic party but by the fucking DSA. So maybe the DSA should form a party.

                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @admin @juergen_hubert

                  you have to fight against the party to take over the party, absolutely

                  then once we control it, they support us

                  HELLO

                  are you trolling? what are you doing?

                  "So maybe the DSA should form a party"

                  oh yeah, divide the left vote in an FPTP voting system to guarantee 100 years of MAGA, real smart

                  no: the DSA *takes over the democratic party*

                  what is mamdani if not the beachhead for this winning strategy?

                  SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                    @admin @juergen_hubert

                    you have to fight against the party to take over the party, absolutely

                    then once we control it, they support us

                    HELLO

                    are you trolling? what are you doing?

                    "So maybe the DSA should form a party"

                    oh yeah, divide the left vote in an FPTP voting system to guarantee 100 years of MAGA, real smart

                    no: the DSA *takes over the democratic party*

                    what is mamdani if not the beachhead for this winning strategy?

                    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                    SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                    SlightlyCyberpunk
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @benroyce @juergen_hubert DSA *has* taken over the Democratic party at state levels. It doesn't work. The Democratic Party destroyed everything they could on the way out the door, leaving them to build a new party from scratch anyway, and then the national party and the wealthy donors built a new Democratic Party organization to oppose them.

                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                      @benroyce @juergen_hubert DSA *has* taken over the Democratic party at state levels. It doesn't work. The Democratic Party destroyed everything they could on the way out the door, leaving them to build a new party from scratch anyway, and then the national party and the wealthy donors built a new Democratic Party organization to oppose them.

                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                      Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      @admin @juergen_hubert

                      πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

                      i swear to god you have to be the most spineless whiny motherfucker i've met in a long time

                      yes: everything is hopeless, because enough people exist like you who are hopeless

                      do you have the faintest fucking perception in that head of yours that your piss poor attitude is a problem? have you ever heard of self-fulfilling prophecy?

                      you've given up before you've begun to fight. therefore you lose. absolutely, that is what will happen! because of your attitude

                      SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                        @admin @juergen_hubert

                        πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

                        i swear to god you have to be the most spineless whiny motherfucker i've met in a long time

                        yes: everything is hopeless, because enough people exist like you who are hopeless

                        do you have the faintest fucking perception in that head of yours that your piss poor attitude is a problem? have you ever heard of self-fulfilling prophecy?

                        you've given up before you've begun to fight. therefore you lose. absolutely, that is what will happen! because of your attitude

                        SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                        SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                        SlightlyCyberpunk
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @benroyce @juergen_hubert I got plenty of hope. Hope that we can actually change things. Hope that we can do something other than the same damn strategy that's been failing for decades already. You're the one that seems to be saying that the only option is to settle in and enjoy the status quo.

                        SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                          @benroyce @juergen_hubert I got plenty of hope. Hope that we can actually change things. Hope that we can do something other than the same damn strategy that's been failing for decades already. You're the one that seems to be saying that the only option is to settle in and enjoy the status quo.

                          SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                          SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                          SlightlyCyberpunk
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @benroyce @juergen_hubert My state has been voting for Democrats almost exclusively since the 80s. I must have missed the part where that fixed everything.

                          Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                            @benroyce @juergen_hubert My state has been voting for Democrats almost exclusively since the 80s. I must have missed the part where that fixed everything.

                            Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                            Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                            Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @admin @juergen_hubert

                            Then propose an alternative approach. We can't start a third party in our stupid fucking voting system. So we're stuck with having to take over the dems. Im not calling it easy. Im calling it our only way forward. And youre not helping. And why? Third party dreams in RI (i think you're in RI)? Would you excuse me if i said this focus of yours is rather immaterial to national concerns? Please scope your words to national concerns and not your goals in RI

                            SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                              @admin @juergen_hubert

                              Then propose an alternative approach. We can't start a third party in our stupid fucking voting system. So we're stuck with having to take over the dems. Im not calling it easy. Im calling it our only way forward. And youre not helping. And why? Third party dreams in RI (i think you're in RI)? Would you excuse me if i said this focus of yours is rather immaterial to national concerns? Please scope your words to national concerns and not your goals in RI

                              SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                              SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                              SlightlyCyberpunk
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @benroyce @juergen_hubert You can't go zero to national, doesn't matter if you're taking over the Dems or building something new. You start in the states you can change and you build from there. It's gonna take some time unfortunately. Should have started years ago, but second best time is now.

                              Dumping FPTP would be a great step too, there's efforts to do that as well in plenty of places, including here in RI.

                              Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                                @benroyce @juergen_hubert You can't go zero to national, doesn't matter if you're taking over the Dems or building something new. You start in the states you can change and you build from there. It's gonna take some time unfortunately. Should have started years ago, but second best time is now.

                                Dumping FPTP would be a great step too, there's efforts to do that as well in plenty of places, including here in RI.

                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                                Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @admin @juergen_hubert

                                and we'll get fptp dumped by voting people in who will get that done

                                we need *less* dreamers

                                more effective action

                                SlightlyCyberpunkA 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                                  @admin @juergen_hubert

                                  and we'll get fptp dumped by voting people in who will get that done

                                  we need *less* dreamers

                                  more effective action

                                  SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  SlightlyCyberpunkA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  SlightlyCyberpunk
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @benroyce @juergen_hubert No, you start where that isn't an issue until you've got the momentum to run for bigger shit. I'm not talking about running for President, we aren't gonna get anyone left of center in there by *any* strategy without doing a lot of work locally first.

                                  Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • SlightlyCyberpunkA SlightlyCyberpunk

                                    @benroyce @juergen_hubert No, you start where that isn't an issue until you've got the momentum to run for bigger shit. I'm not talking about running for President, we aren't gonna get anyone left of center in there by *any* strategy without doing a lot of work locally first.

                                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @admin @juergen_hubert

                                    then you support the mamdani model and you're with us

                                    because that's all i'm talking about

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦

                                      @juergen_hubert

                                      a focus on the dem estbmnt is a red herring

                                      of course they suck

                                      #mamdani showed us just show up and #vote for who we like. he got no support from the estbmnt, even hostility. now he's mayor

                                      because we voted!

                                      the dem estbmnt is not going to change. does it matter? why should we care?

                                      1. ignore them

                                      2. vote

                                      *especially #primaries #primaries2026*

                                      3. and replace them

                                      et voila

                                      voter anger is not the fault of #democrats

                                      the dems being shit is the fault of people not voting

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      slash
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                      My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                                      The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                                      Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                                      Alf No ProblemA Grassroots JoeJ Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A slash

                                        @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                        My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                                        The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                                        Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                                        Alf No ProblemA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Alf No ProblemA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        Alf No Problem
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @agreeable_landfall @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno
                                        Vote? Definitely!
                                        Doesn't make a difference.
                                        The rich buy politicians on both sides; no matter who gets elected, the rich get richer and I am poorer.
                                        Why are they spending money on elections? Cost of doing business. To maintain the farce so the oppressed do not revolt.
                                        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiTJ7Pz_59A
                                        James Talarico: "The culture wars are a smoke screen, because the real fight in this country is not Left versus Right; it's Top versus Bottom."

                                        Ben Royce πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A slash

                                          @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                          My take: You vote counts. If that were not true, why would they (both parties) spend so much time and money trying to stop you? They want a low turnout, because it's easier to tip an election that way.

                                          The solution is obvious: Vote. I will tell you now; I don't care *who* you vote for. Just as long as you vote.

                                          Want to do more? Volunteer to help folks get to the polls. Whatever gets the most people voting is how all this gets fixed.

                                          Grassroots JoeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Grassroots JoeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Grassroots Joe
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @agreeable_landfall

                                          Since when do both parties want to stop people from voting?

                                          @benroyce @juergen_hubert @cascheranno

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post