Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
  • Home
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Sketchy)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Wandering Adventure Party

  1. Home
  2. Canada
  3. Apparently Canadians are notorius cheaters in the sport of Curling

Apparently Canadians are notorius cheaters in the sport of Curling

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Canada
canada
157 Posts 90 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com

    Even worse not just to America but specifically New Jersey, undeniably the worst part of America

    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    lobut@lemmy.ca
    wrote on last edited by
    #52

    Even in the turn of the 31st century is it still not livable: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsqHEmMao8w

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
    • tomiantT tomiant

      Yes I am a violent drug addicted criminal, I don’t know maybe you’re a nice kid in school and wear shirts and stuff but around my hood we don’t.

      K This user is from outside of this forum
      K This user is from outside of this forum
      k0e3@lemmy.ca
      wrote on last edited by
      #53

      …but around my hood we don’t.

      Lol, this is so stupid. Why?

      tomiantT 1 Reply Last reply
      10
      • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

        Look, I find extending a finger to give the stone a boop after release completely baffling…but there’s no chance at all that it affected the trajectory of the thing. You might as well “cheat” by blowing on it.

        khannie@lemmy.worldK This user is from outside of this forum
        khannie@lemmy.worldK This user is from outside of this forum
        khannie@lemmy.world
        wrote on last edited by
        #54

        I think he thought the boop was going to do something. It was entirely deliberate. The guy clearly cheated.

        1 Reply Last reply
        10
        • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

          Having curled myself, I can assure you it does not…and if it did make a difference, it would almost certainly be negative, since you’re giving up any semblance of control that you had on the actual throw. There’s not going to be some “precision poke” that magically steers it where it needs to go. But don’t take my word for it.

          Does it make any difference?

          “No. The double-touching that I’ve seen has been incidental contact, and that’s fingers brushing or hand brushing on a 40-pound piece of granite,” said Eugene Hritzuk, a Canadian curler based in Saskatoon who has been involved in competitive curling and coaching for more than 60 years.

          “What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event? You need the palm on your hand against that stone to do anything.”

          Delivering a stone entails acute skills to slide on line and on pace, he said.

          Once sliding on target and at the right speed, releasing the stone and then touching it with any force would cause it to veer off its intended line and speed, Hritzuk said. “That would not be advantageous to good execution.”

          Canadian curling commentator John Cullen, who hosted the CBC podcast Broomgate: A Curling Scandal, said most top curlers will say that double-touching has no effect on the stone.

          As well, most top curlers will double-touch at times and don’t think it’s a foul, he said.

          “The idea that a top curler would let a rock go and then want to try to adjust it with their finger —it doesn’t seem like there’s any way you could get an advantage from that. It feels like it would be worse.”

          But as I said, the rules are the rules, and I don’t think it’s wrong to enforce them.

          BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
          BuelldozerB This user is from outside of this forum
          Buelldozer
          wrote on last edited by
          #55

          What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event?

          This is a fun little physics problem.

          The CoF of a curling stone on ice appears to be between .006 and .016 depending on fast its sliding.

          So with a CoF of .006 that 40lb chunk of granite has an effective weight of just four ounces relative to that same chunk of granite at a CoF of 1. With a CoF of .016 it’s relative weight is 9 ounces.

          So if the finger brush is in either the X or Y axis then basically anything more than what it takes to press a key on your keyboard will have an effect.

          Trying to stop the stone from rotating is a whole different matter because then you’re working against it’s stored inertia and that will be much much higher. No way to calculate that though unless you know it’s rate of spin.

          H 1 Reply Last reply
          23
          • G glide@lemmy.ca

            Because extreme cases can impact the rock. Barely touching the rock in the way caught on film realistically isn’t impacting the rock, but the rule needs to exist to prevent someone from actively pushing the rock after letting go.

            But again, these guys know better and have had the time and resources to train better.

            wraithgear@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
            wraithgear@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
            wraithgear@lemmy.world
            wrote on last edited by
            #56

            ok, but we are talking about a sport that is using brooms to micro melt the ice, and on a molecular level changing how the rotation changes the direction of this rock… someone touching the rock seems much more impactful

            G B 2 Replies Last reply
            44
            • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

              …if said billiard ball weighed 40 lbs.

              A little finger poke ain’t gonna do shit.

              But, the rules are the rules.

              wraithgear@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
              wraithgear@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
              wraithgear@lemmy.world
              wrote on last edited by
              #57

              the primary method of playing the game involves melting a microscopic layer of ice to alter the trajectory of the 40lbs rock….

              1 Reply Last reply
              12
              • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                Look, I find extending a finger to give the stone a boop after release completely baffling…but there’s no chance at all that it affected the trajectory of the thing. You might as well “cheat” by blowing on it.

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                sharkticon@lemmy.zip
                wrote on last edited by
                #58

                Accident? He’s done it multiple times. The women’s team did it too.

                Value SubtractedV 1 Reply Last reply
                7
                • S skozzii@lemmy.ca

                  And then there is this angle that shows he holds his finger beside the rock after release.

                  The “gotcha” photo has his finger buried internally in the rock, seeing this other angle shows his finger beside the rock, but from a different angle would appear to be touching it.

                  Not as clear cut as they want you to believe.

                  merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                  merc@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
                  merc@sh.itjust.works
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #59

                  There’s a middle ground between “completely innocent” and “massive cheats”. I think it’s possible that the Canadians have all trained in a technique where they release the rock and then point, and the Swedes use a different release technique. When the Canadians do it, it could lead to them sometimes accidentally brushing the rock with their fingers. If it happens it might mean that they broke the rules and that that rock should be removed (or whatever it is they do), but it doesn’t mean that they’re intentionally cheating.

                  It really looks like they’re poking the rock with their fingers, why else would they point like that? But, I’ve seen enough people talking about the biomechanics of sports that I know that sometimes something that seems dumb like pointing might just be how they ensure that their bodies are aligned exactly the same way every time. It’s like how the Olympic pistol shooters have this weird posture with their hands in their pockets.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  6
                  • S sharkticon@lemmy.zip

                    Accident? He’s done it multiple times. The women’s team did it too.

                    Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                    Value SubtractedV This user is from outside of this forum
                    Value Subtracted
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #60

                    Yeah, as the article I linked indicated, a lot of players simply don’t consider it an infraction, and therefore don’t give a damn whether they do it.

                    And for probably the fifth time, I have no problem with the rule being enforced.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • tomiantT tomiant

                      During the whole thing I was just picturing these curling nerds saying that shit to my face and how that’d go down lol.

                      skulblakaS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skulblakaS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skulblaka
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #61

                      and how that’d go down lol.

                      What, getting your ass beat half to death by Olympian athletes?

                      tomiantT 1 Reply Last reply
                      7
                      • Value SubtractedV Value Subtracted

                        The brooms affect the ice in front of the rock, which changes the rock’s behaviour as it moves over the swept patch. You have to exert quite a bit of force to push the rock directly.

                        And if it had no effect why do they do it?

                        Sometimes by accident, I’m sure. And probably more relevant, sometimes out of sheer laziness.

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        njm1314@lemmy.world
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #62

                        Alright. If you are gonna argue that was an accident then you just aren’t someone worth discussing things with. My god…

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • wraithgear@lemmy.worldW wraithgear@lemmy.world

                          ok, but we are talking about a sport that is using brooms to micro melt the ice, and on a molecular level changing how the rotation changes the direction of this rock… someone touching the rock seems much more impactful

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          glide@lemmy.ca
                          wrote on last edited by glide@lemmy.ca
                          #63

                          Fair enough. I realize now that I spoke with more confidence on the reality of the situation than I intended. Any avid curler I’ve spoken with regarding this in the last couple days swears up and down that the level of interaction that supposidly occurred between the curler and the rock is genuinely a non-factor. I do not know from any level of personal experience, hence why I stated that I trust whatever Olympic panel exists. I merely wanted to counter the poor argument that “the rule wouldn’t exist if it can’t impact the rock,” as the rule can absolutely exist for the purpose of more clear cut cases.

                          Armchair analysis is rarely worth taking seriously. I suspect that neither of us actually know from experience, but maybe you’re a professional curler.

                          M Z 2 Replies Last reply
                          18
                          • N njm1314@lemmy.world

                            Alright. If you are gonna argue that was an accident then you just aren’t someone worth discussing things with. My god…

                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            G This user is from outside of this forum
                            glide@lemmy.ca
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #64

                            Insinuating that everyone always performs perfectly at the Olympics? I just watched a woman cry because she only landed a double-spin instead of a triple during the figure skating competiton. I supposed she didn’t land her jump on purpose too?

                            Don’t get me wrong, I don’t believe he accidentally touched the rock, but I am shocked you find it so unbelievable that someone could be so focused on where their rock is going that they didn’t pay enough attention to how their hand was positioned after they let go of the rock. High pressure situations create surprising mistakes.

                            Value SubtractedV N 2 Replies Last reply
                            1
                            • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                              Even worse not just to America but specifically New Jersey, undeniably the worst part of America

                              G This user is from outside of this forum
                              G This user is from outside of this forum
                              gammelfisch@lemmy.world
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #65

                              Nope, send them to a Red Oblast after they are forced to watch the Deliverance.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.caL lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca

                                Of fuck that’s a war crime.

                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                S This user is from outside of this forum
                                sapphironza@sh.itjust.works
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #66

                                Its never a war crime the first time.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.comK kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                  Even worse not just to America but specifically New Jersey, undeniably the worst part of America

                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  w98bsod@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #67

                                  Hey, heys hey now.

                                  … yeah you’re probably right.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Z zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                                    cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7671573

                                    Sweden knew Canada’s Marc Kennedy was a notorious cheater.

                                    So they set up a camera at the ‘hog line’ to record it.

                                    And caught him doing it at the Olympics.

                                    tweto

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    tangonov@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #68

                                    You can’t cheat when it’s not a real sport 🤣

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    12
                                    • T tangonov@lemmy.ca

                                      You can’t cheat when it’s not a real sport 🤣

                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                                      tangonov@lemmy.ca
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #69

                                      I’m kidding guys relax

                                      H 1 Reply Last reply
                                      10
                                      • BuelldozerB Buelldozer

                                        What can fingers brushing against a 40-pound piece of granite do in any event?

                                        This is a fun little physics problem.

                                        The CoF of a curling stone on ice appears to be between .006 and .016 depending on fast its sliding.

                                        So with a CoF of .006 that 40lb chunk of granite has an effective weight of just four ounces relative to that same chunk of granite at a CoF of 1. With a CoF of .016 it’s relative weight is 9 ounces.

                                        So if the finger brush is in either the X or Y axis then basically anything more than what it takes to press a key on your keyboard will have an effect.

                                        Trying to stop the stone from rotating is a whole different matter because then you’re working against it’s stored inertia and that will be much much higher. No way to calculate that though unless you know it’s rate of spin.

                                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                                        healthetank@lemmy.ca
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #70

                                        I appreciate you finding that article - interesting one.

                                        I’m very much amateur curler, and can’t see how that tiny touch would impact it, but maybe it does at that level of competition.

                                        Using a perfect shot to stop on the button with no spin, and energy= all kinetic (1/2mv2) =friction energy(F*deltaX), we get a release speed of 1.8m/s (with a .006 coefficient), and a 2.98m/s speed (with a 0.016 coefficient).

                                        Using the same equation, I go ahead and rerun the number, but adding a distance of 0.1m, a value I used as a good approximation of a reliable accuracy of an Olympic throw, and a time of 0.2s (the approximate time I estimated based on the video), which means a deltaX2 of 0.36m, or 0.596m.

                                        1/2mv2+fapplieddeltaX2 = ffrictiondeltaX Fapplied comes out to 0.326N to 0.526N which is a miniscule amount.

                                        That seems to indicate that a tiny touch DOES have the potential to make a significant difference. Some sources say 0.25 to 0.5N is required for a keyboard press, so its roughly on par with that

                                        But, how much of a difference does the sweeping make on stone speed? Its easy to say that tiny change can impact things, but how does it compare to, say, sweeping hard vs not sweeping?

                                        This study shows a sweeping change of 45+/-8mm. Thus a change of 25% on top of that is not insignificant.

                                        So the last question is, does it make sense for someone to train specifically by cheating this way rather than doing it right and just pushing off with a more accurate force? That’s likely going to be subjective, but seems difficult to me.

                                        Who knows, maybe this is a crutch and it is making a difference. Sounds like they need to stop doing it any case, whether a way they’ve trained or not. Or wear a camera showing they don’t touch the rock and just hover their finger behind it.

                                        BuelldozerB 1 Reply Last reply
                                        6
                                        • G glide@lemmy.ca

                                          I mean, fuck Hexbear, but this is in fact all over the news. I’m sure it’s posted there in an anti-west bias, but that doesn’t make it untrue, and I absolutely demand better from my country than to cheat at the Olympics.

                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          F This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fleetwoodlinux@lemmy.zip
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #71

                                          I mean the text in the op you see here is identical to the hexbear op. I opened it up and the vast majority are just talking about it as the news it is with some jokes scattered in. The account you’re replying to is one of a handful that have identical posting patterns, one of which being they near(?) exclusively post anti-china and anti-russia shit, deserved or otherwise.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post